![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing 2.3 N/A Performance Thread in the 2.3 Mustangs Forum. So it's still not complete yet, but I've re-wrote the entire thing. ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
2.3 N/A Performance Thread
So it's still not complete yet, but I've re-wrote the entire thing. Feel free to comment and advice/more info is always welcome!
Cheap/easy upgrades Air intake: This is easy. You can use anything for this, your average everyday Civic intake from Autozone if you want. Ranger Header: This is also pretty easy, you get a header from a 94-95 Ranger and it’s a direct bolt-on. Ranger roller cam: This cam comes in 89+ Rangers and 91+ Mustangs, so if you have a 91+ Mustang, don’t bother with this one. It gives a slight boost in horsepower by reducing friction in the camshaft. Roller cams also don’t wear out as fast as flat-tappets. Injectors and MAF: This is something I don't understand too well, so I'll just link to a site that gives some rather good information http://www.cadvision.com/blanchas/Ranger/efi.html Knock sensor: This is extremely easy. You just unplug it! Set your timing correctly and take it off. This sensor is designed to lengthen the life of the 2.3 by setting the timing back at the slightest ping in the engine. Muffler: A nice little upgrade to make your 2.3 sound different from the others. It's good for a few horsepower, maybe 3-5. A recommendation? Flowmaster 40 muffler will "make it sound like a big ol' V8." (thanks Turbo )Medium difficulty/cost upgrades Milling the head/Thinner head gasket: Fairly easy operation for a machine shop, material is removed from the head surface which increases compression. The thinner head gasket does the same thing, but doesn’t require work. Usually you do both when you get the head shaved. The increase in compression creates more horsepower. Stage 1 cam: When I say stage 1, I’m referring to the level of performance it gives you. A relatively slight increase in horsepower without sacrificing too much gas mileage and without requiring you to change the valve train at all. These cams are relatively cheap from just a few horsepower increase around $110, to maybe a 10-20hp increase from $150-$200. Cam timing gear: This is just a gear to adjust the timing of your camshaft. It doesn’t increase horsepower, but it allows you to adjust where your peak hp/tq is. This is especially useful with an aftermarket cam, as you wouldn’t notice much of a difference with the stock cam. These usually go around $80-$100. 7.5 rear: Yes, you have a 7.5 rear stock on your car. So why post it as an upgrade? Well, the pre-’86 Gts and SVOs had 7.5 rears with T-loks. The T-lok is really what you’re aiming for, a rear from a junked Mustang would be cheaper than a T-lok. So why not just get an 8.8? Honestly you can, but the increase in weight wouldn’t be worth it, as you will NEVER break the 7.5 with a n/a 2.3. Exhaust: A lot of people make the mistake of getting an exhaust that is too big. A single 2.25” to 2.5” exhaust is fine. If you want duals, you’ll need smaller pipes. High-flow cats are advisable if you need to pass emissions, otherwise a straight back exhaust would be cheaper and create more power. Aftermarket header: After you start upgrading to stage 2 cams and stroker kits, you’re going to need a bigger exhaust system to push all the gas out, a long tube header from an aftermarket company would do you good at that point. These only cost around $180 so it’s not out of your price range, but if you only have or plan to have slight mods, stick with the ranger header. Aftermarket headers are aimed more towards higher RPM applications. Ignition: An aftermarket ignition system would give you a nice little boost in performance. A few horsepower, a little increase in gas mileage, and the ability to safely regulate your rev limit (in some systems). This is also a fairly cheap upgrade, going for around $200-$300. Aluminum driveshaft: This is a relatively good upgrade. It reduces weight in the drive train, helping to get that power to the ground faster. It will help your engine rev faster and make the car feel peppier. Should go for around $200-$250. Expensive/difficult upgrades Stage 2+ cam: Stage 2 and 3 cams aren’t more expensive in themselves, it’s the cost in fuel economy, engine aggressiveness, and most of all, the cost of upgrading your valve train. These cams (esp the stage 3) will give you a nice increase in power, however it is necessary to replace your valve springs, valves, retainers, followers, etc. In some cams, oversized valves are necessary for proper geometry. An increase in compression is recommended for some, as is a proper exhaust/intake set-up and air/fuel ratio. Swap to T5: You’re not going to gain any horsepower from this, but you would free some up and definitely notice a substantial increase in performance switching to a manual transmission from an automatic. However, this is a very difficult swap and usually costs a pretty penny. Long rod/stoker kit: This is a relatively expensive mod, especially the stroker. The long rod kit can be obtained for around $550. It works by using longer rods to push a smaller piston, increasing the time the piston spends at the top of the combustion chamber, allowing the fuel to burn more and creating more horsepower. A long rod kit does not change stroke or compression. A stroker kit, on the other hand, uses a different crankshaft (thus being more expensive) to change the stroke. It too uses a longer rod and smaller piston, and does about the same thing. However, along with keeping the piston at the top longer, it increases the stroke, effectively burning the fuel even further. A stroker kit would change the displacement of the engine, for example, it would go from a 2.3L to a 2.5L with certain kits. Port and polish: We all know what porting and polishing does right? This upgrade will open up the passageways that allow air into the engine. From what I understand, one of the main problems the 2.3 has with making power is the restrictive airflow. Solve this problem and you’re on your way to making big power. Tuner/Computer: I don’t really understand these too well, I need input from more experienced people. Gears/T-lok: Gears are a very easy way to get an increase in acceleration, at the cost of gas mileage. On an n/a 2.3, 4.10s or even 4.30s wouldn’t be a bad idea. (insert calculator here) See for yourself. Also, if you didn’t/couldn’t get the 7.5 rear from an early GT, you can always buy one. I would get both at once, since it would cut the install price to do both at once instead of coming back twice. Putting power to both wheels is important as you start to make more and more power.
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
feel free to add info and/or comment on it
dont be afraid to say "hey MSO, you dont know wtf ur talkin about" this is jus a rough draft.. ill fix it later..
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 377
|
and blocking (egr valve) give you about 10 free hp and better gas milege
and when i say better gas milege i mean it, you can most def tell a diff.
__________________
93 fourbanger /intake,exhaust,erg delete,8 inch sub...for now![]() fukin gas prices! |
|
|
#4 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
oh wow
i cant believe i missed that hahahahahahha <----- newb ill have turbo fix that
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnieg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 473
|
wow.. ive noticed a bad change in my gas milage
with the EGR blocked off. also you forgot my exhaust hack
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
hmm maybe you didnt do it right
![]() did you do the computer thing so it thinks the EGR is still working?
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnieg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 473
|
you dont have to do anythign just shove a plate
between the EGR and the Intake. I went to the point where I had two gaskets on both sides so Im not getting any exhaust leaks from the EGR where it meets the intake, and on the other side of the plate so I dont have a intake that will have leaks as well. no Check Engine light or nothing |
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,783
|
I accidently deleted your performance upgrade post CM
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnieg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 473
|
lol
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
So it's still not complete yet, but I've re-wrote the entire thing. Feel free to comment and advice/more info is always welcome!
Cheap/easy upgrades Air intake: This is easy. You can use anything for this, your average everyday Civic intake from Autozone if you want. Ranger Header: This is also pretty easy, you get a header from a 94-95 Ranger and it’s a direct bolt-on. Ranger roller cam: This cam comes in 89+ Rangers and 91+ Mustangs, so if you have a 91+ Mustang, don’t bother with this one. It gives a slight boost in horsepower by reducing friction in the camshaft. Roller cams also don’t wear out as fast as flat-tappets. Injectors and MAF: This is something I don't understand too well, so I'll just link to a site that gives some rather good information http://www.cadvision.com/blanchas/Ranger/efi.html Knock sensor: This is extremely easy. You just unplug it! Set your timing correctly and take it off. This sensor is designed to lengthen the life of the 2.3 by setting the timing back at the slightest ping in the engine. Muffler: A nice little upgrade to make your 2.3 sound different from the others. It's good for a few horsepower, maybe 3-5. A recommendation? Flowmaster 40 muffler will "make it sound like a big ol' V8." (thanks Turbo )Medium difficulty/cost upgrades Milling the head/Thinner head gasket: Fairly easy operation for a machine shop, material is removed from the head surface which increases compression. The thinner head gasket does the same thing, but doesn’t require work. Usually you do both when you get the head shaved. The increase in compression creates more horsepower. Stage 1 cam: When I say stage 1, I’m referring to the level of performance it gives you. A relatively slight increase in horsepower without sacrificing too much gas mileage and without requiring you to change the valve train at all. These cams are relatively cheap from just a few horsepower increase around $110, to maybe a 10-20hp increase from $150-$200. Cam timing gear: This is just a gear to adjust the timing of your camshaft. It doesn’t increase horsepower, but it allows you to adjust where your peak hp/tq is. This is especially useful with an aftermarket cam, as you wouldn’t notice much of a difference with the stock cam. These usually go around $80-$100. 7.5 rear: Yes, you have a 7.5 rear stock on your car. So why post it as an upgrade? Well, the pre-’86 Gts and SVOs had 7.5 rears with T-loks. The T-lok is really what you’re aiming for, a rear from a junked Mustang would be cheaper than a T-lok. So why not just get an 8.8? Honestly you can, but the increase in weight wouldn’t be worth it, as you will NEVER break the 7.5 with a n/a 2.3. Exhaust: A lot of people make the mistake of getting an exhaust that is too big. A single 2.25” to 2.5” exhaust is fine. If you want duals, you’ll need smaller pipes. High-flow cats are advisable if you need to pass emissions, otherwise a straight back exhaust would be cheaper and create more power. Aftermarket header: After you start upgrading to stage 2 cams and stroker kits, you’re going to need a bigger exhaust system to push all the gas out, a long tube header from an aftermarket company would do you good at that point. These only cost around $180 so it’s not out of your price range, but if you only have or plan to have slight mods, stick with the ranger header. Aftermarket headers are aimed more towards higher RPM applications. Ignition: An aftermarket ignition system would give you a nice little boost in performance. A few horsepower, a little increase in gas mileage, and the ability to safely regulate your rev limit (in some systems). This is also a fairly cheap upgrade, going for around $200-$300. Aluminum driveshaft: This is a relatively good upgrade. It reduces weight in the drive train, helping to get that power to the ground faster. It will help your engine rev faster and make the car feel peppier. Should go for around $200-$250. Expensive/difficult upgrades Stage 2+ cam: Stage 2 and 3 cams aren’t more expensive in themselves, it’s the cost in fuel economy, engine aggressiveness, and most of all, the cost of upgrading your valve train. These cams (esp the stage 3) will give you a nice increase in power, however it is necessary to replace your valve springs, valves, retainers, followers, etc. In some cams, oversized valves are necessary for proper geometry. An increase in compression is recommended for some, as is a proper exhaust/intake set-up and air/fuel ratio. Swap to T5: You’re not going to gain any horsepower from this, but you would free some up and definitely notice a substantial increase in performance switching to a manual transmission from an automatic. However, this is a very difficult swap and usually costs a pretty penny. Long rod/stoker kit: This is a relatively expensive mod, especially the stroker. The long rod kit can be obtained for around $550. It works by using longer rods to push a smaller piston, increasing the time the piston spends at the top of the combustion chamber, allowing the fuel to burn more and creating more horsepower. A long rod kit does not change stroke or compression. A stroker kit, on the other hand, uses a different crankshaft (thus being more expensive) to change the stroke. It too uses a longer rod and smaller piston, and does about the same thing. However, along with keeping the piston at the top longer, it increases the stroke, effectively burning the fuel even further. A stroker kit would change the displacement of the engine, for example, it would go from a 2.3L to a 2.5L with certain kits. Port and polish: We all know what porting and polishing does right? This upgrade will open up the passageways that allow air into the engine. From what I understand, one of the main problems the 2.3 has with making power is the restrictive airflow. Solve this problem and you’re on your way to making big power. Tuner/Computer: I don’t really understand these too well, I need input from more experienced people. Gears/T-lok: Gears are a very easy way to get an increase in acceleration, at the cost of gas mileage. On an n/a 2.3, 4.10s or even 4.30s wouldn’t be a bad idea. (insert calculator here) See for yourself. Also, if you didn’t/couldn’t get the 7.5 rear from an early GT, you can always buy one. I would get both at once, since it would cut the install price to do both at once instead of coming back twice. Putting power to both wheels is important as you start to make more and more power. change it to that k? i think that's a better version
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 377
|
better
__________________
93 fourbanger /intake,exhaust,erg delete,8 inch sub...for now![]() fukin gas prices! |
|
|
#12 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
hm turbo you shuda quoted me when you changed it
the underlined and highlighted words make it look better
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,783
|
here is where you can get an EGR block off plate
http://www.thedetailzone.com/Ford%20...j%20Access.htm scroll to middle of page. upper intake (aftermarket) http://www.cp-e.com/2009.html |
|
|
#14 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
^are those upper intakes good for n/a engines?
and a 60mm TB is too big for one right?
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,783
|
the intake might be to much, but the TB will be nice upgrade
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Newbie
1981 Capri
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
|
First let me say that I am really enjoying this site..
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Newbie
1981 Capri
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
|
I have a 81 capri with a 83 2.3 in it and I am looking to restore the car
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Newbie
1981 Capri
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
|
would you guys suggest staying with the carburated engine or should I go with a later model fuel injected engine
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,924
|
2.3s suck with carb, i'd go with fuel injection
unless you plan on serious racing, in which case i don't think it would matter either way
__________________
[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="4"]Members Against Mods Crew member #7[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]Dean MSO[/COLOR][/SIZE] |
|
|
#20 |
|
Newbie
1981 Capri
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 36
|
Hmmm well if I go with the fuel injection that means I have to find another engine...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 2.3 N/A Performance Thread
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Old Are You Thread... | MustanG_guy17 | The Clubhouse | 65 | November 15th, 2007 07:40 PM |
| serious thread | 232stang | The Clubhouse | 52 | August 25th, 2007 05:59 AM |
| The Job Thread | MSO | The Clubhouse | 241 | August 18th, 2007 04:30 PM |
| Another cam thread. Please help !! | auburntiger7231 | 99-04 | 3 | July 4th, 2007 01:11 AM |
| staight line performance or track performance??? | andoutcomethewolves | V6 Mustangs | 12 | February 19th, 2007 12:34 PM |