Twin Turbo 2006

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 11:45 AM

Just got done installing twin turbos on a 2006. Two GT28 and an air to water cooler. Car pulls real clean and tons of lowend power. Here is the dyno sheet. BTW how strong is the bottom end?

flattusmaximus78 · July 22nd, 2006, 01:48 PM

I'm guessing the low numbers ( not really low) are for your blocks sake?

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 03:52 PM

for 6.5 psi boost, stock cats and Exxon 93 octane fuel I think they are great numbers.

ckthecerealkiller · July 22nd, 2006, 03:55 PM

Originally Posted by mpinick

for 6.5 psi boost, stock cats and Exxon 93 octane fuel I think they are great numbers.

I guess that is pretty good numbers.

But why did you go TT. You coulda done that safely with one turbo.

Bigger boost for later maybe?

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 03:55 PM

I have no idea what the stock lower end can take. I would bet around 10-12 psi we would see 500whp or more.

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 04:00 PM

Originally Posted by ckthecerealkiller

Originally Posted by mpinick

for 6.5 psi boost, stock cats and Exxon 93 octane fuel I think they are great numbers.

I guess that is pretty good numbers.

But why did you go TT. You coulda done that safely with one turbo.

Bigger boost for later maybe?

I like the way two smaller turbos spool up. Plus the bigger turbo would have never fit under there anyway. This car has no less then 350 ftlbs at the wheel from 2,400 to 5,900. That is a very broad power band. Plus peak torque of 480 at the wheel at 3,650.

ckthecerealkiller · July 22nd, 2006, 04:06 PM

Originally Posted by mpinick

I like the way two smaller turbos spool up. Plus the bigger turbo would have never fit under there anyway. This car has no less then 350 ftlbs at the wheel from 2,400 to 5,900. That is a very broad power band. Plus peak torque of 480 at the wheel at 3,650.

The stock lower end can take about 450 horse. But that is a little pushy, other then that it looks good. Just seems like the TQ drops a little early, I don't see too many turbos that drop that quick, on a S/C yeah.

But anyway.......

ChrisJ · July 22nd, 2006, 04:10 PM

Awesome Numbers...

Drgnracin72 · July 22nd, 2006, 06:10 PM

a single turbo will fit under there, and was this on a dynojet or a mustang dyno? anyway, lets see some pics of the car!!

ChrisJ · July 22nd, 2006, 06:57 PM

Originally Posted by drgnracin72

a single turbo ill fit under there, and was thid on a dynojet or a mustang dyno? anyway, lets see some pics of the car!!

I second that motion...

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 08:17 PM

But that is a little pushy, other then that it looks good. Just seems like the TQ drops a little early, I don't see too many turbos that drop that quick, on a S/C yeah.

But anyway.......

[/quote]

The torque starts about 1,000 rpm sooner then the only other kit I have seen for the 05-06. Keep in mind that this is a street car with stock cats and 93 octane pump fuel. I would look more at how much power is made for the whole rpm band then just top end.

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 08:19 PM

Originally Posted by drgnracin72

a single turbo will fit under there, and was this on a dynojet or a mustang dyno? anyway, lets see some pics of the car!!

It was on a Dyno Jet. A bigger turbo will not fit where these are. Maybe back at the rear of the car but not by the back of the block. I do not like the rear mount turbos because of the lag and the long tubing.

ChrisJ · July 22nd, 2006, 08:22 PM

Originally Posted by mpinick

Originally Posted by drgnracin72

a single turbo will fit under there, and was this on a dynojet or a mustang dyno? anyway, lets see some pics of the car!!

It was on a Dyno Jet. A bigger turbo will not fit where these are. Maybe back at the rear of the car but not by the back of the block. I do not like the rear mount turbos because of the lag and the long tubing.

From what I have heard they are doing a good job of getting rid of some of the lag in the STS systems...

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by ChrisJ

Originally Posted by mpinick

Originally Posted by drgnracin72

a single turbo will fit under there, and was this on a dynojet or a mustang dyno? anyway, lets see some pics of the car!!

It was on a Dyno Jet. A bigger turbo will not fit where these are. Maybe back at the rear of the car but not by the back of the block. I do not like the rear mount turbos because of the lag and the long tubing.

From what I have heard they are doing a good job of getting rid of some of the lag in the STS systems...

They may have now. I can only tell you from the dyno sheet that I have seen on the website. The torque is 1,000 rpm later. Bigger turbos and longer tubing gets you more lag most of the time. Their numbers are great, big power from 4,500 on up. Must be a very fast drag car.

Drgnracin72 · July 22nd, 2006, 08:42 PM

the lag with the STS turbo is not nearly as bad as it seems. ive driven two cars that had sts trubos on them and there was no lag. and there are more than one to mount the turbo in the engine bay besides right at the back of the engine. dyno jets, give power ratings that are not real world. a mustang dyno gives real worl numbers. the mustang dyno can be set up to run with different variables like weight, aerodynamics and other things. dyno jets usually give off a number thats usually about 30-40 horses to high. what fuel mods did you do? and we want pics of the car and the engine not anymore of the dynographs!

Drgnracin72 · July 22nd, 2006, 08:43 PM

and also what turbos are used and who made the kit? and how much did everyhting form buying it to having it installed to getting it tuned cost?

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 08:52 PM

Originally Posted by drgnracin72

the lag with the STS turbo is not nearly as bad as it seems. ive driven two cars that had sts trubos on them and there was no lag. and there are more than one to mount the turbo in the engine bay besides right at the back of the engine. dyno jets, give power ratings that are not real world. a mustang dyno gives real worl numbers. the mustang dyno can be set up to run with different variables like weight, aerodynamics and other things. dyno jets usually give off a number thats usually about 30-40 horses to high. what fuel mods did you do? and we want pics of the car and the engine not anymore of the dynographs!

I have been told the one dyno does this over that one before for over ten years now. I have never seen any facts to back it up. As for 30-40 horse more I do not see it. What is the car and what was the power it made. I have seen Vipers dyno higher with Mustang dynos then the Dyno Jet. At the track the higher number car did not go faster,mph. Anyhow the STS was also dynoed with the same type Dyno-Jet, just like this car. So you can see where and how much power one car did over the other.

Drgnracin72 · July 22nd, 2006, 08:57 PM

ok do some research as to the mustang dyno vs. dy no jet and youll see what im talking about!!! and what about the other ?s i asked

mpinick · July 22nd, 2006, 08:58 PM

Originally Posted by drgnracin72

and also what turbos are used and who made the kit? and how much did everyhting form buying it to having it installed to getting it tuned cost?

GT28RS turbos, I made the system, install it , tuned it and dynoed it. This was done on a brand new 06 Stang that a Ford dealer will be selling as a dealer installed option. Maybe after break in the power will go up a little, maybe not. I do not know what they will be selling it for. If it is not raining it will go to Raceway Park this up coming week for testing.

Drgnracin72 · July 22nd, 2006, 09:00 PM

what shop do you work out of and where is it located? what did you use to tune it? and ford i seriously doubt is going to offer it as a dealer installed ooption! but please do prove me wrong cuz that would be kickass

July 22nd, 2006, 01:48 PM	#2
flattusmaximus78 I Post Entirely Way Too Much 1993 5.ohhhh 12.97 @140mph Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Gatorland Posts: 6,121 iTrader: 3 reviews	I'm guessing the low numbers ( not really low) are for your blocks sake? __________________ 02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed --Moates Quarter horse $225-- --Cobra intake $150-- --tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--

July 22nd, 2006, 04:10 PM	#8
ChrisJ RLY SRS Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Ft. Meade, MD Posts: 38,220 Blog Entries: 4 iTrader: 10 reviews	Awesome Numbers... __________________ 2008 Acura TL Type-S - 2008 EB Ford Expedition - 2002 Boosted GT - Sold Facebook Google+

July 22nd, 2006, 06:10 PM	#9
Drgnracin72 I Post Entirely Way Too Much Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: somewhere in oklahoma Posts: 10,635 iTrader: 2 reviews	a single turbo will fit under there, and was this on a dynojet or a mustang dyno? anyway, lets see some pics of the car!! __________________ RIP ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS

July 22nd, 2006, 08:42 PM	#15
Drgnracin72 I Post Entirely Way Too Much Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: somewhere in oklahoma Posts: 10,635 iTrader: 2 reviews	the lag with the STS turbo is not nearly as bad as it seems. ive driven two cars that had sts trubos on them and there was no lag. and there are more than one to mount the turbo in the engine bay besides right at the back of the engine. dyno jets, give power ratings that are not real world. a mustang dyno gives real worl numbers. the mustang dyno can be set up to run with different variables like weight, aerodynamics and other things. dyno jets usually give off a number thats usually about 30-40 horses to high. what fuel mods did you do? and we want pics of the car and the engine not anymore of the dynographs! __________________ RIP ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS

July 22nd, 2006, 08:43 PM	#16
Drgnracin72 I Post Entirely Way Too Much Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: somewhere in oklahoma Posts: 10,635 iTrader: 2 reviews	and also what turbos are used and who made the kit? and how much did everyhting form buying it to having it installed to getting it tuned cost? __________________ RIP ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS

July 22nd, 2006, 03:52 PM	#3
mpinick Newbie Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 25 iTrader: 0 reviews	for 6.5 psi boost, stock cats and Exxon 93 octane fuel I think they are great numbers.

July 22nd, 2006, 03:55 PM	#5
mpinick Newbie Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 25 iTrader: 0 reviews	I have no idea what the stock lower end can take. I would bet around 10-12 psi we would see 500whp or more.

July 22nd, 2006, 08:17 PM	#11
mpinick Newbie Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 25 iTrader: 0 reviews	But that is a little pushy, other then that it looks good. Just seems like the TQ drops a little early, I don't see too many turbos that drop that quick, on a S/C yeah. But anyway....... [/quote] The torque starts about 1,000 rpm sooner then the only other kit I have seen for the 05-06. Keep in mind that this is a street car with stock cats and 93 octane pump fuel. I would look more at how much power is made for the whole rpm band then just top end.

July 22nd, 2006, 08:57 PM	#18
Drgnracin72 I Post Entirely Way Too Much Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: somewhere in oklahoma Posts: 10,635 iTrader: 2 reviews	ok do some research as to the mustang dyno vs. dy no jet and youll see what im talking about!!! and what about the other ?s i asked __________________ RIP ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS

July 22nd, 2006, 09:00 PM	#20
Drgnracin72 I Post Entirely Way Too Much Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: somewhere in oklahoma Posts: 10,635 iTrader: 2 reviews	what shop do you work out of and where is it located? what did you use to tune it? and ford i seriously doubt is going to offer it as a dealer installed ooption! but please do prove me wrong cuz that would be kickass __________________ RIP ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

Threads Similar to: Twin Turbo 2006
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo	justinsstang	General Tech	24	March 7th, 2007 09:07 PM
Mellon's Twin Turbo Stealth vs Wills99z's Single Turbo z28	Mellon	Videos	10	December 30th, 2006 10:05 AM
2006 Twin Turbo Mustang GT	JohnnyZ	Multimedia	9	November 30th, 2006 06:52 PM
Turbo, Twin Turbo, Procharger, or Kennebell?	black94gt	5.0 Mustangs	19	October 7th, 2006 10:41 AM
Super Charger vs Turbo/Twin Turbo: Pros and Cons of each	FireryDriver	2005 - 2010	9	September 17th, 2006 04:15 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.