|
|
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Blogs | Garage | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Insurance |
| | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
July 27th, 2008, 12:36 AM
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,571
 iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Tq tune outperforms race tune at the 1/8 mile track.
I took my car to the 1/8 mile track today. The DA was around 3800' My first two runs I had Doug's 91 race tune. My times were:
60' 2.371 E.T 9.347 MPH 80.411 Sea level corrected: 8.9132 at 84.376 Next run: 60' 2.257 E.T 9.297 MPH: 78.007 corrected: 8.8657 at 82 MPH Here are my times with the tq tune: Best time: 60' 1.980 E.T 8.970 MPH: 80.885 corrected: 8.553 at 84.9 MPH Next run: 60' 2.203 E.T 9.188 MPH: 80.231 corrected: 8.761 at 84.2 MPH
__________________
RIP 06 Mustang GT New Ride 04 GTO K&N intake, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Magnaflow catted X, Flow 40s, MS3 Cam and dynotuned by Texas Speed. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
July 27th, 2008, 12:37 AM
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
2006 Mustang GT 6spd
12.61@109mph
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,181
iTrader: 0 reviews
 |
interesting indeed....now check it out in the 1/4 mile then we'll see if that still holds true...but good times bro
__________________
 JLT CAI: KOOKS LT's: Comp NSR II's: 4.56's: TR6060: Steeda LCA, UCA: QA1's: Roush rear springs...see garage for more. |
|
|
|
July 27th, 2008, 12:43 AM
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,571
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
That would be interesting. My money would be on the race tune since it has more tq above 3,000 RPMs, but you never know. If the ass dyno was any indicator, I thought the race tune was going to be faster.
__________________
RIP 06 Mustang GT New Ride 04 GTO K&N intake, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Magnaflow catted X, Flow 40s, MS3 Cam and dynotuned by Texas Speed. |
|
|
|
July 27th, 2008, 12:50 AM
|
#4 |
|
MM Fanatic
2006 Mustang GT 6spd
12.61@109mph
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,181
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
interesting how that works isn't it?? haha
__________________
JLT CAI: KOOKS LT's: Comp NSR II's: 4.56's: TR6060: Steeda LCA, UCA: QA1's: Roush rear springs...see garage for more. |
|
|
|
July 27th, 2008, 12:52 AM
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,571
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It is. I think I may just leave the tq tune in.
__________________
RIP 06 Mustang GT New Ride 04 GTO K&N intake, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Magnaflow catted X, Flow 40s, MS3 Cam and dynotuned by Texas Speed. |
|
|
|
July 28th, 2008, 05:16 PM
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,571
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I talked to Alex at Bamachips and he said because of the throttle response the race tune should have been faster.
__________________
RIP 06 Mustang GT New Ride 04 GTO K&N intake, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Magnaflow catted X, Flow 40s, MS3 Cam and dynotuned by Texas Speed. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Tq tune outperforms race tune at the 1/8 mile track.
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Going for my race tune | 1SLO85 | 99-04 | 23 | January 16th, 2012 01:44 PM |
| Bama Race Tune | usafimj | 2005 - 2010 | 32 | June 9th, 2010 05:56 PM |
| difference between race tune and 93 tune | samstang | 2005 - 2010 | 9 | February 19th, 2008 08:33 AM |
| 93 race tune | bren-stang | 2005 - 2010 | 5 | January 18th, 2008 06:01 PM |
| Who has the best race tune? | Modern_Muscle | 2005 - 2010 | 17 | June 2nd, 2007 06:56 PM |
