| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Exactly.. Linkbar lifters are a better design to begin with plus you can run any roller cam you would in a roller engine. Not only is the cam core stronger so it will resist flex more, but the lifters don't rely on a thin piece of metal and dogbones to keep them in place, so you can turn more rpm without valvetrain instability.
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Regular
2ndPlaceSetofSteakKnives
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 269
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
03' Cobra | 3.4 Whipple | SRA Swap | 99' SS | Forged 347 | YSI 16psi | 12 Bolt | 96' Cobra | On3 FF Kit | T45 Source Tranny | 3.55's | 91' GT | GT40 Intake | CAI | Headers | www.fquick.com/99Ls1fever |
||
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Factory hydraulic roller lifters are too tall for early blocks and with a standard base circle cam the lifters will be pushed too far out of the lifter bores in a non roller block which will affect oiling to the lifter. The lifter bores in the roller blocks are taller to work with the taller lifters. A standard base circle cam and link bar lifters is the best option.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I was also gonna do this. Good luck man
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Regular
2ndPlaceSetofSteakKnives
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 269
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thanks, We will be starting this build probably next week. I am not sure if we will be ordering the turbo kit first and the cam conversion or just ordering the heads, cam and intake and going from there.
I know that I have been talking to numerous people including the owner of 0n 3 performace and they are a lot of people running stock bottom end with this kit on 6-8 psi. And having no issues. I could for see us running the heads, cam, intake, carb, and turbo kit this season and when the drag season ends tearing the motor down forging it and probably stroking it. Let me know how your build goes. Here is a link to a thread where numerous motor builds are using this turbo kit including stock bottom end cars.
__________________
03' Cobra | 3.4 Whipple | SRA Swap | 99' SS | Forged 347 | YSI 16psi | 12 Bolt | 96' Cobra | On3 FF Kit | T45 Source Tranny | 3.55's | 91' GT | GT40 Intake | CAI | Headers | www.fquick.com/99Ls1fever |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Regular
|
__________________
![]() not built for your taste but built for mine |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Newbie
|
any pointers on swapping out a 5.0 to a 5.8w..
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Starting a 351W Build
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 351W build | texasmustang12 | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | June 8th, 2010 09:23 PM |
| 351w build | drgt97 | 5.0 Mustangs | 3 | March 5th, 2010 05:27 AM |
| need help 351w build... | 88stangGT | 5.0 Mustangs | 9 | May 24th, 2009 08:51 PM |
| 351w build | njstang | 94-95 | 4 | May 18th, 2009 10:23 PM |
| 351W Slowly turning, not starting | Unf6Stang | 5.0 Mustangs | 8 | March 29th, 2009 10:54 PM |