|
|
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Blogs | Garage | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Insurance |
| | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
February 10th, 2009, 06:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 20
 iTrader: 0 reviews
|
89 5.0 rear ride height
i noticed that my 5.0 sits a little lower than other 5.0.but some 89s i have seen look the same is there any differance in ride height in certain years and whats the correct height thanx
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
February 10th, 2009, 08:55 PM
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
85 GT/86 SVO/2010 GT500
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rossville IN
Posts: 1,183
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
factory will look like it's 4 wheel drive
|
|
|
|
February 10th, 2009, 10:11 PM
|
#3 |
|
No bucks, no Buck Rogers
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Braunfels, Tex / Seguin, Tex
Posts: 4,849
 iTrader: 0 reviews
 |
My red car (89 5.0) had shorter springs in it.. when I did the 2.3 -> 5.0 swap, I moved everything (all suspension parts) into the 2.3 car.. so it sits exactly as the 89 5.0 did. Not sure what brand/size springs are in it now, but the springs I put in were definitely shorter (and heavier) than the ones that came OUT of this car.
Here is a pic.. 
__________________
'87 2.3 Notch with +4 cylinder mod  MM's Resident Aggie Black Stang Crew Member #11 |
|
|
|
February 11th, 2009, 03:47 AM
|
#4 |
|
Atomized
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,368
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
That's not stock lol
|
|
|
|
February 11th, 2009, 08:10 AM
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
85 GT/86 SVO/2010 GT500
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rossville IN
Posts: 1,183
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It looks way to to be stock
|
|
|
|
February 11th, 2009, 04:29 PM
|
#6 |
|
No bucks, no Buck Rogers
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Braunfels, Tex / Seguin, Tex
Posts: 4,849
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
No its not stock... like I said, the springs that are in it are shorter than the stock ones...
__________________
'87 2.3 Notch with +4 cylinder mod MM's Resident Aggie Black Stang Crew Member #11 |
|
|
|
February 11th, 2009, 05:01 PM
|
#7 |
|
Regular
1993 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Big, Texas
Posts: 229
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Lakewood lift bars,competition engineering 50/50 shocks out back
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m...27-08_1003.jpg http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m...27-08_0952.jpg http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m...27-08_0951.jpg |
|
|
|
February 12th, 2009, 03:28 AM
|
#8 |
|
No bucks, no Buck Rogers
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Braunfels, Tex / Seguin, Tex
Posts: 4,849
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Nice!
__________________
'87 2.3 Notch with +4 cylinder mod MM's Resident Aggie Black Stang Crew Member #11 |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 89 5.0 rear ride height
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ride height | graystang01 | The Clubhouse | 18 | January 17th, 2009 03:52 PM |
| adjustable ride height? | 03StangGT | 99-04 | 17 | August 17th, 2008 01:10 AM |
| Ride height requirements. | wrksnfx | Multimedia | 3 | May 6th, 2008 11:09 PM |
| Looking for ride Height | Hawaiianbro | 99-04 | 30 | February 14th, 2008 06:23 PM |
| what is stock ride height for 98 GT? | markush | General Tech | 1 | April 13th, 2007 03:00 AM |
