| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Regular
2003 mustang gt
12.18 @113.22 mph
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bristol va.
Posts: 374
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
not my section but i run a centri and from launch to finish it will never see below 4 psi and it only runs 7 in the cool, 6 in hot. 402 rwhp 441 rwtq 12.8 @ 109 mph at bristol- thunder valley horrid elevation. my cousin has a turbo v6 and i know a few people with turbo 2v's i wouldnt dare run one enless i wanted to make stupid power because the DO lack down low enless you got alot of $ + boost.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned
2009 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 6,520
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
this is just where it gets into personal preference. i get woodies over KB'd 4vs. the whine is so ungodly i just kind of freeze up when i hear one. if there was a KB'd cobra running me down, i would totally give him the deer-in-the-headlights look and just let him kill me. as for turbos and wastegates, i just can't stand the thought of my car sneezing between gears.
and belt slip is an easy fix. i'd be more concerned about boost lag.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Banned
2009 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 6,520
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
I don't know watch the second run on this video... 21 seconds the turbo just tells the KB car "good bye" and you can hear it ![]() hear that kb crying in the background?! You know only time you hear those things is when your in front of them
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers Last edited by ESG-642T; June 9th, 2009 at 05:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 V6 Mustang
Too long@Too slow
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 2,649
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
That Fox has to way a couple hundred pounds less though.
(I'm not picking sides, so no one start arguing with me)
__________________
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Banned
2009 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 6,520
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
but fuck that). each setup has their distinct advantages and disadvantages. i wish s/c setups had peak numbers like turbo setups, and i wish turbos had a fatter power curve like s/c's, but you can't have everything (unless you compound boost the mother fucker). each setup lacks something that the other has.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
About the weight is true the cobra is way heavier than the fox aprox 400-600 pounds don't remember so don't quote me on this. KB has more low end torque but as soon the turbo reaches his peak it beats the KB... (depending on the size of the turbo and boost)
__________________
2003 Mach 1 Procharged 500rwhp club
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
muneris pro ego
|
take a turbo at 11 psi and a s/c at 11 psi... you will see better numbers with the turbo.
__________________
Buy my M90 Kit and my Gears and T-Loc! MM ZDC - Alaska Base Commander MM+ Cleavage Club #24 MM Cares Crew / Military Crew M2C2 President / USCG - OS2 ![]() |
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
You really must not look at turbo power curves often, go to SVTP and look at some of those 19psi kb guys who swapped over to a single turbo kit and are running 15psi the graph is so much fatter after 3k rpm
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Regular
|
yeah kenne belle superchargers sound absolutely amazing... i love that sound. bov's sound pretty bad ass 2.. i love pullin up beside somebody n hammerin that bov off beside someone haha.. it gets ppls attention:-D
__________________
06 v6 stang, 5-speed, pony package |
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Regular
2006 Mustang v6
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 487
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Just do a search. A turbo will get you the most hp and the quickest 1/4 ET's.
__________________
Former :06 4.0L 6spd Mustang...TR6060 Now: 06 Mustang 4.6L 3V with some mods ![]() MAD Crew 23
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Banned
2009 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 6,520
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
![]() did anybody even read what i wrote? because i clearly never denied the fact that turbos typically have higher peaks.
__________________
![]() Last edited by 101fng; June 14th, 2009 at 09:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Regular
|
IMHO, I think a turbocharger has more potential and will in the long run add more HP.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Turbo Charger or Super Charger?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Super Charger, Turbo Charger Effects? | Gtwrestler | Modular Mustangs | 15 | June 9th, 2009 07:02 PM |
| Super charger or turbo? | Steam | 2005 - 2010 V6 | 26 | April 13th, 2009 10:12 PM |
| Super charger VS turbo charger | stinglikeastang | V6 Mustangs | 25 | July 23rd, 2007 10:24 PM |
| Super Charger or Turbo | Bayouboy4.6 | 2005 - 2010 | 6 | June 28th, 2007 02:41 AM |