Help with a supercharged 302 combo?
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old February 9th, 2011, 03:55 AM   #1
Enthusiast
 
Cloud Nine's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 876
Cloud Nine is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Help with a supercharged 302 combo?


What do you guys think the hp/tq rating and e/t with an average driver would be with this setup;

stock block 302
victor junior heads
track heat intake (chose this because I thought supercharger could take care of higher rpms?)
f303 or e303 cam (i read these work fine with a supercharger?)
vortech v3 sc trim supercharger (5-6psi) Vortech 4FA218-010L - Vortech Centrifugal Supercharger Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com
2.87 pulley swap (unsure about psi after swap? 10-12?)
bypass valve
255 walbro fuel pump
75mm throttle body
76mm c&l maf
42 lb injectors
mild suspension (hotchkis control arms, subframes, radials, shocks)


what would be estimate of the e.t with an average driver and 3000 lb race weight?

Only plan on spinning it too 6000 rpms

Would the stock block handle this power?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old February 9th, 2011, 08:13 AM   #2
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Cloud Nine View Post
What do you guys think the hp/tq rating and e/t with an average driver would be with this setup;

stock block 302
victor junior heads
track heat intake (chose this because I thought supercharger could take care of higher rpms?)
f303 or e303 cam (i read these work fine with a supercharger?)
vortech v3 sc trim supercharger (5-6psi) Vortech 4FA218-010L - Vortech Centrifugal Supercharger Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com
2.87 pulley swap (unsure about psi after swap? 10-12?)
bypass valve
255 walbro fuel pump
75mm throttle body
76mm c&l maf
42 lb injectors
mild suspension (hotchkis control arms, subframes, radials, shocks)


what would be estimate of the e.t with an average driver and 3000 lb race weight?

Only plan on spinning it too 6000 rpms

Would the stock block handle this power?

Thanks
Go with the fcam, I'd make sure you get proper springs for the cam, not just what comes on those heads.

Your going to atleast need to get a good metal bypass valve. Specifically the blue ones vortech sells.

Get a better maf.

2.87 on a 6.87 crank pulley with a heads cam is around 15 psi.

If you do it like that the car should make around 490 to 500 plus. If not then burn it.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2011, 08:20 AM   #3
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Cloud Nine View Post
What do you guys think the hp/tq rating and e/t with an average driver would be with this setup;

stock block 302
victor junior heads
track heat intake (chose this because I thought supercharger could take care of higher rpms?)
f303 or e303 cam (i read these work fine with a supercharger?)
vortech v3 sc trim supercharger (5-6psi) Vortech 4FA218-010L - Vortech Centrifugal Supercharger Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com
2.87 pulley swap (unsure about psi after swap? 10-12?)
bypass valve
255 walbro fuel pump
75mm throttle body
76mm c&l maf
42 lb injectors
mild suspension (hotchkis control arms, subframes, radials, shocks)


what would be estimate of the e.t with an average driver and 3000 lb race weight?

Only plan on spinning it too 6000 rpms

Would the stock block handle this power?

Thanks
Street radials? You are going to need alot more than what you have listed. I would ditch the C&L junk and the F cam and probably use a different intake for sure. A box intake would be my choice. Then you will need either an aftermarket computer or a chip and then you will need a tune. 500+ to the tire with that blower is possible and with any sort of a driver it will go high 10s. With a good driver, low 10s. I know someone with a similar combination that runs 9.90s.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2011, 10:13 AM   #4
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
Street radials? You are going to need alot more than what you have listed. I would ditch the C&L junk and the F cam and probably use a different intake for sure. A box intake would be my choice. Then you will need either an aftermarket computer or a chip and then you will need a tune. 500+ to the tire with that blower is possible and with any sort of a driver it will go high 10s. With a good driver, low 10s. I know someone with a similar combination that runs 9.90s.
Doubt he's going to do that though. The c & l and fcam are junk at the end of the day, but its what he's playing with. Thats a ton of boost for that combo regardless so it's enough to go tens as is with either cam if the car has decent suspension and tire.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2011, 02:56 PM   #5
Enthusiast
 
Cloud Nine's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 876
Cloud Nine is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Woah, Ok I dont want to risk that much on the stock block.

What if I just left the boost at 5-6 psi and no pulley, and switched to a pro m maf.

Would that be around 350-400 hp?

And what springs do you suggest with the vic junior heads?
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 12:08 AM   #6
Enthusiast
 
1987 347 vortech V-2
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
real57vetteguy is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

give it about 8-10 lbs of boost, and correct fuel it will last. I would rather have a box intake for supercharged apps, but the one you have is fine, the alphabet cams arent up to par for alot of applications but they work well with forced induction. You have great heads for what you are doing, but I would change the springs. the stock ones will probably work find as long as you have a stock rev limiter, but double check. I had almost the same setup once with a 331 motor, that made 316 rwhp with 5 lbs of boost, a safe assumption is 17-21 hp per lb of boost, so if you can get a pully to give you about 8-10 you should hit 350. dont be scared of 10 lbs on a stock block. I had a friend running 17 lbs on a 150,000 stockblock and it lived on the drag strip till 200,000
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown!
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 01:31 AM   #7
Enthusiast
 
Cloud Nine's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 876
Cloud Nine is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

What kind of springs do you suggest? Are these good?

Racing Head Service (RHS) 35972-01 - RHS Cylinder Head Parts Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com

We may just end up getting a custom cam.

I don't really want to get a trick flow box intake because I read they have hood clearance issues.

Are there any other box intakes?
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 05:49 AM   #8
MM Fanatic
 
fogged306's Avatar
 
89 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
fogged306 has a spectacular aura aboutfogged306 has a spectacular aura aboutfogged306 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Dont get valve springs until you get the cam. If you want to do it right, you'll want to get springs that match what spring rates the cam calls for.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 08:00 AM   #9
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post
give it about 8-10 lbs of boost, and correct fuel it will last. I would rather have a box intake for supercharged apps, but the one you have is fine, the alphabet cams arent up to par for alot of applications but they work well with forced induction. You have great heads for what you are doing, but I would change the springs. the stock ones will probably work find as long as you have a stock rev limiter, but double check. I had almost the same setup once with a 331 motor, that made 316 rwhp with 5 lbs of boost, a safe assumption is 17-21 hp per lb of boost, so if you can get a pully to give you about 8-10 you should hit 350. dont be scared of 10 lbs on a stock block. I had a friend running 17 lbs on a 150,000 stockblock and it lived on the drag strip till 200,000
Yep, the intake and cam will function in that engine but why do you think your 331 made 316rwhp with boost when most heads/cam/intake 5 liters make 320+rwhp with no boost? The reason for a blower or turbo is to make more power. If you make less power than a naturally aspirated engine then you are doing something wrong....

As for your advice about valve springs, you shouldn't be giving valve train advice. Valve springs are matched to the cam only and have nothing to do with the stock rev limiter or any other rev limiter for that matter. If someone took you advice they could end up with a pile of scrap metal for an engine.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 08:13 AM   #10
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,122
flattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enoughflattusmaximus78 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Yup, valves float when they float. It doesn't matter were your limiter is. I'd still get springs matched to what ever cam you get; fcam or a bcam regardless. Whether it's the final set up the engine sees or not thats part of the process of putting an engine together. When I did my vortech and fcam at the same time it floated so bad. Darrel told me it was valve springs and it was. Jboosty walked me through the rest.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed
--Moates Quarter horse $225--
--Cobra intake $150--
--tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 12:28 PM   #11
MM Fanatic
 
95StangMX's Avatar
 
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

__________________


People should think about boarding up their glass house before starting a rock fight!
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 08:28 PM   #12
Enthusiast
 
Cloud Nine's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 876
Cloud Nine is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Alright I'll be sure to get springs to match my cam.

Do you think if I left that blower at the 5-6 psi it comes with I would be somewhere around 400?

And what are some good box intakes that arent too pricey? I heard the trick flow box intake had hood clearance issues so I don't really want to go with that one.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 09:46 PM   #13
Enthusiast
 
1987 347 vortech V-2
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
real57vetteguy is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

re


Originally Posted by 1slo5.0 View Post
Yep, the intake and cam will function in that engine but why do you think your 331 made 316rwhp with boost when most heads/cam/intake 5 liters make 320+rwhp with no boost? The reason for a blower or turbo is to make more power. If you make less power than a naturally aspirated engine then you are doing something wrong....

As for your advice about valve springs, you shouldn't be giving valve train advice. Valve springs are matched to the cam only and have nothing to do with the stock rev limiter or any other rev limiter for that matter. If someone took you advice they could end up with a pile of scrap metal for an engine.
Why in the world do you think I said I would change the springs, that he needed to double check, as in with the cam manufacturer or consult the head manufacturer about the cam he is using? seems to me we are making the same point . As far as the 331 making 316 rwhp that was before I added the supercharger, I should have made that clear that was my fault, it made 376 on a stock pully making 4 lbsof boost.
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown!
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 09:50 PM   #14
MM Fanatic
 
fogged306's Avatar
 
89 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
fogged306 has a spectacular aura aboutfogged306 has a spectacular aura aboutfogged306 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post
I had almost the same setup once with a 331 motor, that made 316 rwhp with 5 lbs of boost,
Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post
. As far as the 331 making 316 rwhp that was before I added the supercharger, I should have made that clear that was my fault, it made 376 on a stock pully making 4 lbsof boost.
I like turtles
  Reply With Quote
Old February 10th, 2011, 11:18 PM   #15
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post
but I would change the springs. the stock ones will probably work find as long as you have a stock rev limiter, but double check.
This is what I was refering to. You said the stock springs will probably work fine with the stock rev limiter. The rev limiter has nothing to do with what valve springs will work. Nothing at all. Valve float doesn't just occur at high rpm. It occurs at all rpm.


Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post
I had almost the same setup once with a 331 motor, that made 316 rwhp with 5 lbs of boost
Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post
As far as the 331 making 316 rwhp that was before I added the supercharger, I should have made that clear that was my fault, it made 376 on a stock pully making 4 lbsof boost.
I see a contradiction here. Either way, 316rwhp with a 331 tells me this was a poor combination. Most off the shelf heads/cam/intake 302s make 320+rwhp.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old February 11th, 2011, 12:37 AM   #16
Enthusiast
 
Cloud Nine's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 876
Cloud Nine is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

So can anyone help me out with my earlier question. lol
  Reply With Quote
Old February 11th, 2011, 01:21 PM   #17
Enthusiast
 
1987 347 vortech V-2
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 700
real57vetteguy is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Re: Re:


Cloud nine
As for your advice about valve springs, you shouldn't be giving valve train advice. Valve springs are matched to the cam only and have nothing to do with the stock rev limiter or any other rev limiter for that matter. If someone took you advice they could end up with a pile of scrap metal for an engine.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=flattusmaximus78;3512331]Yup, valves float when they float. It doesn't matter were your limiter is. QUOTE]

Wow I am a bit lost as to your one sided way of thinking, alot of head manufacturers will install springs that will operate fine using adequate sized cams, due to the fact that the car is only turning 5250 rpms, if your spring is not properly sized, over reving, or extreme high rpms can cause valve float, and damage to Springs, valvetrain etc. so the fucking rev limiter can prevent valve float in some cases because it keeps the accidental 7200 rpm missed shift from happening. Here is the very Dictionary fucking definition of valve float:
"Valve Float: At very high RPM, an engine condition in which the valve lifters actually float because the valve springs are not strong enough to overcome the momentum of the various valvetrain components. This can be fixed by replacing the springs, but extended periods of valve float will damage the valvetrain beyond repair."

I dont know if this constant valve float you talk about is bacause you stuck some valve springs for a 2.3 liter on a set of trick flows for your 347 but rpms, and rev limiters do have alot to do with valve float!
__________________
And when you lose control you reap the harvest you have sown!
  Reply With Quote
Old February 11th, 2011, 01:46 PM   #18
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by real57vetteguy View Post

Wow I am a bit lost as to your one sided way of thinking, alot of head manufacturers will install springs that will operate fine using adequate sized cams, due to the fact that the car is only turning 5250 rpms, if your spring is not properly sized, over reving, or extreme high rpms can cause valve float, and damage to Springs, valvetrain etc. so the fucking rev limiter can prevent valve float in some cases because it keeps the accidental 7200 rpm missed shift from happening. Here is the very Dictionary fucking definition of valve float:
"Valve Float: At very high RPM, an engine condition in which the valve lifters actually float because the valve springs are not strong enough to overcome the momentum of the various valvetrain components. This can be fixed by replacing the springs, but extended periods of valve float will damage the valvetrain beyond repair."

I dont know if this constant valve float you talk about is bacause you stuck some valve springs for a 2.3 liter on a set of trick flows for your 347 but rpms, and rev limiters do have alot to do with valve float!
You are way off and your tone and chest thumping is making you look like an idiot. Valve float does not just happen at high rpm or peak rpm or past peak rpm. The definition you posted is wrong. Your sarcasm regarding using 2.3 springs on Trick Flow heads further illustrates that you really do not understand how a valvetrain works and you are trying to shadow that with poor sarcasm. No, rev limiters have nothing at all to do with valve float.

I posted one of my own dyno graphs on here a while back that showed severe valve float. You couldn't feel it in the car until about 7200 rpm but the graph shows it was happening alot sooner than that. This was due to a few valve springs being weak.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old February 11th, 2011, 01:47 PM   #19
Enthusiast
 
Cloud Nine's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 876
Cloud Nine is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Well I'm thinking of getting new springs anyway because I'm doing a rebuild anyway.

I'm probably also gonna just leave the blower at 5-6 psi. I think that should leave me kinda safely at 400 rwhp.

What causes the heads to lift? To much boost and too high compression? How do you prevent it?
  Reply With Quote
Old February 11th, 2011, 01:57 PM   #20
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Cloud Nine View Post
Well I'm thinking of getting new springs anyway because I'm doing a rebuild anyway.

I'm probably also gonna just leave the blower at 5-6 psi. I think that should leave me kinda safely at 400 rwhp.

What causes the heads to lift? To much boost and too high compression? How do you prevent it?
With 5-6 psi you won't have to worry about heads lifting. Things that will cause that are high psi with cheap hardware, thin deck surface, warped heads or deck, etc.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Help with a supercharged 302 combo?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best CAI combo StutteringStang06 2005 - 2010 25 September 3rd, 2009 09:45 AM
Need Combo Help 1BADSTANG 5.0 Mustangs 15 March 31st, 2008 12:51 PM
How does this combo run fasta$$306 5.0 Mustangs 2 July 26th, 2007 01:56 AM
What Does My Combo Need? 82GT 5.0 Mustangs 18 November 16th, 2006 07:56 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.