Dyno Results?

Wally1968 · July 14th, 2007, 05:00 PM

I finally got my 2006 convert gt with Roush S/C dyno'd. My best pull was 281 HP with 408 lb-ft. I though I would have more HP than this. Do these numbers sound right?

stanglifemike · July 14th, 2007, 06:08 PM

No that does not sound right at all

HMUSN · July 14th, 2007, 06:09 PM

Originally Posted by stanglifemike

No that does not sound right at all

+1

sounds more like a 100 shots numbers

06RedfireGT · July 14th, 2007, 08:19 PM

should be like 380/408.

orangeRcode · July 14th, 2007, 08:53 PM

Something is not right with those numbers. I would ask the tuner to check the calibration. Who installed the 'charger?

Wally1968 · July 14th, 2007, 10:00 PM

My local ford dealer installed the charger. The guy who did the dyno said that 281 HP at the rear wheels was really good. He said that what ever HP you have a at the engine, you will lose about 25%-30% to the rear wheels. So according to him he is not that far off.

mustangrebuilder · July 14th, 2007, 10:16 PM

maybe if your car was stock.....but not with a s/c

MustangMatt96GT · July 14th, 2007, 11:35 PM

With a blower you should be up there around 380 with the HP. DOesnt make sence to me! Make sure that you have a blower on that car!

Vabeachmustang · July 15th, 2007, 12:28 AM

Nope. Those numbers are not close...

06RedfireGT · July 15th, 2007, 12:35 AM

a stang with minimal bolt ons makes that kinda HP. are you sure you're not mistaking the 2 for a 3?

rugbyman00 · July 15th, 2007, 01:47 AM

wow i hope that isnt true, are you sure he didnt dyno the honda sitting next to yours? hahah j/k

stanglifemike · July 15th, 2007, 01:48 AM

I'm thinking that the 2 should have been a 3. Clerical error thats all

Luis_GT · July 15th, 2007, 02:05 AM

Originally Posted by rugbyman00

wow i hope that isnt true, are you sure he didnt dyno the honda sitting next to yours? hahah j/k

When did a honda get torque????

stanglifemike · July 15th, 2007, 03:00 AM

Yea, for real. A honda with 408 torque

Regency 2007 · July 15th, 2007, 03:00 AM

Yea, something is wrong with those numbers... and he told you 283rwhp for a supercharged motor is "really good" Find another dyno tuner.

05mustang_kb_charged · July 15th, 2007, 03:09 AM

i think that is 380 a stock gt will put down 272 rwhp. with that torque i would think you would have a minimum of 375 rwhp.
what boost you running? where did the torque and hp peak at on the graph?

flattusmaximus78 · July 15th, 2007, 10:57 AM

When my dads car had about all bolt ons minus long tubes... just in at vmp said it made 265 rwhp and then with his a/f adjustment he made 275 rwhp. I didn't beleive him cause after that it went 13.14 at 105 mph which idk think a 3500+ pound car could do with only 275 rwhp.

Make sure your using the right tuner. Who did thei install and who tuned it?

Stkjock · July 15th, 2007, 01:19 PM

those #'s are definitely wrong....

drive train loss is 12 - 18% (manual - auto) a S/C car... even a Roush @ 4psi with the canned tune should be above 350RWHP

GTNorm · July 15th, 2007, 03:49 PM

Hey Wally...it had to be a typo .I'm runnin the same as you and my dyno was 375hp/372 torque on a mustang dyno....I hear the numbers would be higher on the dynojet or whatever the other brand is. Did he give you a printout? Mybe the 281 was your cubic inches.

Wally1968 · July 15th, 2007, 08:03 PM

I will scan the graph and show you guy's.

July 14th, 2007, 05:00 PM	#1
Wally1968 Regular Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 92	Dyno Results? I finally got my 2006 convert gt with Roush S/C dyno'd. My best pull was 281 HP with 408 lb-ft. I though I would have more HP than this. Do these numbers sound right?

July 14th, 2007, 06:08 PM	#2
stanglifemike IBEATU 06 GT & 98 GT Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Douglasville, GA Posts: 4,277	No that does not sound right at all __________________ 98 GT: some stuff 06 GT: some more stuff Paxton/Vortech Crew Member #3 RadMustangs Store Injected Engineering

July 14th, 2007, 08:53 PM	#5
orangeRcode Hardcore Enthusiast 11.22@123 -150 shot Join Date: May 2006 Location: Mustang/Yukon, OK Posts: 1,806	Something is not right with those numbers. I would ask the tuner to check the calibration. Who installed the 'charger? __________________ http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/image-apic687.jpg

July 14th, 2007, 11:35 PM	#8
MustangMatt96GT All Throttle with a Bottle 1996 Mustang GT 10.76 @ 122 with d/a of 8365 ft Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Lakewood, CO Posts: 8,131	With a blower you should be up there around 380 with the HP. DOesnt make sence to me! Make sure that you have a blower on that car! __________________ 1996 Mustang GT with a 351 swap with Stalled C4 1997 F250 Powerstroke 1999 28' Classic Dominator Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions & Thanks for the help: PoorManMotorSports "Just Cause its Smoking, don't mean its broken"

July 15th, 2007, 12:28 AM	#9
Vabeachmustang Regular 2005 Mustang GT Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Virginia Beach, VA Posts: 490	Nope. Those numbers are not close... __________________ 2005 Mustang GT \| Procharger P-1SC-1 @12psi 501 rwhp, 445 torque Click here for my latest Dyno Pull MILITARY CREW HM1

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement

July 14th, 2007, 10:00 PM	#6
Wally1968 Regular Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 92	My local ford dealer installed the charger. The guy who did the dyno said that 281 HP at the rear wheels was really good. He said that what ever HP you have a at the engine, you will lose about 25%-30% to the rear wheels. So according to him he is not that far off.

July 14th, 2007, 10:16 PM	#7
mustangrebuilder Enthusiast Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 992	maybe if your car was stock.....but not with a s/c

July 15th, 2007, 01:47 AM	#11
rugbyman00 Regular Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: SA, Texas Posts: 198	wow i hope that isnt true, are you sure he didnt dyno the honda sitting next to yours? hahah j/k __________________ "Are you sure thats as big as it gets? I thought you said it was big?" 2007 GT K&N CAI, Hurst Short throw, who needs mufflers? hood scoop, hood, and spoiler painted flat black. Hurst Crew Member #12

July 15th, 2007, 01:48 AM	#12
stanglifemike IBEATU 06 GT & 98 GT Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Douglasville, GA Posts: 4,277	I'm thinking that the 2 should have been a 3. Clerical error thats all __________________ 98 GT: some stuff 06 GT: some more stuff Paxton/Vortech Crew Member #3 RadMustangs Store Injected Engineering

July 15th, 2007, 03:00 AM	#14
stanglifemike IBEATU 06 GT & 98 GT Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Douglasville, GA Posts: 4,277	Yea, for real. A honda with 408 torque __________________ 98 GT: some stuff 06 GT: some more stuff Paxton/Vortech Crew Member #3 RadMustangs Store Injected Engineering

July 15th, 2007, 03:00 AM	#15
Regency 2007 Hardcore Enthusiast F-150 FX4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: Memphrica Posts: 1,155	Yea, something is wrong with those numbers... and he told you 283rwhp for a supercharged motor is "really good" Find another dyno tuner.

July 15th, 2007, 03:09 AM	#16
05mustang_kb_charged Hardcore Enthusiast 2005 Mustang GT 10.32@137.70 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: LSU Country Posts: 2,439	i think that is 380 a stock gt will put down 272 rwhp. with that torque i would think you would have a minimum of 375 rwhp. what boost you running? where did the torque and hp peak at on the graph?

July 15th, 2007, 10:57 AM	#17
flattusmaximus78 MM Fanatic 1993 5.ohhhh 14.47 at 96 mph Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Gatorland Posts: 4,447	When my dads car had about all bolt ons minus long tubes... just in at vmp said it made 265 rwhp and then with his a/f adjustment he made 275 rwhp. I didn't beleive him cause after that it went 13.14 at 105 mph which idk think a 3500+ pound car could do with only 275 rwhp. Make sure your using the right tuner. Who did thei install and who tuned it? __________________ exploder top end with 12 psi of v-tech

July 15th, 2007, 01:19 PM	#18
Stkjock Regular 2006 Vert 11.867 @ 119.35 Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 438	those #'s are definitely wrong.... drive train loss is 12 - 18% (manual - auto) a S/C car... even a Roush @ 4psi with the canned tune should be above 350RWHP __________________ 06 GT- 4000lb Rowing machine 11.867 @ 119.35 1.799 - 60'

July 15th, 2007, 03:49 PM	#19
GTNorm Enthusiast Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 503	Hey Wally...it had to be a typo .I'm runnin the same as you and my dyno was 375hp/372 torque on a mustang dyno....I hear the numbers would be higher on the dynojet or whatever the other brand is. Did he give you a printout? Mybe the 281 was your cubic inches. __________________ A man with experience is never at the mercy of a man with a theory.

July 15th, 2007, 08:03 PM	#20
Wally1968 Regular Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 92	I will scan the graph and show you guy's.

Threads Similar to: Dyno Results?
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
My Dyno Results	WAVEBYE	The Clubhouse	46	October 25th, 2007 10:47 PM
Dyno results in!!	stanglifemike	2005+	35	September 20th, 2007 11:05 PM
Sniper New Tune...and Dyno Results...	02ponypackage	Electronics	29	September 11th, 2007 11:09 PM
Dyno Results 06 GT Supercharger With 20's	Pro Form	2005+	56	August 14th, 2007 06:26 AM
My DYNO results are in!!	Bossman	2005+	18	February 7th, 2007 08:34 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.