| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 | |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Hmmmm..... sounds like fudging numbers to me.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
90 GT
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vegas
Posts: 206
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Is this setup (tw170s, tf stage 2 cam & tf intake) safe for say a 100 shot on the stock bottom end? What would be a safe amount? Thanks...
__________________
Rewarding our friends, punishing our enemies. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Yep. They like to hide the fact that their inline head shrouds the valve on the stock bore engines. Lots of people mislead by that garbage. Still a good head, but not as great as they make it sound on a 4" or 4.030" bore.
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Fo sho
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Regular
90 GT
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vegas
Posts: 206
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
So with my setup, would a TW185 be too big? I eventually wanna stroke it to a 347 and would rather buy once if possible.
Thanks...
__________________
Rewarding our friends, punishing our enemies. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
You'll need the right cam if you're still 302 cubes. Too much intake duration and it will be lazy. You need something with decent lift and shorter duration on the intake to keep cylinder pressure up when using larger heads like that on a smaller cube engine. The OEM's have been doing it for a while now, so you don't need to worry about having too much head for your 302 as long as the valve events are correct. I would talk to a cam grinder about a cam if you run those heads on your engine. Done right, it'll scream. Wrong cam and it can be unimpressive.
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
My combo is 306, tw 185's track intake, stage 2 cam and flat top pistons. Great heads for the 347 future stroker that I WAS going to do before I decided to go 351/408. Going to send mine out in the future.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Regular
90 GT
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vegas
Posts: 206
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
So I'm kind of confused here...
Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51400015 - Trick Flow® Twisted Wedge® Track Heat® 190 Cylinder Heads for Small Block Ford - Overview - SummitRacing.com with Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51402001 - Trick Flow® Track Max® Hydraulic Roller Camshafts for Ford 5.0L - Overview - SummitRacing.com Would be ok or no? I'm going to Summit Tuesday morning and don't wanna fuck up. I also have a 100 shot nitrous kit I want to use eventually. Are the 190's too big? Should I go with the 170s? The price difference between the 170's and the 190's is like $150 whereas he 185's are like $500 more than the 170's. Thanks...
__________________
Rewarding our friends, punishing our enemies. |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Regular
90 GT
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vegas
Posts: 206
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Keep in mind its a 306 with a stock/standard bottom end.
__________________
Rewarding our friends, punishing our enemies. |
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I don't think that cam is right for the larger heads (FAC190s, or the TW185s). IMO, you'd be best to run the big heads, and a custom cam. If you're set of the TFS cam, run the 170s, but the really limits your room to grow in the future.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
'89 LX 'Vert
10's or bust... Literally.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Denver, Co
Posts: 2,915
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
lawl, pretty much the same shit I got, except I have a victor intake, and im going to be spraying a 150 shot, 200 if I need too...................... on hyper pistons too
__________________
H/C/I 302 + nitrous for now... supercharger/turbo soon? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Mustang LX 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
That's what I have, not saying that it's what you should use... just to keep it straight. The car isn't tuned yet, and I barely had it going last year before the snow flew, but I was happy with the results. I am only using the cam because it isn't/wasn't my final combo, so I wanted to use something that I knew would work. Power left on table, sure, but I didn't want to go custom because I was going to be changing so much up on the car. I also wouldn't use a track heat intake if my nitrous plate wasn't already for the street/track intakes. But I'm to cheap to buy a new plate and intake for this motor.
__________________
Point made in less than a few hours with minimal response. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post4465184 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/5-0-mustangs/217182-tw-170-afr-165-stock-bottom-end-w-tfs-stage-2-cam.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Thread TW 170 or AFR 165 on Stock Bottom End w/ TFS Stage 2 Cam | Forums at Modded Mustangs | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | December 15th, 2011 08:50 PM | |
Threads Similar to: TW 170 or AFR 165 on Stock Bottom End w/ TFS Stage 2 Cam
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Max HP on a stock 3V bottom end? | 06PONY | 2005 - 2010 | 24 | May 9th, 2011 03:11 PM |
| maximum rpm for stock bottom end | predator421 | 5.0 Mustangs | 12 | June 7th, 2010 06:00 PM |
| How Much HP On Stock Bottom End | 5litercobra | 2.3 Mustangs | 5 | November 13th, 2007 02:55 PM |
| 12s with stock bottom end? | 95wip | 94-95 | 8 | April 16th, 2007 11:10 PM |
| How Much HP Can Stock GT Bottom End Take? | Clutchmaster | 99-04 | 14 | March 22nd, 2007 03:58 PM |