got back from the dyno

b-on-b 5.0 · November 17th, 2010, 09:07 PM

car dynoed 563.6rwhp and 550.5 rwtq at 5,500 rpms @9.5 psi then ran out of fuel....reline of the motor is 6,500-6,800 rpms so it gives me roughly 1,000rpms to 1,300rpms to play with till redline and idk how much more boost..should be in the 600,s by 6,500rpms

ryanw · November 17th, 2010, 09:10 PM

Thats nice. what do you think your HP is at the fly wheel 620 or so?

69fastback · November 17th, 2010, 09:11 PM

Nice numbers. What block do you have?

FastStang91Lx · November 17th, 2010, 09:52 PM

Corrected?

302Army187 · November 18th, 2010, 12:36 AM

i REALLY hope its not the stock block.

even corrected numbers still has you at that risk zone for a oem block.

sick numbers though, more then I expected with that boost level.

orangestang42 · November 18th, 2010, 08:54 AM

incredible numbers, just shows me why i love mustangs...

'11BlackWidow · November 18th, 2010, 09:10 AM

Great number man. Gota love a high Hp Fox body

b-on-b 5.0 · November 18th, 2010, 09:11 AM

no corrected to my elevation of 5,800ft above sea level the numbers were ike 457rwhp up here but like i said by redline should be close to 600rwhp or over for sae numbers and corrected would be about 500rwhp for my elevation

nolife · November 18th, 2010, 10:54 AM

Originally Posted by b-on-b 5.0

no corrected to my elevation of 5,800ft above sea level the numbers were ike 457rwhp up here but like i said by redline should be close to 600rwhp or over for sae numbers and corrected would be about 500rwhp for my elevation

I don't know what equations you are using for correction and not that a final number really matters to anyone anyway but for your planning purposes... As your boost goes up, the value of the correction factor that needs to be applied for a realistic output power estimate for the elevation difference goes down. Meaning.. The higher the boost the lower the effect of altitude. The ratio of pressure difference goes down, that is the reason why using boost in higher altitudes is so popular.

Trick Tuners · November 18th, 2010, 10:59 AM

Nice numbers!

93hatch · November 18th, 2010, 11:02 AM

I lawl at corrected numbers. Your car makes 457. Be happy you dont need to tell people it makes 600

WhiteMamba · November 18th, 2010, 11:27 AM

what did it run at the track? what is your trap speed?

302Army187 · November 18th, 2010, 01:46 PM

Originally Posted by nolife

I don't know what equations you are using for correction and not that a final number really matters to anyone anyway but for your planning purposes... As your boost goes up, the value of the correction factor that needs to be applied for a realistic output power estimate for the elevation difference goes down. Meaning.. The higher the boost the lower the effect of altitude. The ratio of pressure difference goes down, that is the reason why using boost in higher altitudes is so popular.

+1

I estimate a N/A car loses 18-19% HP from our elevation. a boosted car probably only loses half of that, and at higher boost levels a 1/4.

I would guess 560whp with 9.5% loss for elevation puts you around 510-520whp. but my figures are probably way off.

I know my n/a numbers are good, but for boost im not sure.

93hatch · November 18th, 2010, 02:44 PM

jesus horse on emu porn christ that made me lol

b-on-b 5.0 · November 18th, 2010, 08:30 PM

yea no i was just posting the sea level numbers cuz half the people around here dont understand that elevation affects hp and go off what sea level numbers are sothats what i posted and when u go to a dyno up here all they give u is the sae numbers so easy dont freak 93hatch

and track times idk yet still waiting for it to open

the 600 number is a guestamiate for SEA LEVEL (sae numbers) when i can get fuel and take the motor past 5,500 rpms

November 17th, 2010, 09:07 PM	#1
b-on-b 5.0 Regular 1993 Mustang 5.0 LX 11.45@122.34 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Lakewood, CO Posts: 344 iTrader: 0 reviews	got back from the dyno car dynoed 563.6rwhp and 550.5 rwtq at 5,500 rpms @9.5 psi then ran out of fuel....reline of the motor is 6,500-6,800 rpms so it gives me roughly 1,000rpms to 1,300rpms to play with till redline and idk how much more boost..should be in the 600,s by 6,500rpms __________________ Old setup 93 cobra motor, supporting mods, 11.5psi out of V3 S-Trim made 422.5rwhp and 450 rwtq ran 12's at 5800 ft above sealevel new setup 347 on 11psi made 616.9rwhp and 576.0rwtq

November 17th, 2010, 09:10 PM	#2
ryanw I Post Entirely Way Too Much 1991 Ford Mustang GT Join Date: May 2007 Location: San Diego, California Posts: 6,063 iTrader: 0 reviews	Thats nice. what do you think your HP is at the fly wheel 620 or so? __________________ DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears

November 17th, 2010, 09:11 PM	#3
69fastback Premium Member 1969 Mustang Mach 1 6.824@101.61 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving Posts: 5,565 iTrader: 0 reviews	Nice numbers. What block do you have? __________________ ./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ \|___\| ......... \|___\| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player

November 17th, 2010, 09:52 PM	#4
FastStang91Lx I Post Entirely Way Too Much 1991 Mustang LX 5.0 Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Minnesota Posts: 5,572 iTrader: 2 reviews	Corrected? __________________ Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184

November 18th, 2010, 12:36 AM	#5
302Army187 Hardcore Enthusiast '89 LX 'Vert 10's or bust... Literally. Join Date: May 2009 Location: Denver, Co Posts: 2,915 iTrader: 0 reviews	i REALLY hope its not the stock block. even corrected numbers still has you at that risk zone for a oem block. sick numbers though, more then I expected with that boost level. __________________ H/C/I 302 + nitrous for now... supercharger/turbo soon? www.youtube.com/Xarmy187 Please support my YouTube channel! My videos don't disappoint!

November 18th, 2010, 08:54 AM	#6
orangestang42 Enthusiast 1995 Mustang GT Join Date: May 2010 Location: Port Charlotte, Florida Posts: 816 iTrader: 0 reviews	incredible numbers, just shows me why i love mustangs...

November 18th, 2010, 09:10 AM	#7
'11BlackWidow Enthusiast 2011 Mustang GT C/S Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Temple Terrace, FL Posts: 522 iTrader: 0 reviews	Great number man. Gota love a high Hp Fox body __________________ TAMPA BAY AREA CREW MILITARY CREW Black Stang Crew 2011 Mustang GT/CS: Blk on Blk Bassani Lng Tube Hdrs w/ High Flow Cats & 3" Stnls Catback Exhst, JLT Carbon Fiber CAI, SCT Tuner w/ BAMA Tune, Boss 302 Frnt Splitter, Smoked Tail & Side Mrkr Lghts

November 18th, 2010, 09:11 AM	#8
b-on-b 5.0 Regular 1993 Mustang 5.0 LX 11.45@122.34 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Lakewood, CO Posts: 344 iTrader: 0 reviews	no corrected to my elevation of 5,800ft above sea level the numbers were ike 457rwhp up here but like i said by redline should be close to 600rwhp or over for sae numbers and corrected would be about 500rwhp for my elevation __________________ Old setup 93 cobra motor, supporting mods, 11.5psi out of V3 S-Trim made 422.5rwhp and 450 rwtq ran 12's at 5800 ft above sealevel new setup 347 on 11psi made 616.9rwhp and 576.0rwtq

November 18th, 2010, 10:59 AM	#10
Trick Tuners MM Fanatic KB'd GT Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: San Diego Posts: 4,467 iTrader: 3 reviews	Nice numbers! __________________ Check out my forums for stuff on troubleshooting, tuning, etc We teamed up with Socal Performance Racing to bring dyno tuning to San Diego. Be friends with us on FB

November 18th, 2010, 11:02 AM	#11
93hatch Banned 1992 Lx 11.39@119.24 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Az Posts: 11,644 iTrader: 0 reviews	I lawl at corrected numbers. Your car makes 457. Be happy you dont need to tell people it makes 600 __________________ [QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE]

November 18th, 2010, 11:27 AM	#12
WhiteMamba Regular 88 Notch Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Saint Charles IL Posts: 431 iTrader: 0 reviews	what did it run at the track? what is your trap speed? __________________ 88 Notchy 306 with 70mm Turbo 510 RWHP on 10lbs K thnx Can we chat?

November 18th, 2010, 02:44 PM	#14
93hatch Banned 1992 Lx 11.39@119.24 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Az Posts: 11,644 iTrader: 0 reviews	jesus horse on emu porn christ that made me lol __________________ [QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE]

November 18th, 2010, 08:30 PM	#15
b-on-b 5.0 Regular 1993 Mustang 5.0 LX 11.45@122.34 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Lakewood, CO Posts: 344 iTrader: 0 reviews	yea no i was just posting the sea level numbers cuz half the people around here dont understand that elevation affects hp and go off what sea level numbers are sothats what i posted and when u go to a dyno up here all they give u is the sae numbers so easy dont freak 93hatch and track times idk yet still waiting for it to open the 600 number is a guestamiate for SEA LEVEL (sae numbers) when i can get fuel and take the motor past 5,500 rpms __________________ Old setup 93 cobra motor, supporting mods, 11.5psi out of V3 S-Trim made 422.5rwhp and 450 rwtq ran 12's at 5800 ft above sealevel new setup 347 on 11psi made 616.9rwhp and 576.0rwtq

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

Threads Similar to: got back from the dyno
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Just got back from the dyno	b-on-b 5.0	5.0 Mustangs	10	May 11th, 2010 05:04 AM
Got back from dyno	Jaygt	99-04	12	April 14th, 2010 08:56 PM
just came back from the dyno	unblock	99-04	61	November 24th, 2009 01:55 AM
back from the dyno....	MineralGreyGT	99-04	12	April 27th, 2008 11:31 PM
Back From The Dyno	mdvaldosta	99-04	15	February 16th, 2007 11:56 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.