I Need Cam education
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
View Poll Results: Which cam do you like best
E303 2 22.22%
B303 5 55.56%
F303 2 22.22%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 30th, 2011, 12:55 PM   #1
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I Need Cam education


Need educated on the pros and cons of the E303, B303, and F303 cams for a 1989 5.0 mustang.

Thanks
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old January 30th, 2011, 04:18 PM   #2
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
ryanw's Avatar
 
1991 Ford Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
ryanw has a spectacular aura aboutryanw has a spectacular aura aboutryanw has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

do you have to pass smog in your area ? The reason i ask is some of those cams you listed are not smog legal
__________________

DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads,
Trick Flow R intake,
Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors,
jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe
flowmaster super 10 mufflers,
255 fuel pump,
3:27 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 04:30 PM   #3
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Yep, they check or do whatever testing they have to do for smog.
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:05 PM   #4
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
FastStang91Lx's Avatar
 
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
FastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Than you are stuck with the 'E'. Some people say that they have passed emissions with the TF Stage 1, but I couldn't verify that. I would also imagine that if you ordered a custom one, it could be ground to pass as well.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:10 PM   #5
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by FastStang91Lx View Post
Than you are stuck with the 'E'. Some people say that they have passed emissions with the TF Stage 1, but I couldn't verify that. I would also imagine that if you ordered a custom one, it could be ground to pass as well.
I like the sound of the B cam. which one give you the most power? and i'm not suprized that I would be stuck with one option
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:16 PM   #6
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
FastStang91Lx's Avatar
 
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
FastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Couldn't tell ya if one is more powerful than the next. They are all junk. I've had an E and my buddy had an F. Not impressive in comparison to just about any other OTS cam.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:17 PM   #7
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
FastStang91Lx's Avatar
 
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
FastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

I really wish you had a 'none' on your poll, cuz I can't vote for any of those listed, but I'm curious as to how many people voted them to be good.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:18 PM   #8
Banned
 
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of93hatch has much to be proud of
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Lolll I remember sean passing the sniffer with my 347 p heads tfs2 smog legal cam lol lol lol lol
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE]
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:25 PM   #9
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
FastStang91Lx's Avatar
 
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
FastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Really? That's awesome.... Lucky I don't have to worry up here, but good to know!
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 05:27 PM   #10
Big timin' in a small town
 
Drick's Avatar
 
2004 FX4 F150, 86 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gods country. Nordern Michigan eh
Posts: 14,336
Drick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Drick Send a message via MSN to Drick
Default

Yeah im glad I live in a state where there is no emmisons! WOOT

Anyway. I cannot vote. Its like voting in the 2008 president elections all over again
__________________


FX4 Crew
Crew member #1

Don't take anything I say to heart, I don't try to come off as an asshole. It just happens
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 06:21 PM   #11
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

LMAO that sucks. They are really that bad? I want that cool loabing sound. I know that may sound amature or whatever but it sounds cool to me.

So what cam would be good then? what about cams from voodoo or whatever they are called. I see their add in my 5.0 and muscle mustangs magz.
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 06:25 PM   #12
Big timin' in a small town
 
Drick's Avatar
 
2004 FX4 F150, 86 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gods country. Nordern Michigan eh
Posts: 14,336
Drick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Drick Send a message via MSN to Drick
Default

Whatever you want. But for the same money or a tad more you can get a great cam that will have good sound and a power increase. The Ford cams are way outdated and are worth their money in scrap steal if you ask me.

Trick Flow stage 1 is a good one and Faststang said he'd sell you his for 130. You could also go with a Trick Flow stage 2.

If your running a stock top end then there is no reason to have a huge lift or anything. Just get something under .5 lift.

A crower 15511 is nice too. Ive heard nothing but good things on that when i've looked around at cams
__________________


FX4 Crew
Crew member #1

Don't take anything I say to heart, I don't try to come off as an asshole. It just happens
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 06:29 PM   #13
Big timin' in a small town
 
Drick's Avatar
 
2004 FX4 F150, 86 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gods country. Nordern Michigan eh
Posts: 14,336
Drick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Drick Send a message via MSN to Drick
Default

Crower 15511 - Crower Performance Level 2 Camshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com

theres the crower

Heres a couple Trick Flows.

Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51402000 - Trick Flow® Track Max® Hydraulic Roller Camshafts for Ford 5.0L - Overview - SummitRacing.com

^thats probably the one faststang is selling

And then a stage 2. But IMO if your on a stock top end with only a cam then you dont need a lift anywhere over .5
Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51402001 - Trick Flow® Track Max® Hydraulic Roller Camshafts for Ford 5.0L - Overview - SummitRacing.com


Personally out of the three I just posted, I would go with the TF stage 1. And just buy it from faststang to save some cash. Its a great cam and 100x better than any of those letter cams.

But if you want to do your own looking, then go with something in the area of a .460-.490 lift. With a moderate amount of duration. Not a huge amount.

That F cam you posted up there is completely ridiculous for a stock top end anyway lol. You'd barely even be able to flow enough air to make it to where that cam makes power.
__________________


FX4 Crew
Crew member #1

Don't take anything I say to heart, I don't try to come off as an asshole. It just happens
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 06:53 PM   #14
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Drick View Post
Crower 15511 - Crower Performance Level 2 Camshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com

theres the crower

Heres a couple Trick Flows.

Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51402000 - Trick Flow® Track Max® Hydraulic Roller Camshafts for Ford 5.0L - Overview - SummitRacing.com

^thats probably the one faststang is selling

And then a stage 2. But IMO if your on a stock top end with only a cam then you dont need a lift anywhere over .5
Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51402001 - Trick Flow® Track Max® Hydraulic Roller Camshafts for Ford 5.0L - Overview - SummitRacing.com


Personally out of the three I just posted, I would go with the TF stage 1. And just buy it from faststang to save some cash. Its a great cam and 100x better than any of those letter cams.

But if you want to do your own looking, then go with something in the area of a .460-.490 lift. With a moderate amount of duration. Not a huge amount.

That F cam you posted up there is completely ridiculous for a stock top end anyway lol. You'd barely even be able to flow enough air to make it to where that cam makes power.
Alittle later on down the road i'm thinking of putting GT40P heads with 1.7 RR

The heads an intake and all that mess will mostlikely come before the cam.

so lets say I have the GT40P heads. and i'm kinda thinkin about one of those elbow intakes instead of the big stock looking types of upper intakes.
sorry i am all over the place it's my ADHD and whatever size injectors and MAF and TB.
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 06:55 PM   #15
Newbie
 
OmniEquipped's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 35
OmniEquipped is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

If lope is what you're after, it comes from duration as opposed to lift. The B cam is higher duration; the E is higher lift. I'm running an E right now. It's probably not as good as some of the new stuff (I built mine 10 years ago and used the E as somewhat of an experiment because I had never used one) but I wouldn't call it "Junk". I'm moderately happy with it, all things considered. More important than sound, you also need to consider at what RPM you want your power to kick in, this of course determined by what type of driving you're building it for. For a street car, you would probably want low to mid range. For a race car you may want better top-end. My setup is for street and the E really starts kicking at around 3500 rpm. I'm considering a cam swap at some point myself. Since my application is in a truck (a bit heavier than a car) I'd like to find something to help out on low-end.
__________________
My 5.0 - View the vitals here.

  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 07:05 PM   #16
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

This is the intake I think I am interested in.
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 07:10 PM   #17
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by OmniEquipped View Post
If lope is what you're after, it comes from duration as opposed to lift. The B cam is higher duration; the E is higher lift. I'm running an E right now. It's probably not as good as some of the new stuff (I built mine 10 years ago and used the E as somewhat of an experiment because I had never used one) but I wouldn't call it "Junk". I'm moderately happy with it, all things considered. More important than sound, you also need to consider at what RPM you want your power to kick in, this of course determined by what type of driving you're building it for. For a street car, you would probably want low to mid range. For a race car you may want better top-end. My setup is for street and the E really starts kicking at around 3500 rpm. I'm considering a cam swap at some point myself. Since my application is in a truck (a bit heavier than a car) I'd like to find something to help out on low-end.
My driving will be agressive street driving, but I want it to be fun to drive.
I would want the power to kick in around 2500-3000rpm.
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 07:19 PM   #18
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
FastStang91Lx's Avatar
 
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
FastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the roughFastStang91Lx is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

I'm running the stage 2 cam now, since I've got TF 185 heads. It's a great cam for me, but I can't imagine that it would do anything worth a crap on a stock headed car. The next motor will get a custom Bullet cam, but this one wasn't even close to a complete combo since I was, and still am, changing things as I go. The trickflow cams are nice, but they too aren't the end all be all. But with that being said, the Stage 1 is really more up your alley with what you have now, and what heads (gt40) that you plan on going with in the future. And as far as the elbow intake... That's not what you're looking for in a 'aggressive' street application, lol. Plus, you'll have more money wrapped up in that then a traditional intake.

Edit: just looked at that Crower... That would be a good cam as well.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 07:26 PM   #19
Big timin' in a small town
 
Drick's Avatar
 
2004 FX4 F150, 86 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Gods country. Nordern Michigan eh
Posts: 14,336
Drick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud ofDrick has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Drick Send a message via MSN to Drick
Default

That Crower is what I was going to get in my setup. But after more research im sticking with the sstock 86 cam. I guess its actually pretty aggresive compared to later years and with new heads and intake it will really open up
__________________


FX4 Crew
Crew member #1

Don't take anything I say to heart, I don't try to come off as an asshole. It just happens
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2011, 07:59 PM   #20
Regular
 
brimmer555's Avatar
 
1989 Mustang GT
Tell ya next year
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 437
brimmer555 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by FastStang91Lx View Post
I'm running the stage 2 cam now, since I've got TF 185 heads. It's a great cam for me, but I can't imagine that it would do anything worth a crap on a stock headed car. The next motor will get a custom Bullet cam, but this one wasn't even close to a complete combo since I was, and still am, changing things as I go. The trickflow cams are nice, but they too aren't the end all be all. But with that being said, the Stage 1 is really more up your alley with what you have now, and what heads (gt40) that you plan on going with in the future. And as far as the elbow intake... That's not what you're looking for in a 'aggressive' street application, lol. Plus, you'll have more money wrapped up in that then a traditional intake.

Edit: just looked at that Crower... That would be a good cam as well.
Why would the elbow intake cost more, and not be a good aggressive intake? i've seen them on a few really nasty fast mustangs in the Magz.
__________________
89 GT RESTO-MOD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWjkD...feature=colike
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: I Need Cam education
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I Need Cam education brimmer555 5.0 Mustangs 5 January 30th, 2011 02:03 PM
Cam education 8A_Honda 5.0 Mustangs 58 August 9th, 2007 10:46 AM
In need of exhaust education Murderjetz General Tech 7 March 18th, 2007 05:39 PM
need some education! JASonic V6 Mustangs 13 March 18th, 2007 02:12 PM
Need Cam education 96mystic 96-98 2 February 23rd, 2007 06:15 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.