| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
351w swap
I'm looking at doing a 351 swap into my 82 GT. What years would be the best for me to look for for the 351? I found an 86 out of a bronco for $400 without the carb and intake. I know I have to replace the oil pan, headers probably mounts etc. But I also found a roller block for $450 with the stock pistons crank and other parts. I was just wondering if someone could give me some advice on what block to use, I haven't had any luck finding info. thanks
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Ideally the older the block, the stronger, but that's not always true.
Try to stay away from smogger blocks unless you plan on rebuilding them.. I would go with the newer roller motor
__________________
weeee foooord!
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
ideal is 69-74, they have the thickest main webbings. You can buy comps roller conversion piece for like 50 bucks or set of retro lifters for 500 bucks.
Dont buy a roller block just because its a roller, plenty of ways around that. Man i keep seeing people paying all this money for them, I have like 6 I paid 68 dollars for at the local pull a part
__________________
Just a truck 5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock The "search" button, its not just for porn piecing together the next project faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
|
You can use the dual sump oil pan and pick up from a older crown vic instead of buying $150 ford racing one. I put mine in this week and fit awesome.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 110
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
im bumping this to get an answer to my question above
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
gt40ps are to restrictive for a 302, let alonea 351.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed ![]() --Moates Quarter horse $225-- --Cobra intake $150-- --tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Doing a "roller conversion" on a non roller block is stupid. Do it right and get the link bar lifters.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
o ok....so any 351w can be made roller by using the retro fit lifters....ill probly do solid roller when i build my 408....unless thats not a good idea..... i have just heard so many different answers to questions about converting to roller and haveing to use a special cam or bot being able to go roller if it wasnt a roller to begin with....im just need one good straight answer |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Solid requires some maintenance from time to time in the form of adjusting valves. Not nearly as often as people will try to make you think. The people that say you have to "adjust valve lash all the time" have never owned a solid cam. Camshaft profiles can be more radial with a solid lifter and rpm and horsepower potential is greater as well. Valvetrain stability is better with a solid cam.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
1993 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Big, Texas
Posts: 229
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
How good are stock prorted 351w heads?
__________________
![]() Stock 5.0 Motor M/T Drag Radials E.T.- 13.859 MPH-97.23 60 foot-1.853 |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Not worth a damn. Most likely won't flow for shit because anybody that is good at porting won't waste the time on a set of stock 351W heads.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 351w swap
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 351w swap into 00 v6 | got poney | V6 Mustangs | 13 | March 15th, 2011 04:58 PM |
| 351w Swap | shadowgames81 | 5.0 Mustangs | 3 | March 23rd, 2009 06:43 PM |
| 351w swap guys, need your help! | built351w | 5.0 Mustangs | 11 | June 17th, 2008 02:19 PM |
| '93 LX Notchback needs a 351W swap | Velvet Leopard | 2.3 Mustangs | 1 | December 29th, 2006 03:15 PM |
| 1993 2.3L to 351W swap | Velvet Leopard | 5.0 Mustangs | 0 | December 19th, 2006 05:07 PM |