hit the dyno again. - Page 4
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old June 6th, 2009, 12:25 PM   #61
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
My white blower car had a 10.6 a/f ratio. That is where it accelerated the best. My black n/a car had an 11.5 a/f ratio when the tune was perfect......naturally aspirated! With my black car I told the guy the only way I would dyno it is if I could tune it. He agreed. The car made like 539rwhp and had an 11.5:1 a/f ratio. He told me that it was way too rich and needed alot less jet. I reminded him that I was tuning and not him. In the end, I didn't change much. Basically made a bunch of pulls to make sure everything was working correctly. I tuned the car at the track and it was dead on. I tuned it from 10.30s to 9.30s. A full second in tuning alone and when I went to the dyno the "tuner" told me my tune was wrong.

The perfect tune is the one that allows *your car* to accelerate the quickest (and be safe obviously). What works for Joe Blow's car might not work for your car. Tune tune tune is making passes down the track so you can see what gains if any your changes are giving you. But what do I know?
I get this 100% you said my tuner doesn't know what perfect is. I agree with you on that. But when "I" asked for safe. "I" asked for power under curve, and "I" wanted decent numbers... and he came through with all 3 of the above. So isn't that perfect for what I asked for? I didn't say it was maxing out my combo not once. But this is the second time repeating myselfo n what I just said in this post.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old June 6th, 2009, 12:31 PM   #62
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
Don't tell me to stop lol, I can't take constructive criticism. It's part of learning. If I'm wrong and you want to correct me, by all means. I know you have nothing against me. So go ahead through my last post and answer my questions please.

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
So when less air comes in the motor the maf just dumps a rediculous amount of fuel in. It doesn't just take in the less air from the tb, and keep the same fuel thats in it from the tune?

Also my idle issues have nothing to do with the tune. They'veh ad these problems since day one when I was n/a all motor.
The mass air flow sensor measures the air coming into the engine at all engine speeds at all times. That is how the computer calculates how much fuel to give the engine. When you change anything that affects airflow into the engine, the mass air flow sensor reports the change in airflow to the computer.

The idle may have something to do with your tune, you don't know for sure because you haven't solved the problem yet. I think we've discussed this before and it could be the throttle body but I don't remember for sure.

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
You said you don't understand why we dyno after changes... well, one to see the power difference, and two to make sure it's safe. Thats two reasons. And I said that because you dynoing your car at the track has nothing to do with anything.
You've got that wrong. Performance at the track is everything. You can dyno your little heart out and still never have the car tuned as good as you will tuning at a race track.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2009, 12:33 PM   #63
MM Fanatic
 
baine21225's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,349
baine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to baine21225
Default

__________________
"That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2009, 12:33 PM   #64
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
I get this 100% you said my tuner doesn't know what perfect is. I agree with you on that. But when "I" asked for safe. "I" asked for power under curve, and "I" wanted decent numbers... and he came through with all 3 of the above. So isn't that perfect for what I asked for? I didn't say it was maxing out my combo not once. But this is the second time repeating myselfo n what I just said in this post.
You said perfect tune, you are not repeating yourself. Why would you not want to tune every ounce of power out of your combo? That makes no sense to me. You may have gotten what you asked for but I guarantee it is not a perfect tune. We don't race dynos. I am repeating myself....
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2009, 12:45 PM   #65
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
You said perfect tune, you are not repeating yourself. Why would you not want to tune every ounce of power out of your combo? That makes no sense to me. You may have gotten what you asked for but I guarantee it is not a perfect tune. We don't race dynos. I am repeating myself....
I don't use the dyno to measure how fast it should go, it's for safety purposes as stated before, of course I'd it's power is a small measure of the fast this it was faster then before. But I don't race my car at the track, it's my dd and was built to make the drive less boreing. Thats why I'm to concerned with getting my combo 100%, but my tuner delivered with what I asked.

Now I'm GUESSING, not dyno racing so don't take this the wrong way. I did dyno on a mustang dyno, and this dyno in particular reads rather conservative. My tq was 418 wcf, i Know my cracked plugged didn't allow me to get an hp number, but wouldn't you say maybe around 440 or so? That to me is a little much for the stock block. That seems a little much for stock block to me.

My idle thing I don't get. It just dives betweens 500-1000 when cold, and once it's been drive it hits 0 on the tach and then bounces from there to 500. Just keeps me uneasy after ripping on it, Id get scared to death if it were to shut off on me.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2009, 06:21 PM   #66
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,778
superbean will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to superbean
Default

Very good stuff! If at all possible I try to tune everything myself via an e prom/emulator setup. Even though I am still an amatuer, I am capeable of tuning as well at 50% of the tuners out there.. and if I blow something out, it's my fault and I didn't spend hours on the dyno $$$$

But for sure, with those afr's, your car will run safely.. I say have him work on the idle issue, then take it to the track and the times will tell all!

Interesting note: Most boosted cars are tuned for 11.5:1 WOT AFR (Safe rich tune)... But I tuned a 7MGTE supra for a friend, the best track times were at 12.9 air fuel with less timing. Cut the car off right at the end of the 1/4 and coasted into the pits, pulled a plug.. looked perfect. . Who knows..
__________________
weeee foooord!

  Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2009, 02:20 PM   #67
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

12.9 lol. Either way. What can you do on a chip to control idle, or mess with it. I was under the impression that with iac tps and the idle screw was all there was. When I first paid to get it tuned, he messed with those, but it didn't fix it. This retune was free, were cool with eachother now, so I just toss him a couple bucks. However I don't like bugging him. He's a distributor of parts who happens to own a dyno to test his products, so he doesn't tune cars for a living. Most of his money is made over phone calls, conferences, and meetings.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2009, 07:22 PM   #68
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
12.9 lol. Either way. What can you do on a chip to control idle, or mess with it. I was under the impression that with iac tps and the idle screw was all there was. When I first paid to get it tuned, he messed with those, but it didn't fix it. This retune was free, were cool with eachother now, so I just toss him a couple bucks. However I don't like bugging him. He's a distributor of parts who happens to own a dyno to test his products, so he doesn't tune cars for a living. Most of his money is made over phone calls, conferences, and meetings.
Alot. Like I said in a previous post, one of my cars wouldn't even idle with the chip removed. With the chip it idled beautiful. The computer controls everything.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2009, 10:26 PM   #69
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
I don't use the dyno to measure how fast it should go, it's for safety purposes as stated before, of course I'd it's power is a small measure of the fast this it was faster then before. But I don't race my car at the track, it's my dd and was built to make the drive less boreing. Thats why I'm to concerned with getting my combo 100%, but my tuner delivered with what I asked.

Now I'm GUESSING, not dyno racing so don't take this the wrong way. I did dyno on a mustang dyno, and this dyno in particular reads rather conservative. My tq was 418 wcf, i Know my cracked plugged didn't allow me to get an hp number, but wouldn't you say maybe around 440 or so? That to me is a little much for the stock block. That seems a little much for stock block to me.

My idle thing I don't get. It just dives betweens 500-1000 when cold, and once it's been drive it hits 0 on the tach and then bounces from there to 500. Just keeps me uneasy after ripping on it, Id get scared to death if it were to shut off on me.

As far as the block goes. assuming there are "fresher" bearings, and everything is in good shape, it varies. Some blocks crack at high hp, and rpm, but are still making in the 400 lb ft ratings, some crack at 3000rpms with 550 lbft. I would say at 450/450@6000rpms, if your engine is fresh, youll be fine.
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 8th, 2009, 12:10 AM   #70
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,778
superbean will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to superbean
Default

12.9. Were hard core.

Forged pistons are race gas ftw
__________________
weeee foooord!

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: hit the dyno again.
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NastyStang Hit VMP's Dyno Today !! NastyFX4 2005 - 2010 29 May 17th, 2009 12:35 AM
Dyno Tune at Dyno Tuned Performance CW5billwade 99-04 18 March 20th, 2009 01:48 PM
Jan 19th Ft Myers - VMP Mobile Dyno - show, dyno runs and tuning by appointment Justin00Stang Southeast 0 January 4th, 2008 07:26 PM
Mustang Dyno vs Dyno Jet BLOWN89 5.0 Mustangs 18 December 1st, 2007 10:34 PM
Mustang Dyno Global Dyno Day! BadMoFo Southeast 1 September 20th, 2006 04:09 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.