| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 |
|
Banned
1988 LX Procharged 347
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Anytown, USA
Posts: 149
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i have close to $4500 in my injection system
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [FONT="Arial Black"][SIZE="4"][COLOR="Red"]Procharged 347 stroker [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#62 |
|
Newbie
1997 F150 Lariat
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 4
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Carb / EFI - or in the middle?
Hi Reverend,
Here is an example somewhere in the middle. My Pa-in-law had a 73 Maverick. He bought a 90 HO 5.0 roller motor off Craigslist - all the EFI/harness/computer. His Mav did not have the in tank High pressure pump - the existing fuel line setup would need to be replaced to support a high pressure system and return line. He weighed the options, then ended up converting the roller motor to carb - he had an existing early 302 timing cover which included the fuel pump. And also swapped to the early waterpump etc. Pa was also swayed by the old Carcraft article on the 400 horse junkyard 302 - where they took a 90 5.0 and pulled the EFI off it and swapped on a weiand intake and a holley carb and got MORE horsepower than the factory EFI on the same shortblock! It could be argued that if a guy swapped injectors and did some other tuning work the EFI system could have bested the carb setup - but my point is - at what cost? I agree if you have a full existing operational EFI - it is likely better to stick with it - and mod away. If you do not - it is most likely a lot cheaper to go carb.
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Newbie
1997 F150 Lariat
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 4
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I really appreciate that this thread picked up nicely!!
Reverend - I agree with you - any turbo/blown/nitrous system should be EFI - whether Megasquirt or other. But it is spendy. My entire original point was about bang for the buck. For a few hundred bucks you can have a low maintenance butt kicking Normally Aspirated Mustang or Ford.
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Carbureted cars run awesome when they are tuned properly. No question there. Buying a $100 craigslist intake and a Holley avenger carb aren't always practical. If I were to put an Edelbrock Performer intake from craigslist and a Holley avenger carb on my black notch back it would have went from a 9.30 car to an 11.0 car. But on some cars it might work ok. As far as the pump being on all the time, the factory electric pumps shut off when the engine shuts off when the engine stops running just like a mechanical pump. The inertia switch has nothing to do with it, that is just for impact protection. Not always.....
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Carb VS fuel injection
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fuel injection to carb | odie22 | 5.0 Mustangs | 19 | December 11th, 2008 03:32 PM |
| 79 2.3T To 2.3t fuel injection | beheivjer | 2.3 Mustangs | 2 | May 13th, 2008 02:22 PM |
| Fuel Injection to Carb | shawn91stang | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | February 3rd, 2007 12:40 PM |
| How to change Fuel injection to carb | OTreborO | 5.0 Mustangs | 2 | July 27th, 2006 12:49 PM |