Paxton supercharger and running 10.79:1 ratio!?
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 4V / SVT

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old March 18th, 2009, 03:21 PM   #1
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Cobra Chris 98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Paxton supercharger and running 10.79:1 ratio!?


I am building my motor up in my 98 Cobra and I ordered a rotating assembly from SHM. They told me that with a paxton supercharger they would go with .020 oversized flat top pistons with a compression ratio of 10.79:1... Isn't that extremely high?? I thought for boost you want as low of a compression as possible. Can someone straighten this out for me?

Thanks,
Chris
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old March 18th, 2009, 03:53 PM   #2
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 397
bitemark46 has a spectacular aura aboutbitemark46 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

You can go higher in compression with a centrifical blower. However, 10.79 IMO on pump gas is too high. Maybe low boost levels and timing it'll live but once you start to crank up the boost cylinder temps increase and unless you are running high octane its gonna detonate. For a street strip car I'd go between 9:1 and stock 9.85:1. Any lower it'd be a dog on the low end. If you haven't bought it already I'd go somewhere else. If you have call and cancel the order.

-Mark
__________________

-Mark-
98' N/A Cobra (Stock longblock)
11.79 at 114.64 (1.62 60ft)
  Reply With Quote
Old March 18th, 2009, 05:00 PM   #3
mm's nitrous mod
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
SWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud of
iTrader: 8 reviews
Default

+1, i wouldnt push it more than 10:1. the reasoning for the able to put a little more compression is is because the way the boost pours on.
__________________


project warhorse under construction
wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning)

being built by MP2 Performance
  Reply With Quote
Old March 20th, 2009, 06:41 PM   #4
Regular
 
jumperjack's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 141
jumperjack is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

This may be helpful. I found this while looking online at stangtuning.

"What's better, low compression and more boost or high compression and less boost?"

There are certainly reasons to try to raise compression ratio, namely when off-boost performance matters, like on a street car, or when using a very small displacement motor. but when talking purely about on-boost power potential, compression just doesn't make any sense.

People have tested the power effects of raising compression for decades, and the most optimistic results are about 3% more power with an additional point of compression (going from 9:1 to 10:1, for example). All combinations will be limited by detonation at some boost and timing threshold, regardless of the fuel used. The decrease in compression allows you to run more boost, which introduces more oxygen into the cylinder. Raising the boost from 14psi to 15psi (just a 1psi increase) adds an additional 3.4% of oxygen. So right there, you are already past the break even mark of losing a point of compression. And obviously, lowering the compression a full point allows you to run much more than 1 additional psi of boost. In other words, you always pick up more power by adding boost and lowering compression, because power potential is based primarily on your ability to burn fuel, and that is directly proportional to the amount of oxygen that you have in the cylinder. Raising compression doesn't change the amount of oxygen/fuel in the cylinder, it just squeezes it a bit more.

So the big question becomes, how much boost do we gain for X amount of compression? The best method we have found is to calculate the effective compression ratio (ECR) with boost. The problem is that most people use an incorrect formula that says that 14.7psi of boost on a 8.5:1 motor is a 17:1 ECR. So how in the world do people get away with this combination on pump gas? You can't even idle down the street on pump gas on a true 17:1 compression motor. Here's the real formula to use:

sqrt((boost+14.7)/14.7) * CR = ECR

sqrt = square root
boost = psi of boost
CR = static compression ratio of the motor
ECR = effective compression ratio

So our above example gives an ECR of 12.0:1. This makes perfect sense, because 12:1 is considered to be the max safe limit with aluminum heads on pump gas, and 15psi is about as much boost as you can safely run before you at least start losing a significant amount of timing to knock. Of course every motor is different, and no formula is going to be perfect for all combinations, but this one is vastly better than the standard formula (which leaves out the square root).

So now we can target a certain ECR, say 12.0:1. We see that at 8.5:1 CR we can run 14.7psi of boost. But at 7.5:1 we can run 23psi of boost (and still maintain the 12.0:1 ECR). We only gave up 1 point of compression (3% max power) and yet we gained 28% more oxygen (28% more power potential). Suddenly it's quite obvious why top fuel is running 5:1 compression, that's where all the power is!!

8.5:1 turns out to be a real good all around number for on and off boost performance. Many "performance" NA motors are only 9.0:1 so we're not far off of that, and yet we're low enough to run 30+ psi without problems (provided that a proper fuel is used).
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Paxton supercharger and running 10.79:1 ratio!?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paxton sn 2000 supercharger?? jam77 General Tech 11 July 24th, 2010 09:31 PM
anybody running paxton or vortech w/o intercooler RainsFather 2005 - 2010 14 August 26th, 2008 12:14 AM
paxton supercharger mustangjl 99-04 1 March 16th, 2008 09:26 PM
PROCHARGER VS PAXTON SUPERCHARGER maverick_26 General Tech 97 October 15th, 2007 07:43 PM
Ordered my paxton supercharger!! jam77 General Tech 5 June 24th, 2007 11:03 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.