| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Explorer Intake
what year is the good intake and with emissions provision? Is it 97 1/2 newer or older?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
Newer.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [B][U]MM Sapper Squad[/U][/B] [QUOTE=Regency 2007;1676187]MSO's stupidity has never stopped amazing me since the day he joined this forum.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
from what engine? everytime i ask for one from a 5.0 they act retarded. Also heard about mountaineers intake same as explorer(what yr) true or not?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
From what engine??? the 5.0 explorer 97.5 or newer.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [B][U]MM Sapper Squad[/U][/B] [QUOTE=Regency 2007;1676187]MSO's stupidity has never stopped amazing me since the day he joined this forum.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Are all junkyards personel retarded? Every yard that I have contact for the explorer intake they all tell me that there are 3 different lower and 2 different upper. They ask me for casting number. Does anyone know the casting # or is it any 97 1/2 5.0 intake?
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
I thought all Explorer 5 liter intakes were the same and just the heads were different. I wonder what the differences in the intakes are.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thats what i keep telling them but they keep telling me the same thing?
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
As far as the topic creator's wanting "emission provision." I'm not sure what you're refering too. What is the sensor in the lower intake, I forget the acronym. I'm pretty sure you have to drill that yourself. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
what i mean is the egr spacer. i might but wrong but don't some year have the egr and some don't?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jville,NC
Posts: 197
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
The sensor is the act and ya thats what i ran into any ideas on the size of tap i need.
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,027
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
my explorer intake does not have the center egr port, but the stock one next to it does:
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
|
This is what the junkyard guy sees in the computer when he looks up a 1998 Explorer intake manifold.
6-244 (4.0L), SOHC, upper 6-244 (4.0L), SOHC, lower 6-244 (4.0L), OHV, upper 6-244 (4.0L), OHV, lower 8-302 (5.0L), upper, thru 5/7/98 8-302 (5.0L), lower, ID F67E-BB 8-302 (5.0L), lower, ID F87E-CA 8-302 (5.0L), lower, ID XL2E-AB 8-302 (5.0L), upper, from 5/8/98 This is taken from Car-Part. com a website which allows you to search junkyards inventory without messing with the sales person. I was one of those dumb junkyard guys at one time. If they look into the Hollander notes they can probably tell you the difference if they know how to work the system properly. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 46
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
so which of those is the more desireable? or does it not matter?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 27
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Late 97 up 5.0 Explorers and Mountaineers have an internal EGR ehxaust passage (the intake shown above with the hole).Early 97 and back have an external EGR valve and an exhaust tube that comes off the RH exhaust manifold and goes up to the valve.(The intake shown without the hole) If you are going to run an EGR system you will need the later design (with the hole)unless you want to rig up some sort of feed off your headers.(a pain) I have 6 late ones and one early design.I bought a bunch of 99-00 5.0 Explorers a few years back at the salvage pool as I was fixing them for sale.One of them is my winter ride now.I took a 1997 5.0 chassis and put a 99 body on it.Painted it two tone Shadow Blue/Smoke grey to match my '88 GT convt. Mustang. That way I don't miss the 'Stang as much all winter...
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 27
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
15 minute edit.Only forum I have ever joined with that stipulation.I personally would go with an after market intake or a gt-40.I have a trickflow track heat,but if I had to do over,I would go with a gt-40.(or that BBK cross ram X unit;looks good and it works!)
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,027
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
||
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 27
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yea,I know the Explorer intakes are strong runners,but their so DAMN ugly..and heavy.i still think the gt-40 is the best damn all around intake out there for the 5.0.
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,027
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 27
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Huh.I didn't know that.Does the plenum come apart?Like an Edelbrock?
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jville,NC
Posts: 197
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
no
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Explorer Intake
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| explorer intake | notsoslow50 | 5.0 Mustangs | 8 | August 23rd, 2007 09:41 PM |
| explorer intake | patwrecked | 5.0 Mustangs | 1 | July 18th, 2007 06:52 AM |
| Explorer Intake | 95blackbeauty | 94-95 | 5 | April 16th, 2007 10:20 PM |
| explorer heads and intake | coreyfitz | 5.0 Mustangs | 14 | November 26th, 2006 05:09 PM |