| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (5) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
MAC Prochamber
What is a prochamber? is it like an x pipe or h pipe design?
Anybody know how its suppose to work? |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
2006 GT
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 125
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
They call them prochamber- H pipes. Its just a box welded in where the gases mix/equalize. I guess its supposed to be the best flowing/designed midpipe. It also tones the sound down just a bit and cleans it up. I love the sound of my pc + the Mac mufflers. Sounds sooooooo good. Here is a pic of what the inside of the box looks like.
![]()
__________________
2006 GT Blk/Blk 5 Spd. JLT Intake + Brenspeed Tune Hurst STS Mac a/b Mac o/r Prochamber Tint |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
2006 GT
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 125
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Get the pc.....trust me, great quality/sound. Its more then the pypes H but IMO you get what you pay for.
__________________
2006 GT Blk/Blk 5 Spd. JLT Intake + Brenspeed Tune Hurst STS Mac a/b Mac o/r Prochamber Tint |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 68
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
So the pic shows the exit and it looks like its not really connected to the inlet right?
the inlets look like they are coming in straight and the outlet pipes are pointed at the opposite inlet pipe or am i seeing things. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,951
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Its suppose to create something like a scavenging affect. the gasses fill up in the box and heat builds which makes it travel faster. Doesnt make sense. slow it down to speed it up but maybe someone smarter can understand and explain it better.
x pipe is going to flow freer. but the a benifit would be, x pipe performance, h pipe sound. |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,951
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
No its not connected just two holes on each side. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
Blank
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,733
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I think the prochamber is in between the x and h, it's for sound and performance right?
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
George Klass from Accufab who does designs custom headers has done multiple testing.....his recommendation? H-pipes.
of which he was referring to this picture that was posted in a thread on hardcore50.... ![]() Yea this thread is old, but hey, spreading good info is never a bad thing
|
||
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,951
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
LOL. Rock on. So i was spreading bad information about x pipes being better huh?
Im honered that your second post was clearing this up. Now I know, so how much could I gain with something other then my x pipe? I might hit 400 again boys. And I cant see anything in your picture, it looks like a type of x to me. And if DEI is running H pipes maybe thats why that boy hasnt won a race in years. Last edited by 07stanggt; October 8th, 2009 at 10:47 PM. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,951
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I agree with you on BBK and Bassani's x pipes. Which is why i run coughkookscough.
Let me get this straight, your qoute says that a H pipe and prochamber works about the same and a x pipe is less? That is a qoute from accufab that makes headers for DEI? Total BS from anything I have ever read, seen, heard, or first hand tested myself with my car with a H and X pipe. Thats just my personal opinon though. Welcome to the forum and at least you posted up some cool shit to argue about. Last edited by 07stanggt; October 8th, 2009 at 10:52 PM. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,461
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I've always had the understanding that X-pipes yield maybe 3-4 more top end hp than H-pipes, but the torque is higher on an H set up. Also, overall low end power is greater with an H which includes hp and tq. Here's a handful of links for you guys to look over. I don't see where there can be that much of a difference to talk about in the overall picture other than which sound you may prefer or which set up yields more power in your particular application which I would think varies from set up to set up.
P32980 Image Large Photo Dyno Results: X pipe over Y pipe C5 X Pipe Install - Tech Articles - Vette Magazine From what I see, an X-pipe set up will in theory make more power as long as the rest of the exhaust system is matched just right to the engine's particular modifications. In real world situations it comes down to sound preference. On the Nascar track or competing for hundredths of seconds on the drag strip I can see where a the minimal gains could help you edge out the other guy.
__________________
JDM 302 Stroker, Whipple 10 rib 12 psi, L&M, JBA, J&M, LFP, Corsa, BBR Stage II cams, Manley, MGW, McLeod RST, Metco, Steeda, Autometer, CDC, Street Scene, SOS, Tuned at JPC Racing by Kevin MacDonald Last edited by Anthony05GT; October 9th, 2009 at 10:03 AM. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,951
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
And when you are racing are you in the 6000 rpm range or the 2000 rpm range? (rhetorical)
I refer back to a another thread. If you want to know what works ask the people winning races or running times you think are good times. Ask JPC, JDM, Vinny Barber, Ford racing what crossover is on their car. I bet 10 bucks payable via paypal its a x pipe and I doubt they all did it becuase they prefer the sound. So my comment stands. X pipe is better. No one said its a 20hp gain. But to say its 3 hp accross the board is incorrect as well. Exhuast gains will increase based on the HP of an engine. A 500hp engine will probably gain more from a exhuast or intake modification then a 300hp engine. / thread |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
More Is Better.
|
Those tubes on the prochamber actually extend into the box a bit - and they are staggered as that other picture shows. There is definitely some thought that went into the design - it is not just a "box".
They also make one to run the factory cats. I run one with Borla Stingers (Roush Off road exhaust): ![]() ![]()
__________________
Roush Short shifter / Carmen's 3.47" TVS pulley Roush TVS Supercharger Steeda suspension /Big Brakes Mac L/T's / Prochamber / Roush Extremes KB BAP "Daily Driver" RWHP: 492@9 PSI w/ LT's "Dyno Queen": 512@12 PSI-stock exhaust Mods in Garage |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
More Is Better.
|
__________________
Roush Short shifter / Carmen's 3.47" TVS pulley Roush TVS Supercharger Steeda suspension /Big Brakes Mac L/T's / Prochamber / Roush Extremes KB BAP "Daily Driver" RWHP: 492@9 PSI w/ LT's "Dyno Queen": 512@12 PSI-stock exhaust Mods in Garage |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Blown 03 GT
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 6,238
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,461
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
One thing's for sure, all of the fastest cars on the tracks do have X-pipes from what I've seen in recent years, because when matched up properly they do the job a little better, so there's no need to place any bets. For the average street guy who's not worried about a few hp, but prefer a deeper old school tone I'd hate to see them buy an X-pipe then cry about the raspy sound. Also, most driving is done on the street and not at 6000 rpm's. I would say that most guys reading this spend most of their driving time in traffic. The X-pipes have a distinct tonal difference that's unmistakable. Some guys like it and some don't. I have heard X-pipes that I do like the sound, but more often I personally do not.
__________________
JDM 302 Stroker, Whipple 10 rib 12 psi, L&M, JBA, J&M, LFP, Corsa, BBR Stage II cams, Manley, MGW, McLeod RST, Metco, Steeda, Autometer, CDC, Street Scene, SOS, Tuned at JPC Racing by Kevin MacDonald |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,872
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
the prochamber has an amazing sound, very deep, but an X-pipe is more efficient overall.
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned
2009 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 5,696
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
why are people gettin so butt hurt about mid-pipes? aren't there more important things in life? like poontang?
__________________
my rules: 1) at least pretend like you know thrasher and I are together 2) try to arrange a personal meeting with thrasher, and it will only be a matter of time before you meet 101fng |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Skirt Chasing Philanderer
Kit Car/Ducati/Explorer
Nike Fast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,977
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
A prochamber isnt an X or an H, its classified on it own... I have had prochambers on all my mustangs as I love the tone, but the X will out perform it ( not by a ton though ).
__________________
Might want to consider writing down what is said above, it will help you at some point or another in your life!
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moderator
2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,374
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I never raced my GT when I owned it...however I had an O/R prochamber on it paired with borla stingers that got compliments EVERYWHERE and thats all that mattered to me lol
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/2005-2010/128047-mac-prochamber.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| need help with x pipe - SVTPerformance | This thread | Pingback | August 9th, 2011 02:05 AM | |
| 07+ Owners with MAC Prochamber, need help. - CMC Forums | This thread | Refback | April 26th, 2010 10:44 AM | |
| 07+ Owners with MAC Prochamber, need help. - CMC Forums | This thread | Refback | April 15th, 2010 11:30 AM | |
| 07+ Owners with MAC Prochamber, need help. - CMC Forums | This thread | Refback | April 14th, 2010 05:18 AM | |
| 07+ Owners with MAC Prochamber, need help. - CMC Forums | This thread | Refback | April 14th, 2010 05:11 AM | |
Threads Similar to: MAC Prochamber
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MAC LT's, O/R Prochamber, and MAC Cat-back. (Exhaust clip) | RAGEman | 99-04 | 19 | April 15th, 2008 01:21 AM |
| mac prochamber....mac h..both offroad whats the difference?? | twest | 99-04 | 11 | October 17th, 2007 03:43 PM |
| Mac ProChamber | RX Bandit | 2005 - 2010 | 4 | September 25th, 2007 06:28 PM |
| MAC Prochamber | handyandy | 99-04 | 8 | October 26th, 2006 10:46 PM |