Expected gains from a GT40 intake on an otherwise stock motor - Page 2
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old February 23rd, 2010, 03:56 PM   #21
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,392
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quick question. How do you get an exact measurement of an engines VE?
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old February 23rd, 2010, 04:34 PM   #22
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,233
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
Quick question. How do you get an exact measurement of an engines VE?
Well, your mass air sensor knows how much air is being pulled through the intake. That gives you actual air consumed.
Take the half of the displacement of the motor multiplied by the rpm to see what "ideal" consumption would be.
Actual air consumed divided by ideal consumption gives you the VE.
EDIT: I realize this doesn't take the mass of fuel into account, so the above won't be "exact". You can use the fuel map to see exactly how much fuel is added per the air consumed, rpm, and throttle position. That'll most likely involve some conversions from cubic feet of air to pounds of air, as most domestic injectors are rated by pounds of fuel.


For example, if you ignore fuel, as it makes life easier:

A 5.0 turning 4500 rpm theroetically should consume 2.5L*4500rpm, or 11,250 Liters of air/fuel mixture per minute (that's 397 cubic feet for you non-metric types). If the mass air sensor is is showing consumption of 369cfm, 369/397 = .93, or 93%.
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\


Buy my Bronco, special deal for MM folks

Last edited by ReverendDexter; February 23rd, 2010 at 04:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 23rd, 2010, 05:12 PM   #23
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,627
ryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by MustangMatt96GT View Post
yes i will agree... im just saying from my experience that is a HUGE $$$$ motor.... but it is hard to get a 100% VE motor NA cheap, and pretty easy to do when you are compressing air before hand.

Actually Ford claims their new 32v 5.0L motor operates at 110% VE at peak torque. Making 400+ hp from 300ish cubes in an emissions street motor is pretty impressive, but not crazy expensive.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out.
03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it
04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it
89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it

  Reply With Quote
Old February 23rd, 2010, 07:08 PM   #24
Proud American
 
MustangMatt96GT's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
10.76 @ 122 with d/a of 8365 ft
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 10,171
MustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to beholdMustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to beholdMustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to beholdMustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to beholdMustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to beholdMustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to beholdMustangMatt96GT is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 3 reviews
Send a message via AIM to MustangMatt96GT
Default

Originally Posted by ryans88gt View Post
Actually Ford claims their new 32v 5.0L motor operates at 110% VE at peak torque. Making 400+ hp from 300ish cubes in an emissions street motor is pretty impressive, but not crazy expensive.
Thats pretty impressive...
__________________
RIP Travis Billings

Special Thanks to:
Andrews Racing Transmissions
Baseline Suspensions
Blown Small Block Ford with a hole in the block.
9.5 Dart Block 400 CI being saved for.
Just because you can fuck a cactus doesn't mean you should.

Never Lift Racecars
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Expected gains from a GT40 intake on an otherwise stock motor
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intake gains dschack V6 Mustangs 18 January 3rd, 2010 03:44 PM
gains expected from x pipe and high flow cats? Black Sunshine 07 2005 - 2010 13 July 14th, 2008 01:59 PM
rwhp gains expected?? 01sta1k3r 99-04 11 January 30th, 2008 11:39 PM
lower intake gains 02ponypackage V6 Mustangs 67 September 12th, 2007 08:31 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.