![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Mods for extreme redline on teksid 4v? in the 4V / SVT Forum. I've been thinking about an extremely high revving NA build for my 97 Cobra ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 381
|
Mods for extreme redline on teksid 4v?As a major disclaimer I'm quite aware that there are MANY better ways to make power. I know this, and I know it will wear things out faster. I just want to learn more about this setup. I dont want to hear a million sarcastic replies about better methods to make power. Lets get technical. So basically I'm curious what all could be done to get a very high revving NA build. Ideas like..... Destroking less cam lift, custom grind aftermarket ignition and custom fuel maps light weight rotation assembly, pistons, rods etc. transmission built for the high revs oil system upgrades B heads with the best port/polish money can buy Full valve train work and lighter stronger valves Intake tuning, variable runner length similar to FR500? Timing/tune adjustment race fuel? Now answer me this..... Can we spin this thing past 10K? 13,500? 15,000? What kind of time between rebuilds if the driver is not an idiot and lets things warm up, with perfect maintenance? I expect it to be less.... but what kind of power and sadly, torque? How large can we make the power band? Its one of those "power over time" problems where I think its possible to apply more power over time with a large power band and almost zero interruption yet retain the extreme light weight of normal transmissions without the heavy dual clutch interruption free trannies. This would be fun for a completely gutted weekend road race car under 2400lbs like perhaps a kit car. I know I might be, but am I crazy? Does this sound like something attainable if every mod is for raising revs? I understand this would be very expensive. I just want the technical ideas thought about. Thanks for reading. |
|
|
#2 |
|
July 08 ROTM
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,674
|
It would certainly be exspensive, alot of custom one off parts, but the coolness factor would be off of the charts. I think that you should try to do this. I reccomend Modular Performance here is a link,
Ford Performance Parts, Mustang, Novi, MI
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 McCain/Palin '08 Arsenal0328 (10:32:19 PM): mso gives me a raging hard on |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Regular
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 381
|
The video of the wheelstand just rocks. It roars all the way past the camera on two wheels. Awesome work. I might give these guys a call. http://65.109.173.141/catapano_wheel_stand.mpg |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
July 08 ROTM
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,674
|
Where you located?
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 McCain/Palin '08 Arsenal0328 (10:32:19 PM): mso gives me a raging hard on |
|
|
#5 |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.W. Arkansas
Posts: 2,959
|
I don't think you will be able to turn it past 10k or realy want to. you are way out of useable torque even at 9k so having a v8 would be pointless if you wanna turn that. I don't think you could find a spring setup to keep the valves from floating and having severe valve rotation and valve to seat "bounce"
|
|
|
#6 |
|
July 08 ROTM
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,674
|
He'll have to get custom order from Ja.. Pan
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 McCain/Palin '08 Arsenal0328 (10:32:19 PM): mso gives me a raging hard on |
|
|
#7 |
|
I Touch Myself Sometimes
91 Sonic Blue Goodness
19.83 @ 12mph
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 26,770
|
there is a difference between a bike and a car man..
__________________
![]() MILITARY CREW FOUNDER SCT Custom Tuning, JLT intakes, Aeroforce Interceptor OBDII gauges and PLX widebandsemail joe@tricktuners.com |
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 381
|
Any technical reason? There is always a weakest link, what is it? How much farther would the best of breed replacement allow it to go? I was hoping for a technical conversation here....
How far can we make it go then if 10K is out of the question. This isnt supposed to be a motor cycle, but rather a different approach to a very specific problem to test the limits. You're telling me with specific parts, a custom build, tune, and planning that this teksid block cannot spin faster? If your only reason is because it wont last a year and might need replacement then please specify. I'm expecting wear to be an issue. This being a specialized experiment I'm going into this knowing that things will need more attention and replacement. Planning the length between rebuilds is surely in order here and I'm just asking for some comments on the matter. I want to modify/build a car and be able to work on it with performance similar to high end sports cars. Have you ever looked at how expensive any repair/modification on a 911 Turbo is? I just dont care to spend that kind of money to be so abstracted from choice. I want to build up a modular because I know it can be almost as smooth and rev just as high if not higher for almost nothing compared to 100+K sports cars. The traditional route would be more like a single turbo, built IRS, and extreme weight reduction but I want to try a different path. I want to try a Watts link Griggs setup, in an ultra light car, with a high NA redline and perhaps a Motec unit for managing everything plus traction control. Handling and sustained acceleration being the key points. The low torque can be fixed with rear end gears and a custom ratio trans to boost the low points on the dyno graph for expected turn speeds, and tuning the intake runners cross over point. Remember this is for light street, heavy track use. I dont care about 0-60 as much. Somehow I knew I'd get a thread full of sarcastic one liners. Do we speak tech around here? It probably is a bit out there for sure, but hell I want to talk about it and establish some expectations. It just sounds like a fun problem to attack and I'm not 100% going to build this. Feasible? |
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
03 mach 1
13.2@109
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mooretownship,PA kinda close to allentown
Posts: 2,414
|
even 10K is alot to ask out of one of these motors. its the same basic principal of why a motor runs out of avaiable horsepower its able to get, there are just limits to what some motors can do.
i do beleive its possible to make it rev up to 10K or slightly higher. you will have to get almost every single part completely custom made. as i dont know what would limit the mtor to reving up this high, doc is def on the right track with the valves thu. def should try it thu, all in all its gonna be alot of money but itd be neat, my friends 355 in his IROC rev'd up to a little over 10K and that was pretty neat, then again it had 40+ grand into the motor. |
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 381
|
so with this custom build what kind of power do you think is attainable?
I'd be delighted with 350rwhp which might be a stretch to achieve. I've heard normal NA 4v builds to top off around 325-425rwhp range. Would 325rwhp out of this less aggressive build be reachable? I could settle for that only with this heavy weight reduction. 305 in a 2800lb car feels like significantly more, I can imagine a smooth 325rwhp in an even lighter car to still be a fun time... Perhaps just a dual clutch sequential transmission and a single small turbo to make up for the weight would be more in order. That would still solve the power interruption problem. Somehow i was expecting 10K+ to be reachable with all those mods. Sad. |
|
|
#11 |
|
MM's Mad Scientist
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,048
|
10K would be a stiff order for the motor. The Teksid block would be garbage soon after the first couple of runs, and I don't know of a transmission made that would shift at that RPM (manual) or keep clutches (automatic). 350 RWHP with a 4v would be a cakewalk. I would imagine the stock bottom end could be used and reach that goal.
__________________
|
|
|
#12 |
|
July 08 ROTM
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,674
|
IMHO Full boltons, ported intake, stage 1 N/A cams and some minor headwork. Should net you around your goal.
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 McCain/Palin '08 Arsenal0328 (10:32:19 PM): mso gives me a raging hard on |
|
|
#13 |
|
July 08 ROTM
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,674
|
Acidtonic, where in MI are you located? I'm from MI.
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 McCain/Palin '08 Arsenal0328 (10:32:19 PM): mso gives me a raging hard on |
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 381
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
July 08 ROTM
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,674
|
I grew up in Romeo, I know RO real well. Like 35mi and Van Dyke
__________________
![]() MM MACH 1 CREW MEMBER #2 McCain/Palin '08 Arsenal0328 (10:32:19 PM): mso gives me a raging hard on |
|
|
#16 |
|
Newbie
2004 Mustang Mach I
12.11@115.74
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 43
|
BOSS 302 Iron Block 5.0 Liter handle up to 900 hp. Manley Forged Pistons, 4340 Manley
Forged H-Beam Rods w/ARP bolts, forged crankshaft fully balanced and blueprinted Cobra heads , ARP head studs, Felpro head gaskets, and a High Volume oil pump. The list get longer if you're serious. |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Secret In The Works
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Relocated Back To Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,990
|
Alot of money spent, in the right places could make it happen. Also alot of money.... Did i say alot of money? Yeah, alot of money to spin an engine up to 10k. Alot of money.
__________________
Definition of Fast? ![]() I'd say thats good enough. ![]() NMRA Outlaw 10.5 Season Opener 2008 Photo courtesy of - Yours Truly |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Secret In The Works
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Relocated Back To Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,990
|
Oh, and FYI. Al Pappito spins his N/A 5.4 4v up to 9,000rpm.
A guy that used to work for VT Engines, before all the BS happened, had an N/A 4.6 4v that he spun past 8500rpm, and still drove the car on the street. Car ran low 10s.
__________________
Definition of Fast? ![]() I'd say thats good enough. ![]() NMRA Outlaw 10.5 Season Opener 2008 Photo courtesy of - Yours Truly |
|
|
#19 | |
|
AssHole Admin
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 9,112
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,423
|
off mmr's website:
NEW 5.0 BOSS CAST IRON BLOCK This Brand new block cast at the Cleveland plant gives you a healty .4 liters more than a factory block while still using the factory stroke crank shaft! Add a MMR Stroker crank and you have up to 324 Cubic Inches/5.3 liters of Modular Muscle! ALL 96-2008 2V, 3V and 4V heads bolt right on!
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze 1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69 ![]() Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: 1. Jesus Christ 2. The American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Mods for extreme redline on teksid 4v?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Teksid Build | HMStang217 | 99-04 | 14 | August 19th, 2008 08:07 PM |
| Almost had a Teksid!!! | man_of_war2081 | 99-04 | 5 | June 23rd, 2008 12:22 PM |
| thinking about a teksid build | slapwig | Modular Mustangs | 0 | April 24th, 2008 09:01 PM |
| Teksid Main cap tq specs | HMStang217 | 99-04 | 0 | January 20th, 2008 06:22 PM |
| NA teksid 2v Build | HMStang217 | 99-04 | 11 | January 18th, 2008 09:06 PM |