![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing compression 9 to 1 VS. 11 to 1 in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. My question is , if you have 3 high proformace engines all with the same parts ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 13
|
compression 9 to 1 VS. 11 to 1 |
|
|
#2 |
|
Feb 08 ROTM
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 7,287
|
There is no formula that I know of. I've heard engine builders say 1 compression point is worth 20-25 horsepower but it really depends on the rest of the combination.
__________________
Racing in memory of Dave Bandt 11/19/69 - 3/23/08 "he's traded his wheels for wings" Professor of Natural Aspiration ![]() Thanks to: Artie at Trick Flow, Dave at Team Z Motorsports, Brian at Total Engine Airflow and Harold at Furo Racecraft |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: compression 9 to 1 VS. 11 to 1
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compression | mustangmanic | 99-04 | 12 | October 10th, 2007 11:01 PM |
| compression? | matfernan1 | 99-04 | 5 | August 31st, 2007 12:42 AM |
| Compression | Clockman | 94-95 | 3 | May 4th, 2007 04:16 PM |
| compression | greenstallion | Engine | 4 | March 8th, 2007 07:40 PM |
| compression | greenstallion | Poweradders | 2 | March 6th, 2007 12:24 PM |