| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 27
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
power steering or NOT!!
I've been going back and fourth about taking my power steering out...It's a street/strip car mostly a weekend cruiser to shows and meets...Pump leaks a bit and so does the rack and I don't know if i should put out the money to replace both or just get a manual rack. Anybody have any regrets about taking their power steering out? Does a manual rack make it a lot easier or could I just plug the stock rack and call it a day?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
1982 GT t-top
no proof of purchase
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N.E.PA
Posts: 717
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I don't regret getting rid of my power steering at all ...and technically you can plug your lines and leave fluid in the rack but I wouldn't recommend it
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ya I have somewhat wondered this my self, it seems like it would be a pain the ass to drive the car around for daily use thought
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
if its non dd and its leaking already i'd ditch it
__________________
"Whip out your dick you'll either get it sucked or get smacked..." "That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..." |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
1989 Mustang GT 5.0L H.O.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Crossville, TN. U.S.A.
Posts: 183
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I've owned cars in the past that didn't have power steering. The only issue was turning the steering wheel when you're parked. When your moving it's not that big of a deal. Of course you have to remember that "Back in the Day" when a car didn't have power steering it had a HUGE steering wheel to give you the leverage you'd need to turn the wheels. Power racks are cheaper then a manual one but then with a manual one you don't need a pump and you don't waste the few HP it takes to run it either. It's pretty much up to you.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Make the swap. Manual racks are great. You get more of a "feel" for the steering.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,077
![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
Yeah the valve in my pump went missing, therefore the pump didn't work... Id go manual rack, because the car was just horrible to drive.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed ![]() --Moates Quarter horse $225-- --Cobra intake $150-- --tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
12.8@103... stock motor
11.8@113...150 shot
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 464
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
if you disconnect the lines into the rack, and drain all the fluid out, it will feel similar to a manual rack.
of course you would also need to remove the pump or at least get a shorter belt to bypass the pulley. this is how my car is, but i have a flaming river rack sitting pretty in my room, so i won't be able to tell you how it holds up over time. as soon as suspension parts make their way to my door, flaming river is going on. no need to pay for an alignment twice. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
1982 GT t-top
no proof of purchase
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N.E.PA
Posts: 717
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
mine was a dd with manual steering the only time it was even relatively hard to turn was when parking or going really slow once your moving its easy
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,387
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
go manual man i've dd'd a fox with a flaming river kit for the last three years and i don't regret it at all.. really cleans the engine bay up too and you shed like 32lbs at the same time. no more leaks or lines to worry about.
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,596
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i have had power steering in my mustang i have had a power steering rack with no pump and now i have a flaming river (standard ratio) rack the power steering leaked it was annoyingly loud,looked ugly,but nice to turn when parked. i noticed that there was alot of slop and i couldnt keep it stright on the track. the power steering rack with no pump is just plain horrible its so hard to turn driving and almost impossible parked.and the slop got worse. manual rack is great its not too bad parked but as soon as you start moving even the slightest bit you can steer as easy as power steering. you feel like you have more control of the car i havent brought it to the strip yet but i have a feeling it will go perfectly stright.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 27
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thanks for all the Info guys, last question i have is what the ratios mean when buying a manual rack. Like they say that a 20:1 ratio flaming river rack is a standard?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
1989 Mustang GT 5.0L H.O.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Crossville, TN. U.S.A.
Posts: 183
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It's pretty much the same as rear end ratios. The higher the number the easier it should be to turn but I think it also makes it more turns lock to lock IIRC. I'm sure someone will chime in with more/better info.
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,596
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
there is a standard and a quick ratio. standard is what you want. i believe quick ratio would be for road racing.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
1989 Mustang GT 5.0L H.O.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Crossville, TN. U.S.A.
Posts: 183
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Also, front tires will make a bit of a difference too. If you're running skinny tires aka the "Drag Race Look" then manual won't be too bad but if you're running a wide tire aka the "Trans Am Look" then it'll be harder to turn at no or low speed. I'm really kickin' around the idea of getting a manual rack. My power steering lines are lose and leakin and besides getting rid of a bit of weight it'll make the car simpler and simple is best, it's one less thing to work on or worry about.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,387
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You want the standard ratio manual rack and if your power steering junk is already leaking an making noises which means it's on its way out just go with the manual setup. If you don't like it you can prob resell it for most of what you put into it if need be
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned
12.8@103... stock motor
11.8@113...150 shot
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 464
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
driving a p/s rack with fluid/lines hooked up, it sucks. if you disconnect the high pressure lines from the rack, it's not that bad at all. is there really that big of a difference besides the ratio giving you more "leverage"??
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
I've done that in the past when I was a cheap ass and it is nothing like a manual rack. My brother in laws car still has a power rack with no powersteering. It sucks to drive like that.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang GT
SLOWER THAN OLD PEOPLE FUCK..:-(
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 2,079
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
+1 id had my 94 super coupe set up like that, it was the biggest pain in the ass ever.
__________________
![]() 1995 Mustang GT..4.30's,BBK Longtubes, Off Road X-Pipe,Magnaflow Catback,BBK Intake,BBK Underdrive Pulleys Walbro 255lph pump,accel dizzy,MSD Coil,MSD 8.5 Super Conductors,front sway bar removed, more coming soon. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: power steering or NOT!!
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| power steering | tarpeeler | 2005 - 2010 | 4 | September 26th, 2008 04:02 PM |
| power steering | ThE GhOsT RiDer | 5.0 Mustangs | 8 | May 28th, 2008 01:55 AM |
| power steering | skid6 | 5.0 Mustangs | 6 | August 11th, 2007 07:11 AM |
| Decreasing power steering pump pressure for tighter steering | 83 5.0 | 5.0 Mustangs | 6 | January 7th, 2007 09:24 PM |
| Power Steering?? | RedHott66 | V6 Mustangs | 2 | December 22nd, 2006 07:17 PM |