BBR products
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 2005 - 2010

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old March 14th, 2008, 06:17 PM   #1
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

BBR products


Anyone using BBR products. They seem to be the most aggressive as far as Cams I like their stage 2 cams, sound nice and mean. I read on another forum though that they were originally using regrinds and they were not working out well in the long run. I have seen that they now offer new grinds so I am assuming the new grinds would be safe to use correct? I am thinking about the following set-up. But wanted to get the advice of some people with the BBR products first. Tell me what you think.

C&L racer intake
bbk 62mm TB
steeda uD pulleys
steeda race delete plates
Kooks LTw highflow catted X
BBR ported Heads
BBR stg.2 cams
4.10s
spec stg. 3 clutch
che LCAs
che UCA
che panhard rod
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae

Last edited by 05roush0090; March 14th, 2008 at 06:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old March 14th, 2008, 06:20 PM   #2
One Man Wolf Pack
 
06RedfireGT's Avatar
 
2006 Mustang GT
13ish....maybe
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Regulatin On Some OGs
Posts: 22,484
06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 06RedfireGT
Default

05_mustang_kb_charged is using their stage II cams along with a few of their other products.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 06:20 PM   #3
One Man Wolf Pack
 
06RedfireGT's Avatar
 
2006 Mustang GT
13ish....maybe
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Regulatin On Some OGs
Posts: 22,484
06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 06RedfireGT
Default

oh and
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 06:26 PM   #4
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
usafimj's Avatar
 
2007 Ford Mustang GT
12.847 @ 114.12mph
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oklahoma City, Ok.
Posts: 5,086
usafimj is a glorious beacon of lightusafimj is a glorious beacon of lightusafimj is a glorious beacon of lightusafimj is a glorious beacon of lightusafimj is a glorious beacon of light
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to usafimj
Default

Take the BBK TB out of there. Not worth the hassle on our cars. Stock TB are good untill 500hp if I'm not mistaken.
__________________
07 GT-- Gone But Not Forgotten
Military Crew
E-5

  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 06:47 PM   #5
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 06RedfireGT View Post
oh and
Thanks, I seen he had some trouble tuning it. was it a hard tune or was it mechanical error, couldnt really tell from the post for sure.

Originally Posted by usafimj View Post
Take the BBK TB out of there. Not worth the hassle on our cars. Stock TB are good untill 500hp if I'm not mistaken.
500hp to the crank or RWHP?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 06:55 PM   #6
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,391
Mickey is a splendid one to beholdMickey is a splendid one to beholdMickey is a splendid one to beholdMickey is a splendid one to beholdMickey is a splendid one to beholdMickey is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

500rwhp is where the stock TB restricts sufficient airflow...not an exact number, but a ballpark
__________________


Under Construction
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 07:02 PM   #7
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Thanks I dont think I will be anywhere near that number Iwould be happy to get around 400rwhp so I geuss I dont need the tb after all.
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 07:03 PM   #8
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Mickey. the link in your sig isnt working.
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 07:18 PM   #9
One Man Wolf Pack
 
06RedfireGT's Avatar
 
2006 Mustang GT
13ish....maybe
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Regulatin On Some OGs
Posts: 22,484
06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 06RedfireGT
Default

Another thing I would look at is upgrading to higher capacity injectors and either a BAP or GT500 fuel pumps because at around 400hp is when you start running out of fuel.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 07:40 PM   #10
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I was about to ask that next. How about the BAP and 39lb injectors. you think that would be sufficient and reliable?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 07:46 PM   #11
One Man Wolf Pack
 
06RedfireGT's Avatar
 
2006 Mustang GT
13ish....maybe
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Regulatin On Some OGs
Posts: 22,484
06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute06RedfireGT has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 06RedfireGT
Default

Yeah I think so. I still don't like the BAP though. It's half assing it IMO. I would do GT500 fuel pumps if it were my car.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 07:51 PM   #12
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
2007 GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

looks good dude. As for the TB, i know it can be a pain if not done right, but i have seen dynos with cams and ported heads like your doing where the TB adds another 10 hp and added power throughout the powerband adds mid range TQ as well. They put it on the gains were there, took it off the gains went away. With the heads, cams and delete plates your at the point that the TB can help.

Anyways will be a bad ass ride man.

As for your question about them using regrinds, i heard they still do.
i was researching cams for the last few months, but that could be old info. I never heard anyone with them complain about them.
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 08:06 PM   #13
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

they are offering new grind billet cams now also. I think I will go with the new grind cam. You know any thing about the cam phaser lockouts? I hear they prevent alot ofthe VCT issues with the more aggressive cams. I am not sure on how the work though, can you explain it a little better?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 08:15 PM   #14
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
2007 GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 05roush0090 View Post
they are offering new grind billet cams now also. I think I will go with the new grind cam. You know any thing about the cam phaser lockouts? I hear they prevent alot ofthe VCT issues with the more aggressive cams. I am not sure on how the work though, can you explain it a little better?

Explain it in what way? they are basically disableing the VCT right? locking the cam phaser in fully retarded or fully advanced posisition. To avoid clearance issues cuased by vavle float with the vct and aftermarket cams.
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 08:37 PM   #15
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
2007 GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

here you go this if from a guy named mike@livernios, he answered your question in another furum. Here is the link if you want to read that whole thread. Cam phaser -vs- lockout and degreeing R&D info...Anyone - Page 5 - ModularFords.com

Here are his comments.

Sorry for not getting in on this sooner with some info. I have been very busy at the shop.

Anyways, as stated in some previous posts its important to keep in mind the difference between crankshaft degrees and camshaft degrees since they are different and that is a point of confusion for many people.

The initital purpose of these lockouts was for nothing more than to eliminate the problems that we had seen with the stock phaser when used in conjunction with aftermarket springs and cam profiles. After numerous tests were completed, we found that in most cases the chance of the phaser failing at some point in time were very high when aftermarket spring pressures were used. As a previous poster explained, the cam phaser operates directly off oil pressure acting on a series of plates. This pressure is fed to either side of these inner plates or vanes and this is what controls the internal rotation of the gear independent from the outer cam gear. The only easy way to make the phaser work better in these situations where higher load capabilites are required is to up the oil pressure. The problem is that the system and solenoid that controls this is not designed to handle higher than factory pressures and still work correctly. The system has enough problems on its own in stock form. This is evident by the Ford TSBs that relate to it and the constant revisions of phasers from Ford.

The first phasers that came on a lot of 2005 cars were suffix number DA, these were subsequently followed by revisions EA, FA, GA and finally HA which is the current revised part if memory serves me. This phaser has had issues from the first cars that rolled off the line, and still even today we will get a bone stock car that has issues with the phasers making noise.

The real intent of the lockout is to eliminate any of these possible issues. It was not originally intended for power gains. In most cases a lot of the aftermarket cam profiles require a stiffer spring. Based on this, it seems apparent that without some modification to the phasers or switching to a fixed or adjustable gear that issues will arise. We offer the lockouts in two different versions because we have seen in some testing that higher hp cars that make more power with a slight bit of retard going on. In most cases though, as with any changes in cam timing the results tend to depend on the specific combination instead of one generalized rule.

We have gone with the standard lockout for about 98% of applications and always had good results. The increase in throttle response is also noticalbe and is a nice side effect. But again the purpose of the lockouts is not as much a power related issue as it is a durability related one. Like previous posters have listed, there can be disasterous results in certain applications when the phasers are left as stock. We have seen this ourselves as well. Usually this will start off as a noise which gets progressivly worse. After a while if left unchecked this can result of failure of the phaser and corresponding engine damage. This is why we made these lockouts. They were a simple solution to a problem that we and others were having with the phasers.

As far as where to degree cams in when using the lockouts that would be something that I would get with the specific maker of the camshaft for. Whatever they tell you is probably where you ought to start out at.

I am not sure if this info helped anybody or not. I can always answer specific questions if needed just let me know and I will do what I can to help.

Thanks

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 09:48 PM   #16
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
05mustang_TT_charged's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT
10.32@137.70
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LSU Country
Posts: 2,774
05mustang_TT_charged is a jewel in the rough05mustang_TT_charged is a jewel in the rough05mustang_TT_charged is a jewel in the rough05mustang_TT_charged is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 05roush0090 View Post
Anyone using BBR products. They seem to be the most aggressive as far as Cams I like their stage 2 cams, sound nice and mean. I read on another forum though that they were originally using regrinds and they were not working out well in the long run. I have seen that they now offer new grinds so I am assuming the new grinds would be safe to use correct? I am thinking about the following set-up. But wanted to get the advice of some people with the BBR products first. Tell me what you think.

C&L racer intake----Get it
bbk 62mm TB----Don't waste your time with it, Get a factory GT500 one
steeda uD pulleys----Get it
steeda race delete plates----Get it
Kooks LTw highflow catted X----Get it
BBR ported Heads----No, Livernois Stage 3 outflows all others
BBR stg.2 cams----Get it, awesome sound
4.10s----If staying NA or Centrifugal Supercharger or Turbo
spec stg. 3 clutch----Get the 3+ a little extra money but worth it and make sure it is an 11"
che LCAs----Get it
che UCA----Get it
che panhard rod
----Get it

Originally Posted by 05roush0090 View Post
Thanks, I seen he had some trouble tuning it. was it a hard tune or was it mechanical error, couldnt really tell from the post for sure.
It was the missing cam phasers that did me in.The TB and cams are worth it as an upgrade.

500hp to the crank or RWHP?
With out FI, I would say crank
Originally Posted by 05roush0090 View Post
I was about to ask that next. How about the BAP and 39lb injectors. you think that would be sufficient and reliable?
I have a set of 39lbs injectors you can have. BAP works fine and reliable.
Originally Posted by 05roush0090 View Post
they are offering new grind billet cams now also. I think I will go with the new grind cam. You know any thing about the cam phaser lockouts? I hear they prevent alot ofthe VCT issues with the more aggressive cams. I am not sure on how the work though, can you explain it a little better?
The Billet are $999 and regrind are $650. I went with the Billet since they had a set on the shelf for someone else. If you want the billet they are usually a 2 week wait. I have seen plenty of people running the regrinds with out any problems but you do have to put a shim under the lifter
Originally Posted by 07stanggt View Post
Explain it in what way? they are basically disableing the VCT right? locking the cam phaser in fully retarded or fully advanced posisition. To avoid clearance issues cuased by vavle float with the vct and aftermarket cams.
I also have a set of the Livernois Lock outs I can sell you for $25. I used the lock out hub from BBR which was $385. The Livernois ones only let you do a full retard or full advance of the cams. The hub lets you degree the cams in which BBR recommends but not completely necessary. They have plenty of people running the cams and stiffer valve springs and still using the VCT. You can easily pick up 25 rwhp and as much torque by playing with the VCT when tuning. I just preferred not to hassel with any of it for my build. The tune is as simple as going into the VCT tables and zeroing everything out.
__________________
350 rwhp and 310 rwtq at 6000 rpms through stock exhaust system
326 cubic inches of Twin Turbocharged hell will be running soon
Tuned by Wes @ TPS
  Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2008, 01:40 AM   #17
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
2007 GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Not trying to talk you in or out of any cams just thought id share the info i had since i spent the last 4 months shopping for cams.

here is a dyno sheet from bbr's website of a car with their stage II cams and heads. below that is my car with just NSR comp cams, also you could go to brenspeeds site, they have two different dyno sheets for comp stage III nsr cams one on a manual and one on a automatic. if you google it you could find two more dyno sheets that i found what i was looking that have about the same results on the comp cams.

I always wondered why bbr says they average 275 with those heads and cams, but post a dyno sheet of a car making 250? even if it did make 275, is the added cost of the springs, heads, and labor worth 25? that has to total at least 4000 for 25hp.

Maybe they could explain all that, just thought id throw it out there.





  Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2008, 10:35 AM   #18
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 05mustang_kb_charged View Post
----


I have a set of 39lbs injectors you can have. BAP works fine and reliable.

I also have a set of the Livernois Lock outs I can sell you for $25. I used the lock out hub from BBR which was $385. The Livernois ones only let you do a full retard or full advance of the cams. The hub lets you degree the cams in which BBR recommends but not completely necessary. They have plenty of people running the cams and stiffer valve springs and still using the VCT. You can easily pick up 25 rwhp and as much torque by playing with the VCT when tuning. I just preferred not to hassel with any of it for my build. The tune is as simple as going into the VCT tables and zeroing everything out.
Does BBr say what degree to set the cams at?
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2008, 12:41 PM   #19
Enthusiast
 
05roush0090's Avatar
 
2005 Mustang GT Roush
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 735
05roush0090 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Perhaps I should just get a blower and some suspension. Looking like I could save a little cash that way. I love the sound of a nice lopey cam though. Why cant the prices come down on the ported heads and cams!!! Perhaps they will before I get the cash saved up, if not I might be after a Kenne Belle and some suspension mods.
__________________
2005 BLACK Mustang GT Roush #05-0090
DOB manifold, m122 SC, gt500 TB, 52lbers, KB BAP, AFCO HE,Brisk plugs, Mac Lt's, Off road x, Roush TVS CAI, Detroit rocker sc grind cams, Brenspeed 93 tune,
10 psi (2.875" pulley) 470rwhp-419ftlbs sae
  Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2008, 03:18 PM   #20
Regular
 
aleykat271's Avatar
 
2008 GT 5Spd
13.7 102.39
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kissimmee,Florida
Posts: 462
aleykat271 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to aleykat271
Default

If your thinking Supercharger,I would recomend the Whipple....check it out....
Originally Posted by 05roush0090 View Post
Perhaps I should just get a blower and some suspension. Looking like I could save a little cash that way. I love the sound of a nice lopey cam though. Why cant the prices come down on the ported heads and cams!!! Perhaps they will before I get the cash saved up, if not I might be after a Kenne Belle and some suspension mods.
__________________
"Drive it like you stole it"
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: BBR products
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPR products? energiesource 99-04 7 August 6th, 2007 01:38 AM
No No Products! oldernewbie The Clubhouse 21 March 3rd, 2007 08:14 PM
SHM products? energiesource 99-04 6 December 27th, 2006 01:51 PM
wax products o3gtdgs 99-04 5 December 14th, 2006 09:32 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.