| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
I wouldn't put more than 460rwhp. They can take more than 430, as long as you have an excellent tune.
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT
10.32@137.70
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LSU Country
Posts: 2,774
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
they don't recommend it because they have a lot of belt slip issues when they try running some boost through it, plus that magnacharger is an hEATON based design(ROOTS) so it isn't very efficient.
__________________
350 rwhp and 310 rwtq at 6000 rpms through stock exhaust system 326 cubic inches of Twin Turbocharged hell will be running soonTuned by Wes @ TPS ![]() |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
whipple!!
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT
10.32@137.70
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LSU Country
Posts: 2,774
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
350 rwhp and 310 rwtq at 6000 rpms through stock exhaust system 326 cubic inches of Twin Turbocharged hell will be running soonTuned by Wes @ TPS ![]() |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 764
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I think!!! |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT
10.32@137.70
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LSU Country
Posts: 2,774
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i am sorry, i miss read the post and thought it was in reference to there supercharger, i did a lot of reading and waiting for there supercharger and was planning on getting it till i seen it and talked to someone that used to work there. he told me that for what i eventually wanted to end up with there ste up wasn't gonna cut it.
i think 450 rwhp is the limit for 06+ 3v's
__________________
350 rwhp and 310 rwtq at 6000 rpms through stock exhaust system 326 cubic inches of Twin Turbocharged hell will be running soonTuned by Wes @ TPS ![]() |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT
10.32@137.70
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LSU Country
Posts: 2,774
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
it doesn't mean much in the lower boost applications, 8-15 psi. but when you start running 20-25 psi. it does make a difference.
but there are no significant differences, both have the best intercooling systems for the twinscrew superchargers
__________________
350 rwhp and 310 rwtq at 6000 rpms through stock exhaust system 326 cubic inches of Twin Turbocharged hell will be running soonTuned by Wes @ TPS ![]() |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,874
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Either the Whipple or KB kit would be badass, but I wouldn't push more the 9psi on stock internals.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Whipple or kenne bell
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which One... (Whipple or Kenne Bell) | mustangrebuilder | General Tech | 13 | November 29th, 2007 09:09 AM |
| Kenne Bell | hellbred07 | 2005 - 2010 | 34 | November 9th, 2007 06:33 PM |
| clutch change with whipple,kenne bell, roush | 05mustang_TT_charged | 2005 - 2010 | 15 | July 15th, 2007 11:25 AM |
| kenne bell | punkafi888 | General Tech | 43 | April 4th, 2007 03:52 PM |
| Kenne Bell | 03blownmach1 | 99-04 | 11 | June 28th, 2006 01:04 AM |