| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
2.4L turbo to 5.0 240sx...got a few questions??
Hi this is my 1st post nice to meet you. Now to business. I am quite familiar with the search function but anything I find relevant is almost 10 years old
. This is just a toy/aka street car. Not looking for a competition car. Now here's my dilemma..I'm in the process of finding a suitable 302 for my 93 240sx. I wanted to just throw a stock 5.0 with a cam mated to a t5 in it. But no. My buddy has me thinking now to rebuild it. The issue is is I have set a $1500 budget because I could rebuild my "4banger" bottom end for 500+whp with that instead. I'd rather not tho I want to try new things. So to rebuild it fresh with rings/bearings/seals is going to be about $900. So what combinations of heads/cams/intake/carb/springs/would you recommend for a 2700lb 4.08 geared 240 and 5-600 left to spend rebuilt? Or don't rebuild it and rely on lady luck but have more for power adders? If you asked me what I would do for an easy 300whp hp on a ka24de I would say, hx35 at 12-16psi(depends on tune), 550cc injectors, romtune, fmic, tial 38mm wg, dsm bov, blablahblah. IDK its 2am and I'm just rambling looking for a little sbf guidance. Flame On idc. Help would be appreciated tho. ![]() p.s. I chose the 302 because A)an absurd amount of after market B)drops right in with explorer mounts and my oe tranny mount C)$$$ they are cheap and everywhere. The only custom items needed are a front sump oil pan cut to fit my xmember and a driveshaft. Last edited by twofortyrida; April 5th, 2011 at 02:44 AM. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Assistant to the Manager
|
Motors gonna be 20 years old..... if you want it to last then a rebuild would be advised.
If you look in the 4v section we have a member who just swapped an integra body on a cobra chasis and engine. Its a nice.read.
__________________
Join The MM Facebook: Modded Mustangs Facebook Vote For Modded Mustangs Ride of the Month Eskimo Brothers To Smooth: Safi, Blitz34, Graystang01, WillTheThrill, Bwal, 101Fng |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 Mustang GT
1991 sliver GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
welcome and we dont mind helping. I came from imports i had a toyota supra MKI with a 2jz swap and a MkII toyota mr2. I cant help to much with the carburetor side because im a efi and stand alone guy. But since your on a budget build, i recommend probe pistons there cheap and good quality and edelbrock heads. But just my advice any one else.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 Mustang GT
1991 sliver GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
you dont rebuild a 302, you get another one out of the junkyard for 400 bucks and slap it in
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 Mustang GT
1991 sliver GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
With all his fab work I dot think he's goin to want to take out and put back.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Does this 1500 include swap parts? My friend and I did an LSx swap into his 96 240 and not including the engine, you're going to spend a LOT more than $1500. IIRC the swap kit from sikky with the headers was more than 2k alone.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
For that budget, leave it stock and put a 100 shot on it. By far the best thing for your money.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
What's unsafe about nitrous?
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
2006 mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 211
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
first of just saying "nitrouse is dangerouse" is retarted. to broad of a statement. just like anything else the nitrouse is only as dangerouse as the user's skill in installing it/using it.
as for as a 302 block, I would suggest looking for 5.0 HO motors from 86-92 1/2. they came from the factory with forged internals and have been know to take a hella beating. you can tell the forged motor by the titanium or 'grey' colored oil pan. 92 1/2 to 93 and up had hyperpyutectic(sp?) pistons however are still very storg. when I had my 92 with the hyper pistons I may of only had bolt-ons, but I did beat the crap out of that motor and it had 212000miles on it when I sold it still running and not burning oil. (bear in mind I am anal about oil changes) as far as your 4 banger options I am well aware of how much power they make. but you also have to be aware of the 5.0s torque curve. I have owned both, having a fat torque curve (which is funny cause we call it a curve, optimally you want the torque curve as FLAT as possible) is alot more fun and you can win alot more races when compared to a comparable top end motor of similar power. as far as getting 500hp out if it which I think you mentioned I would suggest either spray or boost. there are 5.0s out there that can make 500hp N/A but these are not usually street friendly motors. from stock they respond well to bolt ons. the achillies heel in that motor is the head. its not uncommon to get 40-60hp from a head swap and tune once all the supporting parts are in place. you can save money by going carborated, however I suggest spending the money on modding the HO motors efi setup. if you go the efi route make suer you are pulling parts from a car with mass air. the computers on mass air cars (about 88-93) can take a ton of modding without needing a re-tune(though tuning of course will get you more power). the speed density motors(no mass air sensor) can be modded just the same, but you will just be spending more time and money trying to tune the thing. always be searching classifieds on here, corral.net, ebay, local swap meets, and other places. used parts, not to mention almost whole 5.0 motors, are always getting baught and sold for far FAR under retail. btw, do you have any target power levels or target speed goals? hope some of this helps.
__________________
2006 Mustang GT. JLT, UDP's, CMDP's, Bamachips 93tune, LCAs, panard bar, spray, assorted madness. 7.79 @ 90.5 in the 1/8 like a BOSS
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Atomized
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,370
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
spray and pray |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
That is a sad thing, I'm sorry form your loss, but that's not the nitrous's fault.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Well, it brings me to another question. Does that mean a turbo would have been more safe?
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 Mustang GT
1991 sliver GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I just have to say i dont feel comfortable talking to someone with the name peniswatcher. Im just saing.. "Cartman voice " dog shit aint right.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MM Fanatic
1990 LX hatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
What happened when the smack junkie with a lisp screwed up cooking a dose? He made a meth....
__________________
![]() Bolt-on Abraham Lincoln Log motor. With extra wiring. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 Mustang GT
1991 sliver GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
But back to business. I think your wasting your time putting a stock motor in the 240.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Wow you domestic guys are very receptive
. We import guys tend to be douches on the forums.. Sorry I may have misdirected you btw. I am not looking for 500hp from the 302 I fear that almighty block crack. At those numbers I would just source a 351w block. I can make more power from my ka with that money but I was just wanting something a little different and more reliable. I think I have decided not to rebuild it until it takes a . Boost is definitely an option later I just don't know enough about ford tuning products yet. Besides from what I have read these motors are funny about boost if your using the wrong intake, cams, and heads. Boost would be easier as far as tolerences go tho, like I would lower compression by using a thicker headgasket which would inturn allow me to use a more aggressive cam/rocker setup right? Its going to cost next to nothing to have it sitting in my engine bay. I can't weld but my buddy is a pro lol. For about 6-700 I can have it in and running(stock).
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Get heads and an intake from an explorer 96-2001, but perferably mid 97-01 cuz the the heads flow just a little better. Upgrade the valve springs and run it. Heads from 96 - mid 97 are gt40's and mid 97-01 are gt40p's. Budget friendly. Here's some reading for you http://forums.corral.net/forums/5-0-...ing-gt40p.html
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
haha looks like I got some reading to do. Yeah I have noticed alot about the explorer heads and intake. I had running a carb in mind for simplicity but I have realized that not only will boost be my money maker later on but the better engines it seems are efi oe anyway. Like I really want a mid 85? to mid 92? mustang 5.0 because its forged and the explorer 5.0 has smaller accessories and better i/h's. IDK I'm going to this junkyard in the am to try to find one. I still could get a running towncar 5.0 with 110k on it for 300 tho. I still have a month before the build starts anyway because I'm waiting on my 2nd car. My "buddy" I keep referring to owns a wrecker service and hes hooking me up with a 01 forester for a grand. But we are waiting on the title.
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ls1 it
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE] |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 2.4L turbo to 5.0 240sx...got a few questions??
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Getting a Turbo!! (Also have a few questions) | Tigerwhite1 | V6 Mustangs | 47 | December 6th, 2008 12:19 AM |
| 240sx | scxc15 | Racer's Corner | 9 | June 28th, 2008 05:21 PM |
| v6 turbo questions | popmyclutch | V6 Mustangs | 46 | June 17th, 2007 10:54 PM |
| Turbo questions | man_of_war2081 | General Tech | 7 | January 30th, 2007 04:08 PM |