| ![]() | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
5.0 Stock Bottom End Strength
Hey guys, I was just curious if anyone knows how much the stock rotating assembly and block of a 5.0 can handle. I think I remember over 400rwhp is pushing it. What about rpm's? I have heard anything over 6,500 rpm's is too much strain on the motor. What do you think?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
04 Stang 1.0Gallon V6
14.45 @95.8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,265
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
are you talkin about a new 5.0..?
__________________
2004 Bolt on & Cammed 3.9L V6 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM Fanatic
1990 LX hatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
big torque, or big rpm, or any combo of the two. I've seen a 270hp motor split, and have heard of people getting up to 700, im sure it all depends on the condition of the motor.
__________________
![]() Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I was refering to the fox body 5.0's. I was curious on the potential of the stock assembly w/o anything forged steel or modified.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
ANGRY HILLBILLY
1969 Mustang Mach 1
SBF > LSx
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 10,160
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Something was terribly wrong with a motor that split at 270hp.
__________________
![]() ^ .... ^ Me - LS1 driver
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Cobra
11.4 @ 129 - Need cage
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 2,115
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
500 RWHP max.
__________________
![]() NEW NUMBERS: 609/543 |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
What about a max rpm that can be acheived safely w/o engine damage? Or simply put, what would be over-spinning it?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Depends...not a set number...
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
|
this may not be true, but i read that the engine can spin up to 6k safely, but the stock valves will start to float around 5k due to the weak factory springs. any truth to that?
__________________
'02 Mustang GTm Convertible - N/A Almost Cammed Daily - 13.55 @ 100.7 1.955 60' '88 Mustang GTm - 1/4 Mile Build - 750rwhp Project '97 Saturn SL2m - Ex-Nitrous Build - Back-Up Daily |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Not over-spinning it for hp or shift points, rather the highest rpm that can be acheived w/o causing damage or running a heavy risk of destroying a motor all together. Kind of like a "DO NOT GO PAST THIS ENGINE SPEED" rule of thumb. I know the Ford Racing X and Z cams make power up to 6,500 rpm's. Is that a bit too much for the stock rotating assembly? Again, I am just curious on how much these little shortblocks can handle.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6,990
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Bad balance???
This is the most true statement... Every motor is different. I could say 500, but you could easily break at 4. I repeat... EVERY MOTOR IS DIFFERENT. The balance has a lot to do with it too.
__________________
FastStang's Ongoing projects thread Click here! |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yeah, I agree. I know balance of the crank and condition of the engine play large roles in engine durability when racing. Still, if you had lets say, H/C/I on a well balanced motor that was running optimal with a strong valvetrain, would it be safe to take the stock bottom end components to 6,500 if the motor made peak power there? When is it a good time to upgrade the crank, rods, and pistons?
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1989 LX coupe 5.0L
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 496
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i beat on mine all day and its still going. first time ever to the track and i ran a best of 12.4 out of 3 passes and i make 296 to the wheels. ive also seen the tac go well above 6. mind you i dont care if this engine takes a shit
__________________
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6,990
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Stock rev limiter is 6250 rpms, so you don't have too much worry there. The only way to rectify that is with a chip removing it. Stock tachs are not accurate at all. I hit 6250 in my car when the tach says 7.
__________________
FastStang's Ongoing projects thread Click here! |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yeah, I hear ya'. The stock tach. has a mind of it's own. Sometimes I have actually seen my needle hesitate when downshifting. So, does every fox body 5.0 have a built in rev limiter at 6,250? I have a MSD 6AL w/a 6,200 pill, so I have never seen it go off.
Last edited by CokerGT; August 25th, 2010 at 08:42 PM. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Every EFI fox does. At 6250, the computer pulls fuel.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
1989 LX coupe 5.0L
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 496
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
not going by the stock tach and the limiter is gone
__________________
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Enthusiast
1996 Cobra
Not fast enough.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Jose..408!
Posts: 778
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
Mods: Full 01 Cobra drivetrain (Teksid block ) T56, 3.73s, Pro 5.0, Aluminum driveshaft, JLT CAI, BBK O/R X, SLP LM1s, Full welded in sub frame connectors
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
1989 LX coupe 5.0L
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 496
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i have an aftermarket tac and have spun it abouve but its not making and power
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/5-0-mustangs/180648-5-0-stock-bottom-end-strength.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Thread 5.0 Stock Bottom End Strength | Forums at Modded Mustangs | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | November 10th, 2010 11:47 PM | |
Threads Similar to: 5.0 Stock Bottom End Strength
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Strength of Stock rear end w/ 3.73s | MyGT | 99-04 | 17 | November 4th, 2008 05:17 PM |
| 05+ vs 96-04 bottom end strength ? | Quicktime_GT | Modular Mustangs | 7 | December 26th, 2007 03:51 AM |
| How Much HP On Stock Bottom End | 5litercobra | 2.3 Mustangs | 5 | November 13th, 2007 02:55 PM |
| 12s with stock bottom end? | 95wip | 94-95 | 8 | April 16th, 2007 11:10 PM |
| How Much HP Can Stock GT Bottom End Take? | Clutchmaster | 99-04 | 14 | March 22nd, 2007 03:58 PM |