| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
May 08 ROTM
2008 Audi S6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: S. Elgin
Posts: 6,684
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
dbling, I'm not here to argue. I see things differently in real world mechanical experience. I never put out there that psi was a measure of power, so I'm assuming that wasn't directed my way.
I think there is an agreement though about the entire topic: You play, you may have to pay. Could be now, could be later, could never be, but do you want to risk it, or build up properly? |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 143
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Emay,
I agree with you 100% on the issue. Its a matter of time before the engine will blow when you run your horsepower about 400. Takes more than just a turbo/supercharger to play with the big boys!
__________________
I hated Mustangs till I bought one!!! 2006 Mustang GT 300bhp 320 torque 2001 Audi TT 327bhp 321 torgue |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 285
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm supercharged and pulling 12lbs. of boost... 480rwhp 430rwtq
Runs good with no problems, I wonder if shifting @ 6800rpm's is bad on it?? I plan on buying a Livernois forged shortblock this winter.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Regular
2005 Roush GT
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sumter SC
Posts: 119
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Pro Charger
After first install and Dyno tune, Engine was putting out 489HP, tuner advised
that it "Should be ok" Opted to Down Tune it to 436RWHP. I don't beat on it and so far it runs like a dream. I still plan to upgrade the rotating part to forged when I get back from Iraq. I believe in better safe then sorry on the side of the road. |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Premium Member
|
good call... and FYI it is ok to start your own thread... make it home safe!!!
__________________
![]() 2.6l KENNE BELL 298 Stroker, Ported heads Pro Motion Built 3650/McLeod RST/ MGW Short Throw Long tube/O/R X /Borla Touring 8 rib/65 lb injectors/GT500 twin fuel ET Drag Slicks/3.73 gear Detroit Truetrac /CDC AGR Spoiler |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Regular
2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 279
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
+1
some people blow up their engines at 430 whp, some people run 500 and never have a problem
__________________
Stage II KB Griggs GR40 Front and Rear Suspension (Full Mod List in Garage) |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 768
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Umm this is just my .02 cents. But 50 PSI vs 5 PSI.. Even if they may for example get the you to the same HP. BUT if you think for a second.. PSI = Pounds per square inch, THERE for 50 PSI will creat more "Stress" then 5 PSI.. Right?
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Your Mom's Favorite
2007 Mustang GT
Eats Chevys, Shits Imports...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Scott AFB, Illinois
Posts: 2,490
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It's a drop in the bucket compred to the force generated by combustion, but would be indescribably inefficient. That is where ignition timing comes into play. To get the same power on the same octane fuel from these two theoretical setups, you would have to retard the timing 75-ish degrees off of what the 5psi setup was tuned to. If the 5 psi setup was tuned to 25* BTDC @ WOT, then to run the same octane fuel in the 50 psi setup, your timing (by the math, of course, becuse this car would be retardedly innefficient and probably have trouble running at all) would have to be retarded 75 degrees, or 50* into the downstroke BTDC. On 91 octane and 8 psi your WOT timing will be around 16* BTDC, and on 10 psi it will be around 14 * BTDC to make the same power. The 10psi and less timing is slightly less efficient but also slightly safer. Whatever boost is run, the tune's ignition timing has to match the intended octane. And even then, it's real easy to get a bad tank of gas. Moral of the story: Doesn't matter how much boost you run (whithin reason, obviously), because your tuner is limited by the octane available where you're at. This entire example was given without getting into heat generated by that much boost, etc...just as a simple "what if?", not a real world possibility.
__________________
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...p-vote-me.html ![]() TEAM RICER GT CREW MEMBER (11 SECOND RIDE WITH A 12 SECOND DRIVER) MEMBERS AGAINST MEMBERS AGAINST STUFF CREW FOUNDER TRUNK MONKEY CREW FOUNDER |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: How much power can a stock 05+ hold.
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| what is maximum power for stock engine ? | LM4600 | 99-04 | 3 | November 11th, 2007 08:25 PM |
| 2003 stock mach 460 amp power wire size | keith89 | Audio/Video | 2 | June 7th, 2007 08:24 AM |
| how much power can you make the t5 trans hold? | YNOT | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | May 25th, 2007 02:01 AM |
| Stock 5.0 Power? | burnout5.0 | 94-95 | 6 | February 8th, 2007 11:09 PM |
| Stock horse power info please | trebel14 | 5.0 Mustangs | 3 | July 25th, 2006 01:18 AM |