351w swap
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old May 7th, 2009, 04:36 PM   #1
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
Lazor05 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

351w swap


I'm looking at doing a 351 swap into my 82 GT. What years would be the best for me to look for for the 351? I found an 86 out of a bronco for $400 without the carb and intake. I know I have to replace the oil pan, headers probably mounts etc. But I also found a roller block for $450 with the stock pistons crank and other parts. I was just wondering if someone could give me some advice on what block to use, I haven't had any luck finding info. thanks
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old May 7th, 2009, 04:46 PM   #2
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,778
superbean will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to superbean
Default

Ideally the older the block, the stronger, but that's not always true.

Try to stay away from smogger blocks unless you plan on rebuilding them..

I would go with the newer roller motor
__________________
weeee foooord!

  Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2009, 05:57 PM   #3
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
86er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 7,626
86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of86er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 86er Send a message via Yahoo to 86er
Default

ideal is 69-74, they have the thickest main webbings. You can buy comps roller conversion piece for like 50 bucks or set of retro lifters for 500 bucks.

Dont buy a roller block just because its a roller, plenty of ways around that.

Man i keep seeing people paying all this money for them, I have like 6 I paid 68 dollars for at the local pull a part
__________________
Just a truck
5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock

The "search" button, its not just for porn

piecing together the next project


faster than your first sexual experience
  Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2009, 09:39 PM   #4
Regular
 
1993 mustang hatch back
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sumter, Sc
Posts: 98
sctravis77 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to sctravis77
Default

You can use the dual sump oil pan and pick up from a older crown vic instead of buying $150 ford racing one. I put mine in this week and fit awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2009, 10:41 PM   #5
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Iwannagofast's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang GT
havent gone since gears
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,940
Iwannagofast will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to Iwannagofast
Default

Originally Posted by 86er View Post
ideal is 69-74, they have the thickest main webbings. You can buy comps roller conversion piece for like 50 bucks or set of retro lifters for 500 bucks.

Dont buy a roller block just because its a roller, plenty of ways around that.

Man i keep seeing people paying all this money for them, I have like 6 I paid 68 dollars for at the local pull a part
ok this conversion your tlkin about is the spider piece right....can any block be converted with just using that piece
__________________
1990 GT
Pro 5.0, 3.73s, TFS Intake, Flows
--------
2004 Impala SS
Supercharged(stock), DD
--------
2001 Tacoma
2.5" Lift, K&N cai, TB Spacer, Magnaflow, Elec. Fan, Stereo MODS!!
Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
my table spoon engine is bigger than the tea spoon engine!
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2009, 12:01 AM   #6
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
Lazor05 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 86er View Post
ideal is 69-74, they have the thickest main webbings. You can buy comps roller conversion piece for like 50 bucks or set of retro lifters for 500 bucks.

Dont buy a roller block just because its a roller, plenty of ways around that.

Man i keep seeing people paying all this money for them, I have like 6 I paid 68 dollars for at the local pull a part
Dang maybe I should be patient and keep looking then. Thanks for the advice so far guys. I'm trying to do a budget build for this. Its just going to be a DD that will see the track a few times but not much. I know with the 302 gt40's are a popular budget head but would these be too restrictive for a 351? and what intake would you recommend, and cam. haha could you maybe just give me a few ideas of builds. This will be my first build. I would like to keep the power down low. Also is the 351 a really torque motor? And in case your wondering im talking about the 351w, guess I never specified
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 01:36 PM   #7
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Iwannagofast's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang GT
havent gone since gears
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,940
Iwannagofast will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to Iwannagofast
Default

im bumping this to get an answer to my question above
__________________
1990 GT
Pro 5.0, 3.73s, TFS Intake, Flows
--------
2004 Impala SS
Supercharged(stock), DD
--------
2001 Tacoma
2.5" Lift, K&N cai, TB Spacer, Magnaflow, Elec. Fan, Stereo MODS!!
Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
my table spoon engine is bigger than the tea spoon engine!
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 01:55 PM   #8
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

gt40ps are to restrictive for a 302, let alonea 351.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 02:16 PM   #9
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Lazor05 View Post
I'm looking at doing a 351 swap into my 82 GT. What years would be the best for me to look for for the 351? I found an 86 out of a bronco for $400 without the carb and intake. I know I have to replace the oil pan, headers probably mounts etc. But I also found a roller block for $450 with the stock pistons crank and other parts. I was just wondering if someone could give me some advice on what block to use, I haven't had any luck finding info. thanks
It depends on what your goals are. More than likely any 351W block will work. If you want to use a hydraulic roller cam and the factory style roller lifters than get the roller block.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 02:17 PM   #10
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Iwannagofast View Post
ok this conversion your tlkin about is the spider piece right....can any block be converted with just using that piece
Doing a "roller conversion" on a non roller block is stupid. Do it right and get the link bar lifters.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 02:23 PM   #11
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Iwannagofast's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang GT
havent gone since gears
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,940
Iwannagofast will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to Iwannagofast
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Doing a "roller conversion" on a non roller block is stupid. Do it right and get the link bar lifters.

o ok....so any 351w can be made roller by using the retro fit lifters....ill probly do solid roller when i build my 408....unless thats not a good idea.....

i have just heard so many different answers to questions about converting to roller and haveing to use a special cam or bot being able to go roller if it wasnt a roller to begin with....im just need one good straight answer
__________________
1990 GT
Pro 5.0, 3.73s, TFS Intake, Flows
--------
2004 Impala SS
Supercharged(stock), DD
--------
2001 Tacoma
2.5" Lift, K&N cai, TB Spacer, Magnaflow, Elec. Fan, Stereo MODS!!
Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
my table spoon engine is bigger than the tea spoon engine!
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 03:33 PM   #12
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Iwannagofast View Post
o ok....so any 351w can be made roller by using the retro fit lifters....ill probly do solid roller when i build my 408....unless thats not a good idea.....

i have just heard so many different answers to questions about converting to roller and haveing to use a special cam or bot being able to go roller if it wasnt a roller to begin with....im just need one good straight answer
There is nothing to convert. People have been running roller cams long before the factory started putting them engines. The problem is when you try to use factory roller lifters in a non roller block. People think you can just throw any old cam in a non factory roller block with factory roller lifters. You can't, you have to use a small base circle cam or the lifters will be pushed to high in the lifter bores which will affect oiling to the lifters and the top end of the engine. In addition to that, small base circle cams are junk. They are weaker, flex more, transmit more harmonics, stability issues, etc. People like to save money and spend $100 and use some junk used factory roller lifters, spider and dog bones on a non roller block instead of spending $400 on a set of link bar hydraulic roller lifters. I can't see why someone would spend a ton of money on an engine and then pinch pennies on the camshaft and valvetrain which is will make or break your power figures. A shit valve train is going to severely limit your rpm and horsepower potential. The solution to this problem is to run whatever cam you want and hydraulic link bar roller lifters which have been around since they started slicing bread. Another option is to run a solid roller cam.....which is the best option.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 05:28 PM   #13
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Iwannagofast's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang GT
havent gone since gears
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,940
Iwannagofast will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to Iwannagofast
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
There is nothing to convert. People have been running roller cams long before the factory started putting them engines. The problem is when you try to use factory roller lifters in a non roller block. People think you can just throw any old cam in a non factory roller block with factory roller lifters. You can't, you have to use a small base circle cam or the lifters will be pushed to high in the lifter bores which will affect oiling to the lifters and the top end of the engine. In addition to that, small base circle cams are junk. They are weaker, flex more, transmit more harmonics, stability issues, etc. People like to save money and spend $100 and use some junk used factory roller lifters, spider and dog bones on a non roller block instead of spending $400 on a set of link bar hydraulic roller lifters. I can't see why someone would spend a ton of money on an engine and then pinch pennies on the camshaft and valvetrain which is will make or break your power figures. A shit valve train is going to severely limit your rpm and horsepower potential. The solution to this problem is to run whatever cam you want and hydraulic link bar roller lifters which have been around since they started slicing bread. Another option is to run a solid roller cam.....which is the best option.
thank you for finally straightening that out for me....that really explains a lot....yes thats what im gonna do is get the link bar lifters then....no u were saying to use hydraulic roller lifter but then you said that solid is the best....what is the difference between the two...wat are some pros and cons of each and does it affect drive ability because mine will be more of a street strip car
__________________
1990 GT
Pro 5.0, 3.73s, TFS Intake, Flows
--------
2004 Impala SS
Supercharged(stock), DD
--------
2001 Tacoma
2.5" Lift, K&N cai, TB Spacer, Magnaflow, Elec. Fan, Stereo MODS!!
Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
my table spoon engine is bigger than the tea spoon engine!
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 06:35 PM   #14
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Iwannagofast View Post
thank you for finally straightening that out for me....that really explains a lot....yes thats what im gonna do is get the link bar lifters then....no u were saying to use hydraulic roller lifter but then you said that solid is the best....what is the difference between the two...wat are some pros and cons of each and does it affect drive ability because mine will be more of a street strip car
Hydraulic you can just throw in and never touch again. They are hydraulicly adjusted so to speak with engine oil. Limited camshaft profiles.

Solid requires some maintenance from time to time in the form of adjusting valves. Not nearly as often as people will try to make you think. The people that say you have to "adjust valve lash all the time" have never owned a solid cam. Camshaft profiles can be more radial with a solid lifter and rpm and horsepower potential is greater as well. Valvetrain stability is better with a solid cam.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 06:42 PM   #15
Regular
 
laztug's Avatar
 
1993 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Big, Texas
Posts: 229
laztug is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

How good are stock prorted 351w heads?
__________________

Stock 5.0 Motor M/T Drag Radials
E.T.- 13.859
MPH-97.23
60 foot-1.853
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2009, 06:47 PM   #16
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by laztug View Post
How good are stock prorted 351w heads?
Not worth a damn. Most likely won't flow for shit because anybody that is good at porting won't waste the time on a set of stock 351W heads.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: 351w swap
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
351w swap into 00 v6 got poney V6 Mustangs 13 March 15th, 2011 04:58 PM
351w Swap shadowgames81 5.0 Mustangs 3 March 23rd, 2009 06:43 PM
351w swap guys, need your help! built351w 5.0 Mustangs 11 June 17th, 2008 02:19 PM
'93 LX Notchback needs a 351W swap Velvet Leopard 2.3 Mustangs 1 December 29th, 2006 03:15 PM
1993 2.3L to 351W swap Velvet Leopard 5.0 Mustangs 0 December 19th, 2006 05:07 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.