| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
BBR products
Anyone using BBR products. They seem to be the most aggressive as far as Cams I like their stage 2 cams, sound nice and mean. I read on another forum though that they were originally using regrinds and they were not working out well in the long run. I have seen that they now offer new grinds so I am assuming the new grinds would be safe to use correct? I am thinking about the following set-up. But wanted to get the advice of some people with the BBR products first. Tell me what you think.
C&L racer intake bbk 62mm TB steeda uD pulleys steeda race delete plates Kooks LTw highflow catted X BBR ported Heads BBR stg.2 cams 4.10s spec stg. 3 clutch che LCAs che UCA che panhard rod
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae Last edited by 05roush0090; March 14th, 2008 at 06:19 PM. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
05_mustang_kb_charged is using their stage II cams along with a few of their other products.
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
oh and
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
Take the BBK TB out of there. Not worth the hassle on our cars. Stock TB are good untill 500hp if I'm not mistaken.
__________________
07 GT-- Gone But Not Forgotten Military Crew E-5
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thanks, I seen he had some trouble tuning it. was it a hard tune or was it mechanical error, couldnt really tell from the post for sure.
500hp to the crank or RWHP?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,391
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
500rwhp is where the stock TB restricts sufficient airflow...not an exact number, but a ballpark
__________________
![]() Under Construction |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thanks I dont think I will be anywhere near that number Iwould be happy to get around 400rwhp so I geuss I dont need the tb after all.
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Mickey. the link in your sig isnt working.
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
Another thing I would look at is upgrading to higher capacity injectors and either a BAP or GT500 fuel pumps because at around 400hp is when you start running out of fuel.
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I was about to ask that next. How about the BAP and 39lb injectors. you think that would be sufficient and reliable?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
Yeah I think so. I still don't like the BAP though. It's half assing it IMO. I would do GT500 fuel pumps if it were my car.
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
looks good dude. As for the TB, i know it can be a pain if not done right, but i have seen dynos with cams and ported heads like your doing where the TB adds another 10 hp and added power throughout the powerband adds mid range TQ as well. They put it on the gains were there, took it off the gains went away. With the heads, cams and delete plates your at the point that the TB can help.
Anyways will be a bad ass ride man. As for your question about them using regrinds, i heard they still do. i was researching cams for the last few months, but that could be old info. I never heard anyone with them complain about them. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
they are offering new grind billet cams now also. I think I will go with the new grind cam. You know any thing about the cam phaser lockouts? I hear they prevent alot ofthe VCT issues with the more aggressive cams. I am not sure on how the work though, can you explain it a little better?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Explain it in what way? they are basically disableing the VCT right? locking the cam phaser in fully retarded or fully advanced posisition. To avoid clearance issues cuased by vavle float with the vct and aftermarket cams. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
here you go this if from a guy named mike@livernios, he answered your question in another furum. Here is the link if you want to read that whole thread. Cam phaser -vs- lockout and degreeing R&D info...Anyone - Page 5 - ModularFords.com
Here are his comments. Sorry for not getting in on this sooner with some info. I have been very busy at the shop. Anyways, as stated in some previous posts its important to keep in mind the difference between crankshaft degrees and camshaft degrees since they are different and that is a point of confusion for many people. The initital purpose of these lockouts was for nothing more than to eliminate the problems that we had seen with the stock phaser when used in conjunction with aftermarket springs and cam profiles. After numerous tests were completed, we found that in most cases the chance of the phaser failing at some point in time were very high when aftermarket spring pressures were used. As a previous poster explained, the cam phaser operates directly off oil pressure acting on a series of plates. This pressure is fed to either side of these inner plates or vanes and this is what controls the internal rotation of the gear independent from the outer cam gear. The only easy way to make the phaser work better in these situations where higher load capabilites are required is to up the oil pressure. The problem is that the system and solenoid that controls this is not designed to handle higher than factory pressures and still work correctly. The system has enough problems on its own in stock form. This is evident by the Ford TSBs that relate to it and the constant revisions of phasers from Ford. The first phasers that came on a lot of 2005 cars were suffix number DA, these were subsequently followed by revisions EA, FA, GA and finally HA which is the current revised part if memory serves me. This phaser has had issues from the first cars that rolled off the line, and still even today we will get a bone stock car that has issues with the phasers making noise. The real intent of the lockout is to eliminate any of these possible issues. It was not originally intended for power gains. In most cases a lot of the aftermarket cam profiles require a stiffer spring. Based on this, it seems apparent that without some modification to the phasers or switching to a fixed or adjustable gear that issues will arise. We offer the lockouts in two different versions because we have seen in some testing that higher hp cars that make more power with a slight bit of retard going on. In most cases though, as with any changes in cam timing the results tend to depend on the specific combination instead of one generalized rule. We have gone with the standard lockout for about 98% of applications and always had good results. The increase in throttle response is also noticalbe and is a nice side effect. But again the purpose of the lockouts is not as much a power related issue as it is a durability related one. Like previous posters have listed, there can be disasterous results in certain applications when the phasers are left as stock. We have seen this ourselves as well. Usually this will start off as a noise which gets progressivly worse. After a while if left unchecked this can result of failure of the phaser and corresponding engine damage. This is why we made these lockouts. They were a simple solution to a problem that we and others were having with the phasers. As far as where to degree cams in when using the lockouts that would be something that I would get with the specific maker of the camshaft for. Whatever they tell you is probably where you ought to start out at. I am not sure if this info helped anybody or not. I can always answer specific questions if needed just let me know and I will do what I can to help. Thanks Mike |
|
|
|
#16 | ||||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT
10.32@137.70
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LSU Country
Posts: 2,774
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I also have a set of the Livernois Lock outs I can sell you for $25. I used the lock out hub from BBR which was $385. The Livernois ones only let you do a full retard or full advance of the cams. The hub lets you degree the cams in which BBR recommends but not completely necessary. They have plenty of people running the cams and stiffer valve springs and still using the VCT. You can easily pick up 25 rwhp and as much torque by playing with the VCT when tuning. I just preferred not to hassel with any of it for my build. The tune is as simple as going into the VCT tables and zeroing everything out.
__________________
350 rwhp and 310 rwtq at 6000 rpms through stock exhaust system 326 cubic inches of Twin Turbocharged hell will be running soonTuned by Wes @ TPS ![]() |
||||
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2007 GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Not trying to talk you in or out of any cams just thought id share the info i had since i spent the last 4 months shopping for cams.
here is a dyno sheet from bbr's website of a car with their stage II cams and heads. below that is my car with just NSR comp cams, also you could go to brenspeeds site, they have two different dyno sheets for comp stage III nsr cams one on a manual and one on a automatic. if you google it you could find two more dyno sheets that i found what i was looking that have about the same results on the comp cams. I always wondered why bbr says they average 275 with those heads and cams, but post a dyno sheet of a car making 250? even if it did make 275, is the added cost of the springs, heads, and labor worth 25? that has to total at least 4000 for 25hp. Maybe they could explain all that, just thought id throw it out there. ![]()
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Enthusiast
2005 Mustang GT Roush
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Perhaps I should just get a blower and some suspension. Looking like I could save a little cash that way. I love the sound of a nice lopey cam though. Why cant the prices come down on the ported heads and cams!!!
Perhaps they will before I get the cash saved up, if not I might be after a Kenne Belle and some suspension mods.
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090 DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune, 10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae |
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Regular
|
If your thinking Supercharger,I would recomend the Whipple....check it out....
![]()
__________________
"Drive it like you stole it"
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: BBR products
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UPR products? | energiesource | 99-04 | 7 | August 6th, 2007 01:38 AM |
| No No Products! | oldernewbie | The Clubhouse | 21 | March 3rd, 2007 08:14 PM |
| SHM products? | energiesource | 99-04 | 6 | December 27th, 2006 01:51 PM |
| wax products | o3gtdgs | 99-04 | 5 | December 14th, 2006 09:32 PM |