Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 2.3 Mustangs

Discussing 2.3 N/A Performance Thread in the 2.3 Mustangs Forum. So it's still not complete yet, but I've re-wrote the entire thing. ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old September 8th, 2007, 05:18 AM   #1
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

2.3 N/A Performance Thread


So it's still not complete yet, but I've re-wrote the entire thing. Feel free to comment and advice/more info is always welcome!

Cheap/easy upgrades

Air intake: This is easy. You can use anything for this, your average everyday Civic intake from Autozone if you want.

Ranger Header: This is also pretty easy, you get a header from a 94-95 Ranger and it’s a direct bolt-on.

Ranger roller cam: This cam comes in 89+ Rangers and 91+ Mustangs, so if you have a 91+ Mustang, don’t bother with this one. It gives a slight boost in horsepower by reducing friction in the camshaft. Roller cams also don’t wear out as fast as flat-tappets.

Injectors and MAF: This is something I don't understand too well, so I'll just link to a site that gives some rather good information http://www.cadvision.com/blanchas/Ranger/efi.html

Knock sensor: This is extremely easy. You just unplug it! Set your timing correctly and take it off. This sensor is designed to lengthen the life of the 2.3 by setting the timing back at the slightest ping in the engine.

Muffler: A nice little upgrade to make your 2.3 sound different from the others. It's good for a few horsepower, maybe 3-5. A recommendation? Flowmaster 40 muffler will "make it sound like a big ol' V8." (thanks Turbo )



Medium difficulty/cost upgrades

Milling the head/Thinner head gasket: Fairly easy operation for a machine shop, material is removed from the head surface which increases compression. The thinner head gasket does the same thing, but doesn’t require work. Usually you do both when you get the head shaved. The increase in compression creates more horsepower.

Stage 1 cam: When I say stage 1, I’m referring to the level of performance it gives you. A relatively slight increase in horsepower without sacrificing too much gas mileage and without requiring you to change the valve train at all. These cams are relatively cheap from just a few horsepower increase around $110, to maybe a 10-20hp increase from $150-$200.

Cam timing gear: This is just a gear to adjust the timing of your camshaft. It doesn’t increase horsepower, but it allows you to adjust where your peak hp/tq is. This is especially useful with an aftermarket cam, as you wouldn’t notice much of a difference with the stock cam. These usually go around $80-$100.

7.5 rear: Yes, you have a 7.5 rear stock on your car. So why post it as an upgrade? Well, the pre-’86 Gts and SVOs had 7.5 rears with T-loks. The T-lok is really what you’re aiming for, a rear from a junked Mustang would be cheaper than a T-lok. So why not just get an 8.8? Honestly you can, but the increase in weight wouldn’t be worth it, as you will NEVER break the 7.5 with a n/a 2.3.

Exhaust: A lot of people make the mistake of getting an exhaust that is too big. A single 2.25” to 2.5” exhaust is fine. If you want duals, you’ll need smaller pipes. High-flow cats are advisable if you need to pass emissions, otherwise a straight back exhaust would be cheaper and create more power.

Aftermarket header: After you start upgrading to stage 2 cams and stroker kits, you’re going to need a bigger exhaust system to push all the gas out, a long tube header from an aftermarket company would do you good at that point. These only cost around $180 so it’s not out of your price range, but if you only have or plan to have slight mods, stick with the ranger header. Aftermarket headers are aimed more towards higher RPM applications.

Ignition: An aftermarket ignition system would give you a nice little boost in performance. A few horsepower, a little increase in gas mileage, and the ability to safely regulate your rev limit (in some systems). This is also a fairly cheap upgrade, going for around $200-$300.

Aluminum driveshaft: This is a relatively good upgrade. It reduces weight in the drive train, helping to get that power to the ground faster. It will help your engine rev faster and make the car feel peppier. Should go for around $200-$250.




Expensive/difficult upgrades

Stage 2+ cam: Stage 2 and 3 cams aren’t more expensive in themselves, it’s the cost in fuel economy, engine aggressiveness, and most of all, the cost of upgrading your valve train. These cams (esp the stage 3) will give you a nice increase in power, however it is necessary to replace your valve springs, valves, retainers, followers, etc. In some cams, oversized valves are necessary for proper geometry. An increase in compression is recommended for some, as is a proper exhaust/intake set-up and air/fuel ratio.

Swap to T5: You’re not going to gain any horsepower from this, but you would free some up and definitely notice a substantial increase in performance switching to a manual transmission from an automatic. However, this is a very difficult swap and usually costs a pretty penny.

Long rod/stoker kit: This is a relatively expensive mod, especially the stroker. The long rod kit can be obtained for around $550. It works by using longer rods to push a smaller piston, increasing the time the piston spends at the top of the combustion chamber, allowing the fuel to burn more and creating more horsepower. A long rod kit does not change stroke or compression. A stroker kit, on the other hand, uses a different crankshaft (thus being more expensive) to change the stroke. It too uses a longer rod and smaller piston, and does about the same thing. However, along with keeping the piston at the top longer, it increases the stroke, effectively burning the fuel even further. A stroker kit would change the displacement of the engine, for example, it would go from a 2.3L to a 2.5L with certain kits.

Port and polish: We all know what porting and polishing does right? This upgrade will open up the passageways that allow air into the engine. From what I understand, one of the main problems the 2.3 has with making power is the restrictive airflow. Solve this problem and you’re on your way to making big power.

Tuner/Computer: I don’t really understand these too well, I need input from more experienced people.

Gears/T-lok: Gears are a very easy way to get an increase in acceleration, at the cost of gas mileage. On an n/a 2.3, 4.10s or even 4.30s wouldn’t be a bad idea. (insert calculator here) See for yourself. Also, if you didn’t/couldn’t get the 7.5 rear from an early GT, you can always buy one. I would get both at once, since it would cut the install price to do both at once instead of coming back twice. Putting power to both wheels is important as you start to make more and more power.
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old September 8th, 2007, 05:20 AM   #2
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

feel free to add info and/or comment on it

dont be afraid to say "hey MSO, you dont know wtf ur talkin about"

this is jus a rough draft.. ill fix it later..
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old September 13th, 2007, 04:05 PM   #3
Regular
 
93fourbangerstanger's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 377
Default

and blocking (egr valve) give you about 10 free hp and better gas milege

and when i say better gas milege i mean it, you can most def tell a diff.
__________________
93 fourbanger /intake,exhaust,erg delete,8 inch sub...for now


fukin gas prices!
 
Old September 13th, 2007, 04:08 PM   #4
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

oh wow

i cant believe i missed that

hahahahahahha

<----- newb

ill have turbo fix that
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old September 13th, 2007, 04:17 PM   #5
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnieg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 473
Default

wow.. ive noticed a bad change in my gas milage
with the EGR blocked off.

also you forgot my exhaust hack
__________________
1990 2.3L Mustang Hatchback.
Ford 2.3
Custom Mustangs
 
Old September 13th, 2007, 05:05 PM   #6
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

hmm maybe you didnt do it right

did you do the computer thing so it thinks the EGR is still working?
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old September 13th, 2007, 05:07 PM   #7
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnieg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 473
Default

you dont have to do anythign just shove a plate
between the EGR and the Intake. I went to the
point where I had two gaskets on both sides so
Im not getting any exhaust leaks from the EGR
where it meets the intake, and on the other side
of the plate so I dont have a intake that will have
leaks as well. no Check Engine light or nothing
__________________
1990 2.3L Mustang Hatchback.
Ford 2.3
Custom Mustangs
 
Old September 14th, 2007, 01:03 AM   #8
Banned
 
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,783
Default

I accidently deleted your performance upgrade post CM
 
Old September 14th, 2007, 10:29 AM   #9
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnieg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 473
Default

Originally Posted by TurboLX
I accidently deleted your performance upgrade post CM
lol
__________________
1990 2.3L Mustang Hatchback.
Ford 2.3
Custom Mustangs
 
Old October 1st, 2007, 12:51 PM   #10
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

So it's still not complete yet, but I've re-wrote the entire thing. Feel free to comment and advice/more info is always welcome!

Cheap/easy upgrades

Air intake: This is easy. You can use anything for this, your average everyday Civic intake from Autozone if you want.

Ranger Header: This is also pretty easy, you get a header from a 94-95 Ranger and it’s a direct bolt-on.

Ranger roller cam: This cam comes in 89+ Rangers and 91+ Mustangs, so if you have a 91+ Mustang, don’t bother with this one. It gives a slight boost in horsepower by reducing friction in the camshaft. Roller cams also don’t wear out as fast as flat-tappets.

Injectors and MAF: This is something I don't understand too well, so I'll just link to a site that gives some rather good information http://www.cadvision.com/blanchas/Ranger/efi.html

Knock sensor: This is extremely easy. You just unplug it! Set your timing correctly and take it off. This sensor is designed to lengthen the life of the 2.3 by setting the timing back at the slightest ping in the engine.

Muffler: A nice little upgrade to make your 2.3 sound different from the others. It's good for a few horsepower, maybe 3-5. A recommendation? Flowmaster 40 muffler will "make it sound like a big ol' V8." (thanks Turbo )



Medium difficulty/cost upgrades

Milling the head/Thinner head gasket: Fairly easy operation for a machine shop, material is removed from the head surface which increases compression. The thinner head gasket does the same thing, but doesn’t require work. Usually you do both when you get the head shaved. The increase in compression creates more horsepower.

Stage 1 cam: When I say stage 1, I’m referring to the level of performance it gives you. A relatively slight increase in horsepower without sacrificing too much gas mileage and without requiring you to change the valve train at all. These cams are relatively cheap from just a few horsepower increase around $110, to maybe a 10-20hp increase from $150-$200.

Cam timing gear: This is just a gear to adjust the timing of your camshaft. It doesn’t increase horsepower, but it allows you to adjust where your peak hp/tq is. This is especially useful with an aftermarket cam, as you wouldn’t notice much of a difference with the stock cam. These usually go around $80-$100.

7.5 rear: Yes, you have a 7.5 rear stock on your car. So why post it as an upgrade? Well, the pre-’86 Gts and SVOs had 7.5 rears with T-loks. The T-lok is really what you’re aiming for, a rear from a junked Mustang would be cheaper than a T-lok. So why not just get an 8.8? Honestly you can, but the increase in weight wouldn’t be worth it, as you will NEVER break the 7.5 with a n/a 2.3.

Exhaust: A lot of people make the mistake of getting an exhaust that is too big. A single 2.25” to 2.5” exhaust is fine. If you want duals, you’ll need smaller pipes. High-flow cats are advisable if you need to pass emissions, otherwise a straight back exhaust would be cheaper and create more power.

Aftermarket header: After you start upgrading to stage 2 cams and stroker kits, you’re going to need a bigger exhaust system to push all the gas out, a long tube header from an aftermarket company would do you good at that point. These only cost around $180 so it’s not out of your price range, but if you only have or plan to have slight mods, stick with the ranger header. Aftermarket headers are aimed more towards higher RPM applications.

Ignition: An aftermarket ignition system would give you a nice little boost in performance. A few horsepower, a little increase in gas mileage, and the ability to safely regulate your rev limit (in some systems). This is also a fairly cheap upgrade, going for around $200-$300.

Aluminum driveshaft: This is a relatively good upgrade. It reduces weight in the drive train, helping to get that power to the ground faster. It will help your engine rev faster and make the car feel peppier. Should go for around $200-$250.




Expensive/difficult upgrades

Stage 2+ cam: Stage 2 and 3 cams aren’t more expensive in themselves, it’s the cost in fuel economy, engine aggressiveness, and most of all, the cost of upgrading your valve train. These cams (esp the stage 3) will give you a nice increase in power, however it is necessary to replace your valve springs, valves, retainers, followers, etc. In some cams, oversized valves are necessary for proper geometry. An increase in compression is recommended for some, as is a proper exhaust/intake set-up and air/fuel ratio.

Swap to T5: You’re not going to gain any horsepower from this, but you would free some up and definitely notice a substantial increase in performance switching to a manual transmission from an automatic. However, this is a very difficult swap and usually costs a pretty penny.

Long rod/stoker kit: This is a relatively expensive mod, especially the stroker. The long rod kit can be obtained for around $550. It works by using longer rods to push a smaller piston, increasing the time the piston spends at the top of the combustion chamber, allowing the fuel to burn more and creating more horsepower. A long rod kit does not change stroke or compression. A stroker kit, on the other hand, uses a different crankshaft (thus being more expensive) to change the stroke. It too uses a longer rod and smaller piston, and does about the same thing. However, along with keeping the piston at the top longer, it increases the stroke, effectively burning the fuel even further. A stroker kit would change the displacement of the engine, for example, it would go from a 2.3L to a 2.5L with certain kits.

Port and polish: We all know what porting and polishing does right? This upgrade will open up the passageways that allow air into the engine. From what I understand, one of the main problems the 2.3 has with making power is the restrictive airflow. Solve this problem and you’re on your way to making big power.

Tuner/Computer: I don’t really understand these too well, I need input from more experienced people.

Gears/T-lok: Gears are a very easy way to get an increase in acceleration, at the cost of gas mileage. On an n/a 2.3, 4.10s or even 4.30s wouldn’t be a bad idea. (insert calculator here) See for yourself. Also, if you didn’t/couldn’t get the 7.5 rear from an early GT, you can always buy one. I would get both at once, since it would cut the install price to do both at once instead of coming back twice. Putting power to both wheels is important as you start to make more and more power.






change it to that k?

i think that's a better version
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old October 29th, 2007, 04:15 PM   #11
Regular
 
93fourbangerstanger's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 377
Default

better
__________________
93 fourbanger /intake,exhaust,erg delete,8 inch sub...for now


fukin gas prices!
 
Old October 29th, 2007, 04:17 PM   #12
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

hm turbo you shuda quoted me when you changed it

the underlined and highlighted words make it look better
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old October 29th, 2007, 04:24 PM   #13
Banned
 
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,783
Default

here is where you can get an EGR block off plate

http://www.thedetailzone.com/Ford%20...j%20Access.htm

scroll to middle of page.


upper intake (aftermarket)

http://www.cp-e.com/2009.html
 
Old November 8th, 2007, 09:35 PM   #14
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

^are those upper intakes good for n/a engines?

and a 60mm TB is too big for one right?
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old November 9th, 2007, 08:08 AM   #15
Banned
 
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,783
Default

the intake might be to much, but the TB will be nice upgrade
 
Old December 28th, 2007, 01:05 PM   #16
Newbie
 
1981capri's Avatar
 
1981 Capri
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
Default

First let me say that I am really enjoying this site..
 
Old December 28th, 2007, 01:06 PM   #17
Newbie
 
1981capri's Avatar
 
1981 Capri
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
Default

I have a 81 capri with a 83 2.3 in it and I am looking to restore the car
 
Old December 28th, 2007, 01:11 PM   #18
Newbie
 
1981capri's Avatar
 
1981 Capri
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
Default

would you guys suggest staying with the carburated engine or should I go with a later model fuel injected engine
 
Old December 28th, 2007, 03:59 PM   #19
MSO
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
Default

2.3s suck with carb, i'd go with fuel injection

unless you plan on serious racing, in which case i don't think it would matter either way
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods
Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE]
 
Old December 30th, 2007, 07:51 PM   #20
Newbie
 
1981capri's Avatar
 
1981 Capri
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
Default

Hmmm well if I go with the fuel injection that means I have to find another engine...
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: 2.3 N/A Performance Thread
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Old Are You Thread... MustanG_guy17 The Clubhouse 65 November 15th, 2007 07:40 PM
serious thread 232stang The Clubhouse 52 August 25th, 2007 05:59 AM
The Job Thread MSO The Clubhouse 241 August 18th, 2007 04:30 PM
Another cam thread. Please help !! auburntiger7231 99-04 3 July 4th, 2007 01:11 AM
staight line performance or track performance??? andoutcomethewolves V6 Mustangs 12 February 19th, 2007 12:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.