![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing how much rwhp can the three 4vs handle? in the 4V / SVT Forum. so ive been wondering what each stock engine can handle... cobra (n/a), the mach ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
13.82 @ 101.09
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 660
|
how much rwhp can the three 4vs handle?thanks guys
__________________
![]() 2004 Gt Silver 5 speed next mod: termi |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang Mach 1
14.04@103.04
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Terre Haute, IN / St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,071
|
The Mach and Cobra (N/A) are around 400-450. You don't want to go more than that and the only way you are going to get over 450 is with boost or juice. I doubt that with full bolt ons and an aggressive cam with head work will put you over 450rwhp. As for Termis I've not actually heard of anyone saying what their breaking point is. If you plan on a high hp application your best bet would be buying a N/A Cobra, forging the engine, and then putting the boost on.
__________________
![]() 302rwhp 321tq |
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.W. Arkansas
Posts: 2,725
|
Like Mach Boy said. Stock for stock the termi motor holds the most hands down. But built they can all handle a hell of alot. I personaly like the Mach's better than the 99-01 cobras, so my goal is a built, cammed and sprayed Mach. If you wanna make a huge amount of power without having to build a motor then get a termi.
__________________
Project N/A 4V Under Way |
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: OKC,OK
Posts: 71
|
There stock 03-04 termi's holding 700-800 rwhp...and yes that is with all stock internals and stock heads...
__________________
03 Mineral Gray - DOB 6/28/02 #1062 of 8394 785rwhp/775rwtq - SAE//16Deg.,C16, 24.5psi, A/F11.0 Built and tunned by HPP Racing in Lewisville,Tx |
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: OKC,OK
Posts: 71
|
check out this thread..for what a bone stock termi motor can handle...
Seth's Twin Turbo STOCK 03 Cobra!!!! - SVTPerformance
__________________
03 Mineral Gray - DOB 6/28/02 #1062 of 8394 785rwhp/775rwtq - SAE//16Deg.,C16, 24.5psi, A/F11.0 Built and tunned by HPP Racing in Lewisville,Tx |
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
04 Whipple Cobra
Fuckin Fast
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 2,448
|
motor alone, no drivetrain considered, the mach, and 99/01 cobra motor's are safe to 400RWHP easy, you can go up to 450 relatively safe, and after that i would start expecting to buy a bottom end at any time.
03/04 cobra's with a twin screw a safe street tune to daily drive it would be 600-630RWHP after that you take a chance in a bad tank of gas. on a turbo car you could do 700RWHP on a DD without worrying too bad abot a bad tank. then for high octane, the motor will take almost anything you can throw at it. they will handle 30PSI on a twin screw making 800RWHP, or high boost on a turbo making 900RWHP. takes a really good tune, good gas and all though.
__________________
04 Torch Red Cobra #456 of 3768 born on 11/21/03 |
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,306
|
I seen the vid and I love it.
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: how much rwhp can the three 4vs handle?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| which will handle better? | Steve O | Suspension | 3 | October 4th, 2007 04:49 PM |
| Need to HANDLE HP | trueballerisme | V6 Mustangs | 64 | June 18th, 2007 10:51 PM |
| how much can the 3.8 actually handle? | 94v6blkndred | Poweradders | 2 | May 23rd, 2007 07:44 PM |
| Will the t-5 handle it? | 93'_GT | 5.0 Mustangs | 17 | May 11th, 2007 11:12 PM |
| can it handle it? | 9stang1 | 5.0 Mustangs | 10 | December 15th, 2006 04:52 PM |