[CobraStang161]

Thanks

[mach1soldier]

Sick build man. You did a really nice job and you get to say you did it yourself which is awesome.

[na svt]

Originally Posted by CobraStang161 Actually Logan is $2800

The Logan is overpriced and the Sullivan will reduce midrange hp, make less tq and increase peak power only a little if any at all. It also kills preboost power/driveability. A stock intake is the perfect intake for a street driven turbo combo that doesn't see RPMs over 7k. Oh, and 4" runners, an automatic trans and turbo friendly rearend gears don't make for a fun street car.

You made a great choice by going with the stock intake.

[WhiteVenom]

^ so your saying its 2800 dollars of junk? They've dyno'd N/A 2v's with nothing buts cams/heads and picked up 40rwhp with the logan intake swap. Are you saying that its not best for a turbo application?

[majorownage]

Do not doubt the na svt

He is right though.

[na svt]

Originally Posted by WhiteVenom ^ so your saying its 2800 dollars of junk? They've dyno'd N/A 2v's with nothing buts cams/heads and picked up 40rwhp with the logan intake swap. Are you saying that its not best for a turbo application?

First, any intake will produce more hp than the PI intake so it's not that great of an accomplishment to make 40more hp with a 2800 dollar intake. Hmm, 40hp, 2800 dollars, that's $7 per 1hp increase...not exactly a bang for the buck mod. An edelbrock single plane intake will as much hp and it's only $400 (or less), that's 1hp for each dollar spent. I can show you where a ported NPI head, cammed 2v went from 270rwhp to just under 320rwhp by just adding an edelbrock intake.

Back to the 4v, the logan intake may make a little more peak power, but defintely not $2800 worth of it. People dismiss the stock intake to quickly but it turns out to be the better option in most cases. Once again, if the engine isn't turning more than 7k the length of the stock runners is hard to beat.