| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
1988 Hatch 302 swap
workin on gettin 10's :)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: chi
Posts: 13
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Volvo head DOHC
hey stangers does anyone have the specs on how to fab up the dohc volvo head on to a 2.3 block? or if there is a later post on it could u redirect me? is it even worth it? to much work?
THanks alot |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
Supercharged 89'/ 85' SVO
11.945 @ 119.6
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Napa Valley CA
Posts: 879
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
The B234F Volvo head is decent for a stock 16V head. The one I tested a few years ago, flowed close to 210 CFM @ 28” with the intake valves pushed close to the point of coil bind @ .445” valve lift. I’m not sure if I’d run the stock length valves for this reason. Port velocities were in the 300ish range at this lift. In contrast, my Esslinger street head managed flow numbers of 198 CFM at the same lift and velocity @ 325 fps. So much for the velocity being higher on a 16V head, but not everything needs to make sense; it just has to work, right?
Things take a more drastic turn when you open the valves a little further on both heads. Above .450” of valve lift, the Essy head starts to come to life. At .550” lift my head flows 232 CFM and seems to hold the port velocity above 300, while the Volvo takes a dive. This makes sense to me, since the Volvo head was optimized for the lower lift and pushing the valve open more, has less and less of an effect on flow after it crests .450” lift. You could port it and put some larger valves and seats in it, but if you are going to go to all that trouble, you should start searching the used racing car adds for something purpose built for racing, since hybrid engines are probably outside most if not all racing classes. I absolutely love my Esslinger head. It won’t do much for a bone stock engine, but the name of this site is called Modded Mustangs, which kind of suggests that the forums are geared towards modifying engines. if one were to spend the $1400-1800 required to get the Essligner or do the complete Volvo head swap (realistically about the same cost) I would assume that said person would probably modify quite a few other parts as well. I could have done the Volvo head swap on my car with ease. I have my own machining and welding equipment and plenty of parts sources. I went with the Esslinger head because ultimately, it is a purpose built racing part, with a significant amount testing and racing data behind it and scores of championship wins in various racing circles. Guess what? It bolted right atop of the engine without modifying a single thing and I can buy dozens of ready made camshaft grinds which are available for it right now! Today! Ultimately it will out flow the Volvo head, so I’m left with the question of why one might want to punish themselves by performing this swap? Other than that, I think it is a good idea. Here's the link to the info you asked for: http://www.merkurtech.com/merkurtech...es/item045.php Esslinger head:So nice!!
__________________
![]() Supercharged 2.7L 398 HP 501 ft lb !! Last edited by OHC230; April 1st, 2011 at 02:11 AM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1990 LX 2.3 Mustang
under construction
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gordon Ga.
Posts: 80
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I’m left with the question of why one might want to punish themselves by performing this swap?
other than the cool factor ,it seems like alot of work for nothing, but they do look cool! and the yellow stang, looks like a thunderbird to me ( I know its a fox body with a sn-95 roof but it looks like a thunderbird? anybody else??) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
1993 mustang 4cl
n/a
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 29
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
lolyou are right it does kiinda look like a t-bird
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
93 Mustang LX 2.3 T-5
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Vegreville, AB
Posts: 270
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Stick with the essy. The volvo swap is far too much work, for what OHC describes as not much of a benefit... Buy a cam, lopy idle. Good investment all day.
__________________
93 2.3l LX U.S. 15x7 ten hole rims Calypso green Moates QH T-5 Conversion Dual 2.5" Exhaust with Thrush Welded muffler
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Volvo head DOHC
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which Head Gasket Is Best For DOHC | BigEag205 | 4V / SVT | 3 | December 21st, 2010 01:42 PM |
| head gasket on a 95' volvo 850 non-turbo | FoxHoss | All Other Vehicles | 0 | December 1st, 2008 07:30 AM |
| Twin turbo volvo head swap 2.3 SVO video | TurboLX | 2.3 Mustangs | 84 | September 27th, 2007 06:36 PM |
| TT SVO Volvo head swap | MSO | The Clubhouse | 36 | June 15th, 2007 05:16 PM |
| Post some pics of a volvo head swap | MSO | 2.3 Mustangs | 22 | June 5th, 2007 03:36 PM |