| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
1990 mustang lx
?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: bay area
Posts: 26
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
intake manifolds bang for buck
I have 90 lx 5.0 5spd with 106k miles. i have a bbk cold air intake im not sure what kind of upper n lower intake manifold. these are the parts im settting up to buy
e303 cam 1.7 roller rocker arms 24lb injectors mass air flow shorty headers h-pipe no cats flowmasters 2 chamber 130 amp alternator 327 gears im just not sure if the ford cobra intake would work. any thoughts? |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Don't buy that e-cam please. Everyone makes the same mistake...Learn from someone who has a letter cam (me)..Wait until you get cylinder heads to get your cam. As far as bang for your buck intake, get an explorer intake. Take some sandpaper, and clean up the inside of it. Done
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street I pray for traction I can keep But if I spin, and begin to slide Please dear God, protect my ride |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Explorer since it's the same as the cobra, and don't put 24's in it until you need them... and you won't with that. Skip the E cam, not a bad cam, but there is much better unless you have to because of emissions. Don't forget a bigger throttlebody. 65mm would be just fine for that setup. And my only question is why only 3.27's? Do you drive 50 or more miles a day at 75-80mph? If you are an auto, I would do a 3.73 minimum and 3.55's with a manual.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
1990 mustang lx
?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: bay area
Posts: 26
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i thought a e cam was the best way to go. explorer intake? that a brand? or the suv
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
1990 mustang lx
?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: bay area
Posts: 26
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i like the 3.27s cause im still good on the freeway. i like to drive so i dont wont the car to be working all that hard. and i have the stock 5spd. i still wnna be able too keep my high end on the freeway also
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
You'll be fine with 3.55's too, and it'll give you just a little more kick too. I currently have 3.55's and a 5 speed, and I'm switching to 3.73's cuz I have another rear with them in it. I drive alot, and the mileage with the 3.55's isn't bad at all. And explorer the suv, yes. Any one with the 5.0 in it. It's a cheap upgrade over stock. The heads on them are better too, for cheap, just a little fyi. The E cam is only the best way to go if you HAVE to pass emissions. But many people claim to pass with the TrickFlow Stage 1 cam.
Don't take this the wrong way by any means, but just because you didn't know about the explorer intake, I suggest researching A LOT before you buy anything. You'll want to have a gameplan or goal in mind before you start buying parts, or you'll end up buying stuff twice or more. What is your main intent with this car. Just a DD? Some dragstrip? Some autocross? And lastly, what is your budget, or are you just buying things when you can? The answers to those questions will help you on your quest for affordable, reliable power.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Newbie
1990 mustang lx
?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: bay area
Posts: 26
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ok all good. thats why im on here to get some info. my first mustang but i want to make him hot. so i will be buying stuff along the way when i can. but i do want to run hard n strong street and freeway.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
That sounded really gay....
![]() im just joking bro.... lol
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I have no issues with the 3.55's at all, I would consider them a good all around gear. I'm jumping to the 3.73's mainly because 1. I have them, and 2. I'm gonna start hitting the track next season. You won't notice a huge difference over your 3.27's, but if you can do it yourself or get it done cheap, I'd do it in a heartbeat. It would probably feel like you added another 15-20 horse.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: intake manifolds bang for buck
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bang for my buck?? | TrueBlue756 | 2005 - 2010 | 27 | September 21st, 2010 01:23 PM |
| best bang for your buck | njstang | 99-04 | 37 | August 30th, 2008 02:50 PM |
| Bang for your buck | blackmustang285 | 2005 - 2010 | 22 | August 30th, 2007 10:40 AM |
| Bang for your buck value | WilltheThrill | 99-04 | 90 | February 2nd, 2007 01:40 PM |
| best bang for buck | PONYBOY14 | 96-98 | 0 | January 26th, 2007 12:57 AM |