| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 157
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
High compression or Low?
Whats are the pros and cons of each?? Is low compression with boost actually "better" but just more money?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
better. if you have too high of compression and boost your looking at blowing your motor.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1988 Notchback
11.19 @ 122mph N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DeRidder, Louisiana
Posts: 424
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
well, alot of boost with high compression will build up to much cylinder pressure and cause the head gaskets to fail hopefully before anything bad happens. Low compression engines cost no more than high compression engines. Power adders can be had fairly cheap these days as well. They are for sale used all over the internet at crazy cheap prices. There a guy on the corral selling a cartech twin turbo kit for 3700 or 3800 I think. That's a hell of a deal for a power adder kit that will support over 1000rwhp. High compression with boost often runs into detonation issues also, must run hot gas in high compression engines. Even an engine with 9.8:1 compression will detonate under 15psi of boost with a 60mm single turbo. That's where you tune will come into play by retarding timing and adding fuel at the right time and the right amount of both.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
In a naturally aspirated engine low compression just lessens the efficiency of the engine. Higher compression is generally more efficient and creates more cylinder pressure which makes more horsepower.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 157
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ok so generally a high compression motor ( no boost ) is better then a low compression ( with boost )?
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,304
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
wellll that comes with with many vairables. yes and no.
__________________
![]() I believe in art when it is not seen. I believe in music when it is not audible. I believe in God when He is silent. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
1988 GT
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 852
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
So, does Nitrous have the same effect as say a turbo or blower on a higher compression motor? For instance.... 10.5:1 comp. motor with 125 wet kit has the same odds as blowing a head gasket, piston ring etc, as a turbo or blower set-up @ 8-10PSI? Assumeing all combo's are tuned?
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MM Fanatic
1990 LX hatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,392
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
no, nitrous is fine for high to low compression. Heat and detonation are the general worries of n2o. Id say your odds are less likely with the n2o
__________________
![]() Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
It's all in your timing and fuel trim..
People boost 10:1/10.5:1 compression engines (not really HIGH compression, but higher than most turbo setups would like) all the time. The problem is detonation, so in counter to fix this, the fuel is increased so the cyl walls do not go lean and create a lot of heat, and timing is pulled also in effort to prevent detonation. But there is a point to where a motor will have so little timing in it, that it wont run like it should. Running as much timing as possible with race gas is the best way to do it, but that's impractical lol
__________________
weeee foooord!
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Enthusiast
1988 GT
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 852
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yeah it's a 10.5:1 motor, Just wondering for future reference I guess. I might be able to afford a kit and wasn't sure if I should pick it up or not. But now I know, thanks.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: High compression or Low?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low compression | vortech4.6l | 96-98 | 0 | October 4th, 2008 12:54 PM |
| Low Compression Pistons(10.1)... | teal89 | 5.0 Mustangs | 22 | March 10th, 2008 09:15 PM |
| Low Compression High Boost? | e3sean | 5.0 Mustangs | 19 | November 19th, 2007 02:13 PM |
| High vs. Low Compression | 87StangLX | General Tech | 14 | November 17th, 2007 11:42 PM |
| Low compression and low Octane? | brad65 | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | July 28th, 2006 05:53 PM |