| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang GT
SLOWER THAN OLD PEOPLE FUCK..:-(
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 2,075
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
lower octane = better performance??
so i've owned my car for close to a year now and i've always ran 93 octane in the car. when the dizzy was changed the timing was set back to stock 10* well yesterday i was about outta gas so i made a stop at a station that happened to be outta 93 but i needed some so i just filled it up with 89 octane. car ran the same as always yesterday but today...since its probably diluted all the 93 octane left. the car seems to be running waaaay stronger...could this be true or am i just imagining things??
__________________
![]() 1995 Mustang GT..4.30's,BBK Longtubes, Off Road X-Pipe,Magnaflow Catback,BBK Intake,BBK Underdrive Pulleys Walbro 255lph pump,accel dizzy,MSD Coil,MSD 8.5 Super Conductors,front sway bar removed, more coming soon. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Newbie
1995 mustang
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tifton, Georgia
Posts: 12
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i doubt that lower octane equals higher performance. if that were true drag cars would be running 89 octane instead of the 115 high octane race fuel.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang GT
SLOWER THAN OLD PEOPLE FUCK..:-(
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 2,075
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yes smart ass....i am fully aware of that i was asking in my specfic situation seeing as how my car is light years from a drag car
__________________
![]() 1995 Mustang GT..4.30's,BBK Longtubes, Off Road X-Pipe,Magnaflow Catback,BBK Intake,BBK Underdrive Pulleys Walbro 255lph pump,accel dizzy,MSD Coil,MSD 8.5 Super Conductors,front sway bar removed, more coming soon. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
MM Fanatic
1990 LX hatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
![]() Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Big Spoon
88 5.0 5 Speed Notch <><
never fast enough
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PHL -> PHX
Posts: 3,069
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
there is more fuel in the lower octane stuff. higher octane has more chemicals in it to prevent detonation so yes, there is more energy to be derived from lower octane fuel if your car doesn't knock on it.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
1994 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shawano, WI
Posts: 579
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
lower octane fuels wont burn as long when fired in the chamber, higher octane fuels burn longer in the chamber giving you a more power per injection (dont really know how to say it LOL) but you get more combustion power from the higher octane per same about of fuel * im cant remember 100 percent but i think thats pretty close if not im sure someone will correct me
__________________
www.moddedmustangs.com |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang GT
SLOWER THAN OLD PEOPLE FUCK..:-(
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 2,075
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
which is the reason i asked thanks....im not dumb i understand how combustion works....and if my timing was still set at 14* im guessing that the 93 octane would be necessary to prevent knocking and pinging but i asked since my timing is at 10* could 93 be too much octane for the amount of timing in the motor and that be the reason why the lower octane feels to run a lil stronger?
__________________
![]() 1995 Mustang GT..4.30's,BBK Longtubes, Off Road X-Pipe,Magnaflow Catback,BBK Intake,BBK Underdrive Pulleys Walbro 255lph pump,accel dizzy,MSD Coil,MSD 8.5 Super Conductors,front sway bar removed, more coming soon. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
you definitely dont need the extra octane but i really dont think you would notice a gain from backing down....maybe it was just a colder day or something?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MM Fanatic
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
was it cooler and dryer weather than normal? My car and especially my truck which is turbo runs like a raped ape when the weather is cold and dry which is only like 1 day per year here....LOL
Edit: Iwanna beat me to it
__________________
![]() People should think about boarding up their glass house before starting a rock fight! |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
at 14 degrees you can get away with 91 octane
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1995 Mustang GT
SLOWER THAN OLD PEOPLE FUCK..:-(
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 2,075
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
no the temp has been no different than its been for the past month or so...
__________________
![]() 1995 Mustang GT..4.30's,BBK Longtubes, Off Road X-Pipe,Magnaflow Catback,BBK Intake,BBK Underdrive Pulleys Walbro 255lph pump,accel dizzy,MSD Coil,MSD 8.5 Super Conductors,front sway bar removed, more coming soon. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1981 4 EYED FREAK
9.48@147
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: southwestern pa
Posts: 328
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i really cant see a difference from 89-93 in my car(on motor), but if i run 110, it runs like crap... the 110 burns way to slow for an 8.5:1 motor, i think stock 5.0s and 4.6s are in the 8.9:1 range, 89 would be ok for slower timing, but i would jump to 93 if you want to crank the timing up..
__________________
![]() www.rodeheavershotrod.com 9.48@147 on pump gas through the mufflers, still has pw,tilt,t-tops,all lights, wipers!!! , check out the vidhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SloE3Zdetac |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Razor's Edge
|
maybe its just responding better to the 10 degrees vice the 14......
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
meh
|
An octane rating is basically a fuel's resistance to detonation. The higher the number, the more resistant to detonation it is.
Higher octane fuel burns SLOWER than low octane fuels. Detonation is essentially the combustion of fuel BEFORE the piston gets to the top of its stroke. The piston is forced back down before it gets to the top, hence the lack of power and 'ping' sound. The 'ping' you hear is the low grade fuel combusting too early, which hammers your pistons and rods back down... very hard on internal parts. At the other extreme, if you put too high of octane fuel, the fuel will combust when the piston is on its downstroke; too late. Just a waste of money and less power than you could have. The ideal octane ratio for your engine depends on your timing, compression, and other specific engine configurations. You pretty much want to run as low of octane as you can without detonation.
__________________
'87 2.3 Notch with +4 cylinder mod ![]() Ass, Cash, or Grass.. nobody rides for free Black Stang Crew Member #11 |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Enthusiast
1994 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shawano, WI
Posts: 579
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i think i stated that above but you just when alot more in detail lol
__________________
www.moddedmustangs.com |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
However, I always run premimum just incase the dizzy were to move a bit or you go lean for a second at the track.. slow burning fuel is friendly fuel. Little squirt of race gas never hurt anyone.
__________________
weeee foooord!
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Regular
|
i would say this and in conjunction with your compression
__________________
88 5.0 with bbk shorties, bassani x-pipe w/o cats, custom 2.5in w/flowmasters. t-5 conversion, gt40p heads cobra upper and lower. stock SD. Plans: full black interior, black paint and supercharger??? |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Moderator
2003 Grand Cherokee
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,617
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
I Poop Entirely Way Too Much
Blown 03 GT
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 6,917
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: lower octane = better performance??
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 87 Octane | oldernewbie | The Clubhouse | 14 | October 2nd, 2008 04:33 PM |
| 93 Octane? | tsp_2177 | V6 Mustangs | 14 | December 13th, 2007 11:43 PM |
| 93 octane? | petrol_head | 5.0 Mustangs | 9 | July 16th, 2007 08:12 PM |
| staight line performance or track performance??? | andoutcomethewolves | V6 Mustangs | 12 | February 19th, 2007 11:34 AM |
| Which Octane? | bostonbands | 2005 - 2010 | 4 | December 2nd, 2006 10:05 PM |