| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang SVT Cobra
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
dyno sheet
So reverified my tune at the dyno today after putting on cold air intake and definitely had a really nice gain. if you look at the numbers though throughout the rpm band on the air/fuel side of things, what I'm seein looks fairly normal except for where I suddenly let off the throttle at the end. One of the guys at the shop said I was runnin lean though, I'm not seein it, any thoughts?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
your tune looks like it needs a little afr adjustment in the lower rpm range, but looks ok. when you get out of the throttle, the ecu automatically goes lean till the desired rpm/load is met with amount of fuel being spray'd thru injector.
__________________
![]() project warhorse under construction wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning) being built by MP2 Performance |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang SVT Cobra
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm really wondering if I should richen it a little bit in the higher rpm range, like maybe 2% or so. I'm lookin at maintaining great performance while also maintaining longevity. On one hand I daily drive but I get a wild hair up my ass also atleast once a day. lookin at it, besides the quick decceleration where it spiked, looks like it would have maintained just below 12 but still above the red dotted line. My understanding is that this is optimal on a performance note but to be safe, I should really be running somewhere between 12.8 to 13.1. I guess this would cause around a 20 hp loss
Honestly, I'm really just tryin to decide if I should richen it a little |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
personally, i wouldnt bother it. mid 12's is about where i like my tunes.
__________________
![]() project warhorse under construction wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning) being built by MP2 Performance |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 141
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It looks as if you are running a little on the lean side. Do you have a wideband installed on the car? I personally wouldn't want anything more than 11.8 for A/F @WOT on a blown car.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 mustang
7.48x1.56=11.67
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,318
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Your fuel is fine where it's at for 93oct. As long as it stays right there. Thats about where I tuned my 110oct track tune. My methanol tune sits a tad richer.
__________________
New combo: Forged SC short Block,280cfm heads, Precision 6262 turbo, cx 31x12x3 fmic ![]() ![]() http://photobucket.com/JTsTurboBuild http://youtube.com/user/JTsStang |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: dyno sheet
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| post up dyno sheet of a kb 2.1L please | stal94gt | 99-04 | 233 | November 17th, 2010 09:58 PM |
| Here is the dyno sheet..WTF...HELP | 95project | 5.0 Mustangs | 68 | September 28th, 2009 04:30 PM |
| Procharger Dyno Sheet | Schraders | 99-04 | 44 | February 8th, 2008 08:01 PM |
| My dyno sheet. | J Mac0123 | 99-04 | 18 | September 17th, 2007 05:51 PM |
| Here's my new Dyno Sheet. | 04GTAMPA | General Tech | 75 | July 10th, 2007 04:05 PM |