| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Scat rotating or.... in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. Ok guys, i got a 351 windsor motor and plan on doin a393 stroker. I ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
Scat rotating or....
Ok guys, i got a 351 windsor motor and plan on doin a393 stroker. I want a kit that will give me relaibility and power up to 1000hp, not sure if ill push that much right away but....i know scat is good, i hear ppl talk good stuff on probe, me ive never heard of probe, i know chp sells the kits, but what can anyone tell me???? please help me lol ......id rather spend the money on a expensive kit to get quality then to get junk. im gona be procharging it with an f2 cog belt setup at 20lbs or so.. yea i am having the block race prepped. it is the stock block and i do know they can handle some abuse and high horsepower over 600. now this will be a car that wont get driven all the time or driven for long distances. I just wanna know if id be better for spending the money on scat or maybe a different company????
__________________
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
1994 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shawano, WI
Posts: 573
|
ive heard good things about probe, chp, and scat so whatever one you pick shouldnt be an issue its more personal pref.
__________________
![]() My Daily Driver |
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 1,742
|
id go another direction that scat if you are wanting big power numbers.
__________________
1989coupe 419w/c4/2 stages of the smack faster than you faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
hey thanks guys for all the info, so basically those 3 groups are good, thats good to know..i appreciate it
and 86er, you said if i want big power to not go with scat?
__________________
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 1,742
|
ive had 4 friends use scat, and well thats what they did, scatter.
Probe is who Id use if you want to turn the wick up later. but opinions are like assholes...........
__________________
1989coupe 419w/c4/2 stages of the smack faster than you faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 868
|
just hit up woody at fordstrokers. He's starting to offer some pretty high horsepower crazy built motors. And he's pretty open to letting you choose the internals.
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,356
|
Now you are stepping into the area of aftermarket blocks, billet cranks and billet rods. I also have to ask why a 393?
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
well yes i am using a stock block, and its just to get me started and get some money for a aftermarket block, but 393, i didnt want to go all the way with 0.060 so, incase i had to tear into the motor again. but yea
__________________
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
i know the stock block will handle 600 or more horsepower easy. especially with the motor built right and good internals
__________________
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
i actually from another 351 from the same guy i bought the first one from and ill have that as a back up motor, but just being curious, what do you guys prefer, or heard and would suggest for a aftermarket company.
__________________
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 1,742
|
most if not all strokers for the 9.5 block use a .030 over bore, its the rod and strokes that change to up the inches.
__________________
1989coupe 419w/c4/2 stages of the smack faster than you faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,356
|
A .060 bore has nothing to do with what I was talking about. Why use a 3.85 stroke crank and a rotating assembly that balances for shit when you could go with a 4.00 stroke and have a 408.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
well i dont even have the procharger yet, but will be getting one. so a 408 would be better then?
__________________
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
1989 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 315
|
Sounds like you need to do some more research man, Also either down the HP requirements or up the amount of money your going to spend it sounds like (i.e. on an aftermarket block etc)
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,356
|
I'd do a 427 (4.125 bore x 4.00 stroke) in a Dart or World block with a billet crank and rods. Then throw all the boost you can at it.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
yea i know i need more research, but i do appreciate all you guys helpin me out. well i think what ill prolly end up doin for now, is a 500 or so horse windsor and go from there, cause i really know what i need for big power, just the matter of money.
__________________
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1988 T-top 5.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,507
|
__________________
1988 LX T-top 5.0: 70mm BBK Throttle Body 4.10 gears BBK shorties, Pypes O/R X-pipe, Dumped Flowpaths Pro 5.0 shifter |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,774
|
1000 hp?!?! 880 whp??!?!
damn id be so happy with 300whp ![]() I say build an NA 408
__________________
weeee foooord!
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1988 T-top 5.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,507
|
![]() My brother's friend had an NA 408 in his 93 cobra and made 6xxhp. I'll try to find a video of it.
__________________
1988 LX T-top 5.0: 70mm BBK Throttle Body 4.10 gears BBK shorties, Pypes O/R X-pipe, Dumped Flowpaths Pro 5.0 shifter |
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 176
|
lol yea he could make 1000hp but for how long.....i know i can make more then 700 800 easy, but whether not the entier motor will hold up for so long or not. but i am now lookin into for later a world 351 block so i can stroke out big time, i am goin to make over 1000hp soon enough, im crazy for power and usin it for the street.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Scat rotating or....
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5.4 rotating assembly... | BakerFX4 | 99-04 | 10 | May 9th, 2009 08:01 AM |
| 07 rotating assembly | 07 STROKER | Engine | 0 | February 2nd, 2009 04:01 PM |
| SCAT Rod issue | Caddpro | 5.0 Mustangs | 10 | June 8th, 2008 09:19 PM |
| Rotating Assembly | J Mac0123 | 99-04 | 13 | October 3rd, 2007 01:07 PM |
| Rotating assy | shamntgmry | 99-04 | 37 | September 10th, 2007 01:11 PM |