| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 347 vortech V-2
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
My Engine combo, and future upgrades, Help!!!
Hi Guys,
I am looking forward to getting advice from E3Sean, Jbig, and Mustank and the rest of the of the room, pertaining to my question. I want to make it clear that I bought the car with these mods already done. It looks as if someone just randonly picked parts out of a magazine ad. I think the intake is wrong, the throttle body is too small etc, but now I am adding a 9 lb supercharger so it all changes. here are a list of mods. 331 dss stroker main support system trick flow street heat heads 170's trick flow R series intake 24 lb injectors (will be upgraded to 42lb for supercharger) high flow water pump griff 4 core alum radiator elec fan with heat sensor msd 6A msd Billit disribtor 1.6 roller rockers trick flow stage 2 cam C&L 73 mm Mass Air (I have a PRO-M with fuel optemizer for supercharger) BBK 70 MM throttle body BBK shorty headers BBK H-pipe 255 lph fuel pump 3:73 rear The stock rev limiter is still in the car, I might take it to the track a couple times a year, driveability is a major issue, I will only put 2-5k miles a year on this car if that but I do want to be able to do some cruise ins, and be able to drive it when I want on pump gas. Compression is 9:5 to 1 Thanks
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown! |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
12.8@103... stock motor
11.8@113...150 shot
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 464
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
what's your question?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM Fanatic
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,810
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Intake is fine, cam with supercharger is not the best. Too much overlap. Even TF will tell you that. I would jump to 75mm TB, and add a boost a pump if you are still running the stock fuel lines/rails. A bigger head wouldn't hurt, but that's your call. That's my opinion...
__________________
A whole bunch of crap that makes the car go fast |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 347 vortech V-2
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
The question is the combo in general. What could I do to tweak the performance of the car yet remain a dependable driver. Is there anything in this current combo hurting performance?
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown! |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Intake Closing: 39° ABDC Exhaust Opening: 53° BBDC Exhaust Closing: 1° BTDC 4 degrees at .050 is too much?
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Truthfully its a boosted motor...If you want more power put more boost through it. Make sure the tune and fuel are up to par and crank up the boost for more power.
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 347 vortech V-2
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thank you, Who would you suggest to grind the cam?
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown! |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
12.8@103... stock motor
11.8@113...150 shot
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 464
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
he will suggest jay allen at camshaft innovations...
he is very good... however it will be a while before you can get your cam... he is having some issues with his health right now... there are other cam grinders out there who know what they are doing also. jay just seems to be the most popular. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 347 vortech V-2
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I hear he is fantastic, although I would like to get the cam within 3-4 weeks if possible, any other suggestions?
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown! |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
12.8@103... stock motor
11.8@113...150 shot
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 464
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ed curtis is another popular cam grinder, so is buddy rawls.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
MM Fanatic
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,810
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I would say so.... Why would you want to blow ANY of your boost out your exhaust... That's just silly and will hurt your overall psi... I'm no expert by any means, but you should prolly stick to your N/A motors... Not to mention that 4 degrees is a .050... and the cam is 542/563 which will inflate that 4 degree number, now won't it... mister cam expert...
__________________
A whole bunch of crap that makes the car go fast |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
The total lift with 1.6 rockers affects the the 4 degrees???? Its measured at .050 how in the hell would it inflate.... Oh and buy the way the tfs2 cam is the same as an anderson b4 cam. I will stick to my n/a motors .... You stick to your heavy flywheels
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Unless you have your own cam doctor at your house look else where. I would suggest Bullet Cams....I will be tryin them next.
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 105
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I am running a trickflow stage 2 cam with my supercharged engine pushing 10 - 11 pounds and made 465 at the wheels .Im not an expert but the guy who built my engine suggested this cam and for what everyones calls an off the shelf i think it works great plus i couldnt go with any more power without pushing the limits of my block. just my 2 cents
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MM Fanatic
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,810
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Allright JackAss... I missed the 1.6, not 1.7 was thinking of a different thread. BUT I thought you were the 'cam god', you should know better than that anyway. Boost psi is dependant upon being able to pressurize something. You can't build as much pressure if you have a valve open, so to speak. Same reason the psi of your blower on a 302 is less on a 347. Your motor is taking more air away per intake stroke leaving you with less pressure built up before the next opening. And if you don't believe this, and I Quote:
"Because of the negative effects of overlap on a supercharger car's performance, and especially in the case of high exhaust back pressure as is the case with most factory supercharged cars, we find that the optimal cam duration for the intake cam is typically 30-40* of duration less than a normally aspirated camshaft for the same peak power RPM. The decision to reduce the intake cam duration rather than split the duration reduction between the intake and exhaust cams, is that the intake cam will flow air under pressurized conditions (due to the addition of the supercharger and the increase in intake manifold pressure) and so at a reduced intake cam duration the engine will still be able to get it's full share of intake air. At the same time, the high rpm efficiency improvement from the reduction of overlap will also boost power production with a more conservative cam. Finally, if we would like to get more flow from the intake cam, there is still the option of using a higher lift camshaft (with a steeper profile due to the decreased duration) with supporting valve train modifications to make sure valve float doesn't occur at higher rpms." CHEW ON THAT
__________________
A whole bunch of crap that makes the car go fast |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,387
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Don't have much more to add then waht's been said already. THe combo looks good
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
"Not to mention that 4 degrees is a .050... and the cam is 542/563 which will inflate that 4 degree number, now won't it... mister cam expert..."
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Enthusiast
|
i think both of you will need new key boards!! calm down yall
__________________
1988 vert - still in progress 2004 F250 |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
MM Fanatic
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,810
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I wasn't thinking correctly... I was thinking @ .500 not .050 Was having a brain fart. And I DON'T lie, shithead. I seriously thought that this guy had 1.7's inflating the duration. I don't claim to be a cam expert by any means, like you do. But I do know that this is NOT the best cam for a boosted application, or any overlapping cam. SO PISS OFF
__________________
A whole bunch of crap that makes the car go fast |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: My Engine combo, and future upgrades, Help!!!
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| engine combo | AJSTANG | 5.0 Mustangs | 49 | September 9th, 2008 12:28 AM |
| future upgrades | 68351w | 2005 - 2010 | 20 | August 29th, 2008 01:29 AM |
| 306 Engine Combo? | 92lx5oh | 5.0 Mustangs | 23 | April 9th, 2007 12:09 AM |
| Possible Upgrades in My Future.. need Opinions and Expertise | whtpny | General Tech | 13 | April 3rd, 2007 11:16 AM |
| future upgrades | serioussaint | V6 Mustangs | 1 | October 19th, 2006 12:27 AM |