which rotating assembly should i get?

88Saleen · December 5th, 2009, 06:19 PM

hey, building a 331... well actualy a 336? it will be .040 because it was already .030 over and it needs to be straightened. so exactly what the title says, which one did you buy and why.. and did you like it? what kinda power did you build with it and is it N/A?

duckfart · December 6th, 2009, 10:29 AM

I went forged crank. SRP pistons , eagle rods 1.6 cobra rockers, all good stuff. Also had 15hrs into head porting and only produced 341 rwhp my mistake was the cam, I left alot of power in that block.

so do your homework!

ReverendDexter · December 6th, 2009, 10:33 AM

Put your asbestos underwear on, man; you're gonna get hammered with "go 347" posts.

Just curious, but why did you chose 331 over 347? All I hear here is the pro-347 propaganda, it'd be nice to hear the logic from the other side.

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 11:21 AM

nope not doing the 16 cube argument again. im wondering what kit you guys got and why. how good i served you and what kind of power your building. sorry i have had the 331 vs 347 argument one too many times. its what i want. but thanks tho

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 11:22 AM

Originally Posted by duckfart

I went forged crank. SRP pistons , eagle rods 1.6 cobra rockers, all good stuff. Also had 15hrs into head porting and only produced 341 rwhp my mistake was the cam, I left alot of power in that block. so do your homework!

ok thanks, helps out a lot. i dont think im ganna go forged crank, just because i dont plan on building a super amout of HP. planning around 400-450 to the wheels. what cam did you use?

ReverendDexter · December 6th, 2009, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by 88Saleen

nope not doing the 16 cube argument again. im wondering what kit you guys got and why. how good i served you and what kind of power your building. sorry i have had the 331 vs 347 argument one too many times. its what i want. but thanks tho

Why does everyone assume that if you ask about something you did that you're gonna argue with them that they're wrong?

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 11:29 AM

because it has happened time and time again. sorry i assume things that thend to repeat themselves. im sure what i have to say you will have something else to say to defend your position.. kinda like an argument and im not going there.

baine21225 · December 6th, 2009, 11:34 AM

Scat or Eagle, I hope you get beat by a 347

ReverendDexter · December 6th, 2009, 11:39 AM

Originally Posted by 88Saleen

because it has happened time and time again. sorry i assume things that thend to repeat themselves. im sure what i have to say you will have something else to say to defend your position.. kinda like an argument and im not going there.

:facepalm

Dude, I don't have a position to defend.

I looked over your arguments in another thread, though. What I saw amounted to basically "I was told it was better by some engine builders and machinists".

Being that I've got my answer, I'll leave your thread alone now

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 11:41 AM

see there goes more ignorance... and i hurd eagle is junk. i talked to my engine builder and he has had eagle cranks with 2 and 3 different rod journal sizes. and not just one, but a handful of eagle cranks he said. so i was thinking scat. i was on stage 3 motorsports and see their 331 street fighter kit. it showed the highest compression ratio i have seen yet. 10.1:1. im looking to make 10.5:1 but with twisted wedge heads its ganna be tough.

baine21225 · December 6th, 2009, 11:53 AM

If you already have your mind made up why are you here? Sounds like you're here to argue.....Mr I don't want to argue....

I would strongly suggest finding a new machine shop/engine builder because if this guy thinks Eagle is junk and 347 have wrist pin issues and burn oil then he obviously isn't even worth the gas you spent driving there.

and do you know what ignorance is? it is lacking knowledge or awareness if my education serves me correctly, so unless you give a valid argument so show that you actually know what your talking about instead of "my super duper godly engine builder and friend told me this, this, and this" then you are the ignorant one

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 12:02 PM

lol i just want to know what kit you got and if you liked it. and what kinda power you made.

laztug · December 6th, 2009, 12:31 PM

Originally Posted by baine21225

Scat or Eagle, I hope you get beat by a 347

93mustank · December 6th, 2009, 12:32 PM

Why are you going .030 to .040 over?

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by 93mustank

Why are you going .030 to .040 over?

because the block is already .030 over. and im sure i wont be in spec. so i think i will have to go .040 over.

93mustank · December 6th, 2009, 12:43 PM

Why wouldnt it be in spec? Whats wrong with it?

88Saleen · December 6th, 2009, 01:14 PM

Originally Posted by 93mustank

Why wouldnt it be in spec? Whats wrong with it?

its been a while since the last time it was machined and honed. do idk i was going to have it measured to see if it was in spec or not. is there something i should know about not going .040 over?

December 5th, 2009, 06:19 PM	#1
88Saleen Enthusiast 1988 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan Posts: 660	which rotating assembly should i get? hey, building a 331... well actualy a 336? it will be .040 because it was already .030 over and it needs to be straightened. so exactly what the title says, which one did you buy and why.. and did you like it? what kinda power did you build with it and is it N/A?

December 6th, 2009, 10:29 AM	#2
duckfart Regular 1992 mustang LX 7.21 1/8 mi Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: washington st. Posts: 71	I went forged crank. SRP pistons , eagle rods 1.6 cobra rockers, all good stuff. Also had 15hrs into head porting and only produced 341 rwhp my mistake was the cam, I left alot of power in that block. so do your homework! __________________ c'mon sunshine !!

December 6th, 2009, 10:33 AM	#3
ReverendDexter (needs the) Driver Mod Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert 6.5 seconds off TTOD :( Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Rosa, CA Posts: 8,210	Put your asbestos underwear on, man; you're gonna get hammered with "go 347" posts. Just curious, but why did you chose 331 over 347? All I hear here is the pro-347 propaganda, it'd be nice to hear the logic from the other side. __________________ O o /¯/______________________ \|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ TheUNZippee! is right! Let us all BOW to his unerring ways in a respectful, nay, obsequious manner!

December 6th, 2009, 11:34 AM	#8
baine21225 MM Fanatic Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 4,309	Scat or Eagle, I hope you get beat by a 347 __________________ "Whip out your dick you'll either get it sucked or get smacked..." "That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."

December 6th, 2009, 11:53 AM	#11
baine21225 MM Fanatic Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 4,309	If you already have your mind made up why are you here? Sounds like you're here to argue.....Mr I don't want to argue.... I would strongly suggest finding a new machine shop/engine builder because if this guy thinks Eagle is junk and 347 have wrist pin issues and burn oil then he obviously isn't even worth the gas you spent driving there. and do you know what ignorance is? it is lacking knowledge or awareness if my education serves me correctly, so unless you give a valid argument so show that you actually know what your talking about instead of "my super duper godly engine builder and friend told me this, this, and this" then you are the ignorant one __________________ "Whip out your dick you'll either get it sucked or get smacked..." "That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it... and it's worked out pretty well so far..."

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement

December 6th, 2009, 11:21 AM	#4
88Saleen Enthusiast 1988 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan Posts: 660	nope not doing the 16 cube argument again. im wondering what kit you guys got and why. how good i served you and what kind of power your building. sorry i have had the 331 vs 347 argument one too many times. its what i want. but thanks tho

December 6th, 2009, 11:29 AM	#7
88Saleen Enthusiast 1988 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan Posts: 660	because it has happened time and time again. sorry i assume things that thend to repeat themselves. im sure what i have to say you will have something else to say to defend your position.. kinda like an argument and im not going there.

December 6th, 2009, 11:41 AM	#10
88Saleen Enthusiast 1988 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan Posts: 660	see there goes more ignorance... and i hurd eagle is junk. i talked to my engine builder and he has had eagle cranks with 2 and 3 different rod journal sizes. and not just one, but a handful of eagle cranks he said. so i was thinking scat. i was on stage 3 motorsports and see their 331 street fighter kit. it showed the highest compression ratio i have seen yet. 10.1:1. im looking to make 10.5:1 but with twisted wedge heads its ganna be tough.

December 6th, 2009, 12:02 PM	#12
88Saleen Enthusiast 1988 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan Posts: 660	lol i just want to know what kit you got and if you liked it. and what kinda power you made.

December 6th, 2009, 12:32 PM	#14
93mustank Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Phoenix,AZ Posts: 2,853	Why are you going .030 to .040 over? __________________ “No track close to me, but with my old stock head, E cam setup N/A I was hitting 14 flat at 105 on cheap street tires using a G-tech” "I want some nice super high flow CAST IRON heads. " PeteAndersonRacing.com

December 6th, 2009, 12:43 PM	#16
93mustank Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Phoenix,AZ Posts: 2,853	Why wouldnt it be in spec? Whats wrong with it? __________________ “No track close to me, but with my old stock head, E cam setup N/A I was hitting 14 flat at 105 on cheap street tires using a G-tech” "I want some nice super high flow CAST IRON heads. " PeteAndersonRacing.com

Threads Similar to: which rotating assembly should i get?
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
5.4 rotating assembly...	BakerFX4	99-04	10	May 9th, 2009 08:01 AM
07 rotating assembly	07 STROKER	Engine	0	February 2nd, 2009 04:01 PM
Rotating Assembly?	NMR-2vGT	96-98	36	January 31st, 2008 05:15 PM
Rotating Assembly	J Mac0123	99-04	13	October 3rd, 2007 01:07 PM
FS: Rotating Assembly w/other items	68 dlxcoupe	For Sale	0	September 12th, 2006 01:22 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.