need help head/intake install - Page 7
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack (5) Thread Tools
Old July 23rd, 2009, 02:09 PM   #121
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
ryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
With a chip, yes. I personally don't use a wideband for anything other than monitoring the a/f ratio. Quite honestly I rarely use a wideband on anything. I tune for the best acceleration, not for specific air/fuel ratios or peak horspower like some people are stuck on. I'll baseline on a dyno because curiousity gets the best of me but I rarely tune anything on a dyno unless I see an issue that needs to be addressed. I do all my tuning at the dragstrip.
This is why a lot of people run their best times just before the motor pops.
At least on forced induction cars, the cars will produce more power and torque at 12.5:1-13:1, but cylinder temps will get so high that you will melt pistons, plugs and everything in between. That is why most FI guys waste their time making sure A/Fs stay in the safe zone. With that said, a wideband is only as good as the person comparing the numbers to the spark plugs. A number is just a number.

For the other people, runner velocity, runner length, runner cross section, and runner volume all come into play in optimizing torque vs rpm range. There is a lot of complex calculus based math and years of engine design and tuning to back that up. Simply cutting the runner length in half without the corresponding changes in runner cross section and desired rpm range is a sure fire fail.
Shorter wider runners are optimized for higher rpm where cylinder filling has to occur at very high speed. Longer narrower runners are more efficient at low speed cylinder filling do to the ram effect of the velocity of the air in the runner. The most efficient intake runner is always the longest runner that does not inhibit air flow at the highest desired rpm.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out.
03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it
04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it
89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old July 23rd, 2009, 03:03 PM   #122
Regular
 
stfudvs's Avatar
 
302 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 328
stfudvs is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

The most efficient intake runner is always the longest runner that does not inhibit air flow at the highest desired rpm.

make some recomendations
__________________
if you were on a bicycle and we were going up hill i could beat you in a race
  Reply With Quote
Old July 23rd, 2009, 04:04 PM   #123
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,387
flyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by ryans88gt View Post
This is why a lot of people run their best times just before the motor pops.
At least on forced induction cars, the cars will produce more power and torque at 12.5:1-13:1, but cylinder temps will get so high that you will melt pistons, plugs and everything in between. That is why most FI guys waste their time making sure A/Fs stay in the safe zone. With that said, a wideband is only as good as the person comparing the numbers to the spark plugs. A number is just a number.

For the other people, runner velocity, runner length, runner cross section, and runner volume all come into play in optimizing torque vs rpm range. There is a lot of complex calculus based math and years of engine design and tuning to back that up. Simply cutting the runner length in half without the corresponding changes in runner cross section and desired rpm range is a sure fire fail.
Shorter wider runners are optimized for higher rpm where cylinder filling has to occur at very high speed. Longer narrower runners are more efficient at low speed cylinder filling do to the ram effect of the velocity of the air in the runner. The most efficient intake runner is always the longest runner that does not inhibit air flow at the highest desired rpm.
thank you
  Reply With Quote
Old July 23rd, 2009, 08:19 PM   #124
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

*cricket noises*
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 12:28 AM   #125
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by ryans88gt View Post
This is why a lot of people run their best times just before the motor pops.
At least on forced induction cars, the cars will produce more power and torque at 12.5:1-13:1, but cylinder temps will get so high that you will melt pistons, plugs and everything in between. That is why most FI guys waste their time making sure A/Fs stay in the safe zone. With that said, a wideband is only as good as the person comparing the numbers to the spark plugs. A number is just a number.

For the other people, runner velocity, runner length, runner cross section, and runner volume all come into play in optimizing torque vs rpm range. There is a lot of complex calculus based math and years of engine design and tuning to back that up. Simply cutting the runner length in half without the corresponding changes in runner cross section and desired rpm range is a sure fire fail.
Shorter wider runners are optimized for higher rpm where cylinder filling has to occur at very high speed. Longer narrower runners are more efficient at low speed cylinder filling do to the ram effect of the velocity of the air in the runner. The most efficient intake runner is always the longest runner that does not inhibit air flow at the highest desired rpm.
I've never melted anything down. I've always ran faster with a fatter a/f ratio than what internet experts say is optimal. I could give a shit about peak horsepower numbers. I do my tuning at the track. If the car goes faster, the tune went in the right direction. If the car slows down, the tune took a wrong turn.

I think I broke the rules with short runner intakes too. I've used them sucessfully without having to turn a million rpm. I must be on to something...
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 01:13 AM   #126
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,387
flyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
I think I broke the rules with short runner intakes too. I've used them sucessfully without having to turn a million rpm. I must be on to something...
You see I took a venture to the dark side and owned two buick grand nationals, a gmc typhoon and currently own a gmc syclone. Using that method you mentioned above would have cost me motor after motor no matter how good of forged parts I used. I've seen it happen tons of time. Because of that I've always tuned my turbo gm's on the street watching afr's all the while.

These cars can take a little more detonation then those gm's I've owned but I'd still be pretty leary of that method but we both know you know your shit so rock on
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 10:29 AM   #127
MM Fanatic
 
baine21225's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,349
baine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to baine21225
Default

grand national ftw
__________________
"That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 12:30 PM   #128
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by flyin ryan View Post
You see I took a venture to the dark side and owned two buick grand nationals, a gmc typhoon and currently own a gmc syclone. Using that method you mentioned above would have cost me motor after motor no matter how good of forged parts I used. I've seen it happen tons of time. Because of that I've always tuned my turbo gm's on the street watching afr's all the while.

These cars can take a little more detonation then those gm's I've owned but I'd still be pretty leary of that method but we both know you know your shit so rock on
If you can read a spark plug, you don't need any a/f gauge. Like I said, I've never melted anything down whether it was naturally aspirated, nitrous or boosted. There is no danger tuning the way I do. No danger at all. What do you think they did before widebands were so mainstream? The engines are still the same. A/F gauges are for people that can't read plugs and would rather rely on something electrical that can fail or be inaccurate. The spark plugs will never lie to you.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 01:38 PM   #129
MM Fanatic
 
baine21225's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,349
baine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to baine21225
Default

.....some of us can't read plugs
__________________
"That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 02:15 PM   #130
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Plug reading is awsome but it dosent help when you are reading them thru the new holes you just put in your pistons.




J/k
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 02:46 PM   #131
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,387
flyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really niceflyin ryan is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
If you can read a spark plug, you don't need any a/f gauge. Like I said, I've never melted anything down whether it was naturally aspirated, nitrous or boosted. There is no danger tuning the way I do. No danger at all. What do you think they did before widebands were so mainstream? The engines are still the same. A/F gauges are for people that can't read plugs and would rather rely on something electrical that can fail or be inaccurate. The spark plugs will never lie to you.
True and that method has worked for soo many for so long but what about when you have a setup that's on the edge or doesn't have a decent built bottom end in it. It's just not worth the risk in my opinion. Id' rather dial the car in before running the shit out of it opposed to taking a car untuned and runing it hard pass after pass until you find the sweet spot you know what I mean. Im like that prob because of my years with turbo gm cars.. the factory rods and pistions in the syclone and typhoons are complete shit. A little detonation with them and good by motor. Even with built motor with eagle rods and je pistions detonation kills em quick so it's pretty important to have a wideband and datalog regularly especially with the weather changes.

Plus not everyone has access to a track to make passes, pull over and yank plugs and repeat.
  Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 03:05 PM   #132
MM Fanatic
 
baine21225's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,349
baine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to baine21225
Default

anyone wanna do a plug reading seminar?
__________________
"That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 01:23 AM   #133
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by flyin ryan View Post
True and that method has worked for soo many for so long but what about when you have a setup that's on the edge or doesn't have a decent built bottom end in it. It's just not worth the risk in my opinion. Id' rather dial the car in before running the shit out of it opposed to taking a car untuned and runing it hard pass after pass until you find the sweet spot you know what I mean. Im like that prob because of my years with turbo gm cars.. the factory rods and pistions in the syclone and typhoons are complete shit. A little detonation with them and good by motor. Even with built motor with eagle rods and je pistions detonation kills em quick so it's pretty important to have a wideband and datalog regularly especially with the weather changes.

Plus not everyone has access to a track to make passes, pull over and yank plugs and repeat.

If you "run the shit out of the car" before you tune it, that's your problem. Nobody makes full WOT passes with an untuned car.....unless they're stupid.

I don't think you need to tell me what is important and what is not with racing. I have a little bit of experience and I think my combinations speak for themselves....
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 01:56 AM   #134
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
93mustank will become famous soon enough93mustank will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
If you "run the shit out of the car" before you tune it, that's your problem. Nobody makes full WOT passes with an untuned car.....unless they're stupid.

I don't think you need to tell me what is important and what is not with racing. I have a little bit of experience and I think my combinations speak for themselves....
Yet to see any of Flyin Ryan's 1/4 times.....................
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 11:29 AM   #135
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
ryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
If you can read a spark plug, you don't need any a/f gauge. Like I said, I've never melted anything down whether it was naturally aspirated, nitrous or boosted. There is no danger tuning the way I do. No danger at all. What do you think they did before widebands were so mainstream? The engines are still the same. A/F gauges are for people that can't read plugs and would rather rely on something electrical that can fail or be inaccurate. The spark plugs will never lie to you.
You said you tune for max accel and now you tune based on plugs? which is it? I know you have lots of experience with NA cars darrell, but FI cars will not tolerate tuning for max accel. As I said, max torque and power will be made in the range where heat is the highest, which will result in a melt down sooner or later, no matter how much you spent on those pistons. With a NA car, it is a lot tougher getting cylinder temps hot enough to melt pistons. Owning a cobra putting down 23 PSI and over 600 hp through a little 4.6, A/F is a very real concern. Ignore it and you will find 8 of these in your motor

__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out.
03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it
04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it
89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it

  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 11:39 AM   #136
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by ryans88gt View Post
You said you tune for max accel and now you tune based on plugs? which is it? I know you have lots of experience with NA cars darrell, but FI cars will not tolerate tuning for max accel. As I said, max torque and power will be made in the range where heat is the highest, which will result in a melt down sooner or later, no matter how much you spent on those pistons. With a NA car, it is a lot tougher getting cylinder temps hot enough to melt pistons. Owning a cobra putting down 23 PSI and over 600 hp through a little 4.6, A/F is a very real concern. Ignore it and you will find 8 of these in your motor

Yep, run the car softly until the plugs look good. Usually make a 300 foot pass and shut it down and then keep working up to a full pass. Then I fatten the mixture from there until the car loses mph. Pretty simple and easy method.

For the record, I'm no stranger to boosted or nitrous cars. I don't know where you got that from but I have a bit of experience with power adders.

My last daily driver made 562hp to the tires with a 302..... No a/f gauge.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 12:01 PM   #137
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

The plug thing seems like a, oops to late method if your not smart about it. Well good thing widebands are attainable these days. Pulling a plug even with a wideband is still important though.

With my horrid valve spring problems, for some reason my plugs turned african black after I drove it again for the first time. But theres nothing on the wide band but normal readings.


My wide band is bunged into the left side of the hpipe before the cross over, so its more on one bank. So far it reads accuratly but it still leaves me a little worried
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 12:24 PM   #138
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78 View Post
The plug thing seems like a, oops to late method if your not smart about it. Well good thing widebands are attainable these days. Pulling a plug even with a wideband is still important though.

With my horrid valve spring problems, for some reason my plugs turned african black after I drove it again for the first time. But theres nothing on the wide band but normal readings.


My wide band is bunged into the left side of the hpipe before the cross over, so its more on one bank. So far it reads accuratly but it still leaves me a little worried
A wide band will never tell you information about a specific cylinder. It will just tell you what the general a/f ratio is. If you have one cylinder that is lean and the rest are a little rich, you will never know until the engine melts down. You will never have that problem pulling plugs if you know how to read them.

Shouldn't be an issue on the street because who drives around wide open throttle on the street long enough to wreck anything????
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 12:50 PM   #139
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
A wide band will never tell you information about a specific cylinder. It will just tell you what the general a/f ratio is. If you have one cylinder that is lean and the rest are a little rich, you will never know until the engine melts down. You will never have that problem pulling plugs if you know how to read them.

Shouldn't be an issue on the street because who drives around wide open throttle on the street long enough to wreck anything????
That was my point.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old July 25th, 2009, 05:25 PM   #140
MM Fanatic
 
baine21225's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,349
baine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura aboutbaine21225 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to baine21225
Default

so can someone please explain to me how to read plugs?
__________________
"That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/5-0-mustangs/128916-need-help-head-intake-install.html
Posted By For Type Date
MidSouth Drag Racing • View topic - Another Stupid Colorado Drivers thread. 225cc AFR's on a 5.3 This thread Refback February 18th, 2010 10:17 PM
MidSouth Drag Racing • View topic - Another Stupid Colorado Drivers thread. 225cc AFR's on a 5.3 This thread Refback July 23rd, 2009 11:08 AM
MidSouth Drag Racing • View topic - Another Stupid Colorado Drivers thread. 225cc AFR's on a 5.3 This thread Refback July 22nd, 2009 05:13 PM
MidSouth Drag Racing • View topic - Another Stupid Colorado Drivers thread. 225cc AFR's on a 5.3 This thread Refback July 22nd, 2009 03:57 PM
5.3L with new TFS 205 heads - Page 5 - 355Nation Chevy Colorado & GMC Canyon Forum This thread Refback July 22nd, 2009 03:01 AM

Threads Similar to: need help head/intake install
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
head lights install hedgehog 4V / SVT 0 November 8th, 2008 11:53 AM
5.0 need a tune after head and intake install? kid 5.0 Mustangs 17 April 23rd, 2008 12:02 AM
99 head unit install bubagump17 99-04 0 December 4th, 2007 03:02 PM
head unit install (yes another 1) BlackIce Audio/Video 4 February 22nd, 2007 04:34 PM
Need Help With Head Unit Install Teggy_Boy Audio/Video 1 January 18th, 2007 06:54 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.