Dyno Results?

j3susfr3ak · July 16th, 2007, 06:32 PM

wow brother, I havent been around for real long time but I KNOW that is way off. When I had nothin but bolt-ons I did better than that, I can tell that judging by all the responses youve received you should definitely go get your s*** checked out.... cuz that just AINT right

HMUSN · July 16th, 2007, 06:34 PM

^ I like the user name

j3susfr3ak · July 16th, 2007, 06:36 PM

thanx broheim

Wally1968 · July 18th, 2007, 03:08 AM

Here is the graph I said I would post of the dyno result. I'm not sure if you can make this out or not.

DrHolliday · July 18th, 2007, 03:44 AM

Thats not the type of graph you should have... And those numbers are off.

He should have given you a graph with HP, Torque, RPM and A/F ratio.

All I have to say is thats weird... Thats like diesel numbers, lol.

GTNorm · July 18th, 2007, 11:07 AM

Makes me wonder if he knew how to operate the equipment. It almost looks like he did the run in the wrong gear.I was told 4th gear is 1 to 1 ratio and that is where they do the run. Your car can't be that different and the hp and torque are so far apart.

acehogg69 · July 18th, 2007, 11:17 AM

Yeah something is jacked up. Go elsewhere for a dyno tune.

mikedoogen · July 18th, 2007, 11:18 AM

no i think i got it. he prob said you made 281 hp before the supercharger and 281 is a very good stock number. then he prob said you made 408 after the supercharger install and besides your torque most likely should be lower than your horsepower after a supercharger install. This is the only way it would make sense to me.

Wally1968 · July 19th, 2007, 02:22 AM

Hey GTNorm. The guy did red line in 4th gear. I just don't know what to make of this test.

05mustang_kb_charged · July 21st, 2007, 12:47 AM

[quote="mikedoogen"]no i think i got it. he prob said you made 281 hp before the supercharger and 281 is a very good stock number. then he prob said you made 408 after the supercharger install and besides your torque most likely should be lower than your horsepower after a supercharger install. This is the only way it would make sense to me.[/quote

the torque is usually higher or close to the same hp on the twinscrew and roots cars because they make boost so low in the rpm range, it also has to do with timing and fuel curves, my car was making 464 rwtq at 2100 rpm and topped at 502 at 3800 rpm. a centrifugal car usually has a lower torque number, the graph is definitly not the right one, instead of mph they should show rpm

GTNorm · July 21st, 2007, 11:04 AM

Wally....if it was me...I'd print out this thread and take it to the dyno guy and ask him to splain it. The results just don't seem possible and if he's a descent guy he'll probably retest it just to see if his equipment has lost calibration. Norm

TheUNZippee! · July 21st, 2007, 11:11 AM

Wally. How does the car feel? Is it much faster, and is it running ok? If I were you, I would do as Norm says. I would also take the time to research some other dyno numbers for similarily equipped cars to bring & show him. Our cars with 8-10 lbs. boost on a s/c will typically pick up roughly 100 hp at the wheels. I'm probably pushing almost 300 to the wheels with mine, and all I have done is CAI, a good tune, and exhaust.

Regency 2007 · July 21st, 2007, 11:21 AM

Originally Posted by TheUNZippee!

Wally. How does the car feel? Is it much faster, and is it running ok? If I were you, I would do as Norm says. I would also take the time to research some other dyno numbers for similarily equipped cars to bring & show him. Our cars with 8-10 lbs. boost on a s/c will typically pick up roughly 100 hp at the wheels. I'm probably pushing almost 300 to the wheels with mine, and all I have done is CAI, a good tune, and exhaust.

That statement will vary, I have a turbo with 7 lbs of boost right now and gained over 150 at the wheels and that was in a 103 degree shop with conservative tune.

TheUNZippee! · July 21st, 2007, 11:25 AM

Yeah that's why I said roughly.

flattusmaximus78 · July 22nd, 2007, 06:17 PM

Regency you ever get you car running right?

Mrbonesaw · November 21st, 2007, 02:21 PM

So what's up with this? You can't just leave us hanging. WTF was the end result??????

July 16th, 2007, 06:32 PM	#21
j3susfr3ak Regular 2005 GT convertible. Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 141	wow brother, I havent been around for real long time but I KNOW that is way off. When I had nothin but bolt-ons I did better than that, I can tell that judging by all the responses youve received you should definitely go get your s*** checked out.... cuz that just AINT right __________________ "The deeper that sorrow carves into your being, the more joy you can contain". Kahlil Gibrahn "Ima come at you like a spider monkey" - Ricky Bobby Jr.

July 16th, 2007, 06:36 PM	#23
j3susfr3ak Regular 2005 GT convertible. Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 141	thanx broheim __________________ "The deeper that sorrow carves into your being, the more joy you can contain". Kahlil Gibrahn "Ima come at you like a spider monkey" - Ricky Bobby Jr.

July 18th, 2007, 03:44 AM	#25
DrHolliday Enthusiast Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Port, NC Posts: 717	Thats not the type of graph you should have... And those numbers are off. He should have given you a graph with HP, Torque, RPM and A/F ratio. All I have to say is thats weird... Thats like diesel numbers, lol. __________________ Mustangless atm 2006 2500 HD Diesel. Built allison trans and other goodies

July 18th, 2007, 11:07 AM	#26
GTNorm Enthusiast Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 503	Makes me wonder if he knew how to operate the equipment. It almost looks like he did the run in the wrong gear.I was told 4th gear is 1 to 1 ratio and that is where they do the run. Your car can't be that different and the hp and torque are so far apart. __________________ A man with experience is never at the mercy of a man with a theory.

July 18th, 2007, 11:17 AM	#27
acehogg69 Hardcore Enthusiast 06 GT with bolt ons I sucked Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Cheese country!! aka WI Posts: 1,091	Yeah something is jacked up. Go elsewhere for a dyno tune. __________________ Kyle Busch Haters Club!! Member Uno! Tony wrote "Blowers blow, turbos suck, and nitrous rules!!! lol " Borla cattless L/T's topped with Flowmasters , Roush short throw, JLT2 CAI w/ X-CAL2 from Brenspeed, Bullit 18X9 and 18X10 deep dish.

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement

July 18th, 2007, 11:18 AM	#28
mikedoogen Regular Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 128	no i think i got it. he prob said you made 281 hp before the supercharger and 281 is a very good stock number. then he prob said you made 408 after the supercharger install and besides your torque most likely should be lower than your horsepower after a supercharger install. This is the only way it would make sense to me.

July 19th, 2007, 02:22 AM	#29
Wally1968 Regular Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 92	Hey GTNorm. The guy did red line in 4th gear. I just don't know what to make of this test.

July 21st, 2007, 12:47 AM	#30
05mustang_kb_charged Hardcore Enthusiast 2005 Mustang GT 10.32@137.70 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: LSU Country Posts: 2,439	[quote="mikedoogen"]no i think i got it. he prob said you made 281 hp before the supercharger and 281 is a very good stock number. then he prob said you made 408 after the supercharger install and besides your torque most likely should be lower than your horsepower after a supercharger install. This is the only way it would make sense to me.[/quote the torque is usually higher or close to the same hp on the twinscrew and roots cars because they make boost so low in the rpm range, it also has to do with timing and fuel curves, my car was making 464 rwtq at 2100 rpm and topped at 502 at 3800 rpm. a centrifugal car usually has a lower torque number, the graph is definitly not the right one, instead of mph they should show rpm

July 21st, 2007, 11:04 AM	#31
GTNorm Enthusiast Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 503	Wally....if it was me...I'd print out this thread and take it to the dyno guy and ask him to splain it. The results just don't seem possible and if he's a descent guy he'll probably retest it just to see if his equipment has lost calibration. Norm __________________ A man with experience is never at the mercy of a man with a theory.

July 22nd, 2007, 06:17 PM	#35
flattusmaximus78 MM Fanatic 1993 5.ohhhh 14.47 at 96 mph Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Gatorland Posts: 4,450	Regency you ever get you car running right? __________________ exploder top end with 12 psi of v-tech

November 21st, 2007, 02:21 PM	#36
Mrbonesaw Regular Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Carson Ca Posts: 251	So what's up with this? You can't just leave us hanging. WTF was the end result?????? __________________ *316rwhp 333rwtq* STEEDA-UDP's CMRPDelete 90mmCAI 4.10's SCTLivewire Hurst Spydershaft 20"Razors Edelbrock Bassani-XPipew/Cats & Axlebacks Hurst Crew Member #4

Threads Similar to: Dyno Results?
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
My Dyno Results	WAVEBYE	The Clubhouse	46	October 25th, 2007 10:47 PM
Dyno results in!!	stanglifemike	2005+	35	September 20th, 2007 11:05 PM
Sniper New Tune...and Dyno Results...	02ponypackage	Electronics	29	September 11th, 2007 11:09 PM
Dyno Results 06 GT Supercharger With 20's	Pro Form	2005+	56	August 14th, 2007 06:26 AM
My DYNO results are in!!	Bossman	2005+	18	February 7th, 2007 08:34 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.