| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
Edelbrock Carb
Are the Edelbrock Carbs any good? I was looking at getting a 750 CFM Edelbrock 9907 for my 93 mustang with a 351W.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
They run. They are not really a good performance carb. They are much more complicated than a Holley. I've used a couple Edelbrock/Carter carbs many years ago. I'll never use another one.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Big Spoon
88 5.0 5 Speed Notch <><
never fast enough
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PHL -> PHX
Posts: 2,999
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm the opposite. I never was happy with a holley. I foun'd myself spending too much time tweaking. With the carter / edlebrock I found them to be more of a set it and forget it carb.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
there is no set it and forget it carb. It has to be tuned no matter what it's going on.
__________________
weeee foooord!
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Big Spoon
88 5.0 5 Speed Notch <><
never fast enough
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PHL -> PHX
Posts: 2,999
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
any holly I have used on a daily driver was a pain. I found myself tweaking it much more than I would have liked to. I agree that there is no set it and forget it carb because at the track, you will always be trying to squeeze every last bit of power out of it by tweaking it. Even the edlebrocks are easy for that - no fuel mess because everything loads from the top. The only thing that can be trickey is modding the point at wich the secondary air valve opens because they use weights.... you dont want to take too much off or you will have a turd.
I know other folks that love quadrajets. Everyone has their opinion and this is mine. 750 is too big for a 351. go with a 650. |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
750 is not too big for a 351. A dyno will prove that. I've ran a 750 Holley on a 289 several years ago....and it made more horsepower across the board than the 600cfm that I took off. Some 350 Chevys used a 795cfm Quadrajet. A carb that is "too big" isn't always a bad thing.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
89 GT, 92 LX
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 119
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I ran an 750 edelbrock on my blown 347 for years and never had any problems. Never even touched it once it was set. I bought a new holley and never got it to work more than a day before i had to make adjustments again.
You will get alot of different answers to this question based on what each person had experienced. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
The Big Spoon
88 5.0 5 Speed Notch <><
never fast enough
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PHL -> PHX
Posts: 2,999
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
They were used. I was in the same boat as you. I am plenty familiar with how they work.
I still think that a 750 is too big. 750 will work great on a blown 347 because it is operating on an engine that is more than 100% volumetric efficient. Most of the problems i've seen with holleys is that people run them with an accelerator pump cam that is too big causing a slight surge when you mash it than it'll go. The problems I had was that the mixture needles always got gummed up causing a crappy idle. Will I ever us a holley again? Sure. But on a daily I prefer the Edlebrock. Last edited by jessemachone; July 3rd, 2009 at 09:26 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1986 lx notch
9.98 @ 135
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,421
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I think the reason holleys ( or any carb for that matter ) get a bad rap is because people are cheap bastards ! They'll spend 50 bucks on a swap meet carb, try to rebuild it then ( or just toss it on ) then bitch and moan that they're junk. Spend the money on a decent carb and you'll avoid a ton of headaches. Oh yea 750 is perfect for a 351. my buddy used to run a holley 750 on his mild 302 in his daily driven 85 gt.
__________________
![]() " Spending money I don't have.... on things I don't need .... to impress people I don't know " . |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
I had an 85 Mustang that I put a 289 in and it was my daily driver back in the early 90s. It had a 750 Holley. Putting that carb on was a night and day difference over the 600 that was on it. I ran a 1150 Dominator on my black notch. That carb was way too big and I new it but I only wanted to buy one more carb and I would eventually need a carb that big. It was worth 13hp minimum across the board than the 1000HP that I originally had on it even though it was "too big".
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Edelbrock Carb
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Edelbrock Carb Problems!?!?!? | Mike Johnson | 5.0 Mustangs | 8 | March 6th, 2008 07:29 PM |
| edelbrock | Mustang RacR94 | 4V / SVT | 1 | February 18th, 2008 12:33 PM |
| edelbrock | Mustang RacR94 | 99-04 | 4 | February 17th, 2008 08:24 PM |
| Edelbrock | zinc02GT | The Clubhouse | 11 | January 22nd, 2008 12:28 AM |