How do you chose the right flywheel?
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old August 13th, 2010, 01:11 PM   #1
Regular
 
beamer814's Avatar
 
1990, GT, 5 speed
I Dont Wanna Know :(
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Zion, IL
Posts: 111
beamer814 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

How do you chose the right flywheel?


I looked around a little on-line and I just cant seem to find anything that tells me what kinda flywheel i should run. And I dont mean brand but the weight. Ive seen everything from 9lb flywheels to 35lb flywheels for my car and i was wondering what i should pic up. The more i drive the more i can tell the clutch aint gonna make it through another winter of sliping it so i dont spin the tires in the chicago snow but since i will have trans and out i was wondering what i should throw in there I know the basic principles the lighter it is the faster it revs and the less horse power that is consumebed by the rotation but i wanna go drag racing next summer and i need something that can still make the cheater slicks hook.

P.S.- I will be running 3.73s next spring if that makes a deffrence.

Last edited by beamer814; August 13th, 2010 at 01:14 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old August 13th, 2010, 01:33 PM   #2
Regular
 
HMERacing's Avatar
 
89 FOX/01 WS6
0@0/13.1@106
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 458
HMERacing is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

There is a big difference between because of rotating mass. If it's too light it may rev fast but bog off the line. too big and it is alot of weight to turn and won't rev a fast.
I think the extremely light ones (aluminum) are more for road racing. I think a billet steel would suit you fine. It is heavier and is more suited for drag racing.
__________________
Mike

1989 Mustang LX, 2001 Transam WS6

Originally Posted by 302Army187 View Post
I'm going to install an U pipe.

bitch is going to re route the exhaust pulse back out of the intake between intake pulses.
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 01:35 PM   #3
Banned
 
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

get yours resurfaced for 40 bucks
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE]
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 01:40 PM   #4
Regular
 
HMERacing's Avatar
 
89 FOX/01 WS6
0@0/13.1@106
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 458
HMERacing is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93hatch View Post
get yours resurfaced for 40 bucks
Unless its trashed from him slipping it in Chicago snow.
__________________
Mike

1989 Mustang LX, 2001 Transam WS6

Originally Posted by 302Army187 View Post
I'm going to install an U pipe.

bitch is going to re route the exhaust pulse back out of the intake between intake pulses.
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 02:31 PM   #5
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
93mustank will become famous soon enough93mustank will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by HMERacing View Post
There is a big difference between because of rotating mass. If it's too light it may rev fast but bog off the line. too big and it is alot of weight to turn and won't rev a fast.
I think the extremely light ones (aluminum) are more for road racing. I think a billet steel would suit you fine. It is heavier and is more suited for drag racing.
This is a retarded statement....

Oh no...too light..cars revving too quick..lets stick 20 more lbs on the end of the crank... dont want the car to rev too quick... Oh no 20 lbs still revs too quick..lets take of the light weight aluminum balancer off and put on a heavy steel one...Ahh crap still revs to fast lets weld some metal to the pressure plate... That worked...now my car hooks and runs 13's ...neat
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com

Last edited by 93mustank; August 13th, 2010 at 03:00 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 02:45 PM   #6
Banned
 
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

you need a heavy flywheel to launch at 3k and pull 2.0 60's
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE]
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 03:05 PM   #7
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
ryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93mustank View Post
This is a retarded statement....

Oh no...too light..cars revving too quick..lets stick 20 more lbs on the end of the crank... dont want the car to rev too quick... Oh no 20 lbs still revs too quick..lets take of the light weight aluminum balancer off and put on a heavy steel one...A crap still revs to fast lets weld some metal to the pressure plate... That worked...now my car hooks and runs 13's ...neat
Principles of physics pwn you. all day... everyday.

the mass of the flywheel definitely effects the force available at launch. If your car is not traction limited at launch, going to a lighter flywheel will definitely hurt your times. This has been proven over and over and over at the drag strip.

If you car is traction limited, going to a lighter flywheel will help you as it will allow you to launch higher in the power band and you will put more power down all the way down the track. This also has been proven time and time again.

Anyone can make retarded absolute statements like you... but then they would be ... well... retarded.

Look for an upcoming article on Pete Epple's project shake and bake where they swap out the aluminum flywheel and light metal clutch for heavier units and improve their times significantly due to better 60' times.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out.
03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it
04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it
89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it

  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 03:27 PM   #8
Regular
 
HMERacing's Avatar
 
89 FOX/01 WS6
0@0/13.1@106
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 458
HMERacing is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93mustank View Post
This is a retarded statement....

Oh no...too light..cars revving too quick..lets stick 20 more lbs on the end of the crank... dont want the car to rev too quick... Oh no 20 lbs still revs too quick..lets take of the light weight aluminum balancer off and put on a heavy steel one...Ahh crap still revs to fast lets weld some metal to the pressure plate... That worked...now my car hooks and runs 13's ...neat
WOW, Really?
__________________
Mike

1989 Mustang LX, 2001 Transam WS6

Originally Posted by 302Army187 View Post
I'm going to install an U pipe.

bitch is going to re route the exhaust pulse back out of the intake between intake pulses.
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 04:33 PM   #9
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
93mustank will become famous soon enough93mustank will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Ok ryan do you run heavy flywheels?
So if i go to the track and my car bogs i need to go to a heavy steel flywheel? Hmm.. or maybe i adjust the clutch and fix the real problems... how would i benifit from a heavy flywhhel... why handicap a problem?

My car makes too much power and doesnt hook at the track.. so i put a restrictor plate on it..now it hooks
Originally Posted by ryans88gt View Post
Principles of physics pwn you. all day... everyday.

the mass of the flywheel definitely effects the force available at launch. If your car is not traction limited at launch, going to a lighter flywheel will definitely hurt your times. This has been proven over and over and over at the drag strip.

If you car is traction limited, going to a lighter flywheel will help you as it will allow you to launch higher in the power band and you will put more power down all the way down the track. This also has been proven time and time again.

Anyone can make retarded absolute statements like you... but then they would be ... well... retarded.

Look for an upcoming article on Pete Epple's project shake and bake where they swap out the aluminum flywheel and light metal clutch for heavier units and improve their times significantly due to better 60' times.
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 06:03 PM   #10
Regular
 
beamer814's Avatar
 
1990, GT, 5 speed
I Dont Wanna Know :(
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Zion, IL
Posts: 111
beamer814 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

okay so yes lighter is better but i need the momentum of the flywheel or i will bog thats fact. So i will be running cheater slicks running from 3.73s with aluminum drive shaft and around 300hp lets say ive got good traction and the car is not gonna just spin i will be launching at ? rpm nd so what do you guys run with good success
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 07:39 PM   #11
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
EscortSportage's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT 5.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 2,186
EscortSportage is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93mustank View Post
This is a retarded statement....

Oh no...too light..cars revving too quick..lets stick 20 more lbs on the end of the crank... dont want the car to rev too quick... Oh no 20 lbs still revs too quick..lets take of the light weight aluminum balancer off and put on a heavy steel one...Ahh crap still revs to fast lets weld some metal to the pressure plate... That worked...now my car hooks and runs 13's ...neat

neat ...lMAFO !!!!! i love this guy
__________________
Cage
Maximum Motorsports
Sparco
QH/BE
Nitto
"a huge bad azz motor is nice untill you have to turn or stop"
  Reply With Quote
Old August 13th, 2010, 07:41 PM   #12
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
EscortSportage's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT 5.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 2,186
EscortSportage is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

dude if ur worring about spinning, u obviously have traction problems, to fix this would be suspension mods, chassis stiffness and tires, (weight transfer helps)
__________________
Cage
Maximum Motorsports
Sparco
QH/BE
Nitto
"a huge bad azz motor is nice untill you have to turn or stop"
  Reply With Quote
Old September 3rd, 2010, 11:29 PM   #13
Regular
 
beamer814's Avatar
 
1990, GT, 5 speed
I Dont Wanna Know :(
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Zion, IL
Posts: 111
beamer814 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by EscortSportage View Post
dude if ur worring about spinning, u obviously have traction problems, to fix this would be suspension mods, chassis stiffness and tires, (weight transfer helps)
not worried about it i just know wheel spin is hower ever fun really deafeating the point of trying to drag race
__________________
Arguing with someone on the Internet is like participating in the Special Olympics...Even if you win you are still retarded!
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 02:10 AM   #14
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93mustank View Post
Ok ryan do you run heavy flywheels?
So if i go to the track and my car bogs i need to go to a heavy steel flywheel? Hmm.. or maybe i adjust the clutch and fix the real problems... how would i benifit from a heavy flywhhel... why handicap a problem?

My car makes too much power and doesnt hook at the track.. so i put a restrictor plate on it..now it hooks
if you dumped your clutch at idle, then an alunimum flywheel might help. But being that youll prolly let loose around 5k-up, you will store more energy in the flywheel(same concept as torque), and at the moment of jerk, you will have more energy stored in the flywheel.

aluminum sledge hammers dont work well either.
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 02:25 AM   #15
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
93mustank will become famous soon enough93mustank will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

When does it stop? Then why not run a 90lb flywheel? So run a 351 main because its heavier and run a 30 lb balancer?
Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
if you dumped your clutch at idle, then an alunimum flywheel might help. But being that youll prolly let loose around 5k-up, you will store more energy in the flywheel(same concept as torque), and at the moment of jerk, you will have more energy stored in the flywheel.

aluminum sledge hammers dont work well either.
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 02:46 AM   #16
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93mustank View Post
When does it stop? Then why not run a 90lb flywheel? So run a 351 main because its heavier and run a 30 lb balancer?
would a 1 million hp dragster be faster than a 3500hp one?

Would a 1000lb offensive lineman block better than a 400lb one? or a 50lb lineman? Your grasping...
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 07:00 AM   #17
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
FastStang91Lx's Avatar
 
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
FastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
Would a 1000lb offensive lineman block better than a 400lb one? or a 50lb lineman?
I would have to say yes a 1000 pounder would block better because he would be wider

On a side note though... assuming he could run, or even stand for that matter, his accelaration is gonna suck. I'm guessing the correct answer is going to be different for one guy vs. the next
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 08:06 AM   #18
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by FastStang91Lx View Post
I would have to say yes a 1000 pounder would block better because he would be wider

On a side note though... assuming he could run, or even stand for that matter, his accelaration is gonna suck. I'm guessing the correct answer is going to be different for one guy vs. the next
Said blocker would not even make it on the field.
__________________

Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 11:00 AM   #19
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
ryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 93mustank View Post
When does it stop? Then why not run a 90lb flywheel? So run a 351 main because its heavier and run a 30 lb balancer?

Let's think about your lack of thinking here....using 2 hypothetical examples

Example 1) Say you have 0 reciprocating mass or the lightest rotating assembly possible with a mass approaching 0. You would have no momentum of inertia stored in your reciprocating mass and upon dropping the clutch, your car would not move, but rather just die, since the mass of the car would easily overtake the tiny bit of inertia stored in the rotating assembly. However, if you could successfully get the car moving, you could accelerate quickly since no power is robbed by the rotating assembly.

Example 2) You have a huge reciprocating mass that approaches infinity (1 million pound flywheel). The moment of inertia is enormous in comparison to the car. The car could never hook that much power at launch and acceleration after launch would approach zero since the engine would struggle to accelerate the rotating mass (i.e. all power is robbed).

What these 2 examples should clearly tell you is that both extremes result in failure. Fix the problem? The problem isn't clutch engagement, the problem is having a proper amount of stored inertia at launch such that you car doesn't bog (example 1) or spin but be excessively slowed by rotating mass (example 2). If you are in the correct range this can be adjusted with launch rpm. If you have too light or too heavy of a flywheel you can never fix the problem with adjusting how hard the clutch hits. There is an optimum flywheel mass. You just fail to think.


To answer you what I have used. I used a steel flywheel. I switched to an aluminum one. I had to increase my launch rpms to get the same 60 foot. My MPH was not effected by the swap. So was this a good swap? Doesn't really make a difference other than I now have to launch the car at a higher rpm. I do like the replaceable flywheel surface however.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out.
03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it
04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it
89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it


Last edited by ryans88gt; September 4th, 2010 at 11:04 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2010, 11:13 AM   #20
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
ryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura aboutryans88gt has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I can tell you that one of the most popular mods to 03/04 cobras is swapping out the aluminum flywheel for a heavy steel one to help them get off the line better.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out.
03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it
04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it
89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: How do you chose the right flywheel?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which block would you chose? Reckless1 Modular Mustangs 9 April 9th, 2010 12:40 AM
Flywheel? Rico-mofos 99-04 7 October 29th, 2008 05:57 PM
Flywheel bbrewer03 96-98 6 August 18th, 2007 09:47 PM
what kit schould i chose 95 mustangmiz Visual 12 March 13th, 2007 10:59 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.