| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 60
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
331 stroker balancing question
im building a dss 331 stroker motor i bought this kit from a guy that i know he bought the kit with low comp pistons this is what the kit was balanced for buy dss i sent the pistons back and bought there flat top pistons every thing else with the kit stayed the same it was balcanced using a 28oz harmonic balcancer and a 28oz flywheel the guy thats building my motor said he dosent think it needs to be rebalanced he has built alot of 9s mustang motors he said he has changed alot of pistons in stock motors to low comp pistons for blowers and nos with out having them rebalanced and never had any problems do you think this needs rebalanced any info helps
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If it was balanced with one set of pistons, and you bought another set of pistons, it needs rebalanced. The cost should be minimal, so just get it done. If you're spinning it up high, it needs to be right.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
|
You already got it apart. Do it right will save you stress later on. Technically you dont have to rebalance but at high rpm your engine will run smoother.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
2001 GT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bivalve MD
Posts: 575
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
there is no need to have it balanced again... your running the same crank correct ? if so dont worry with it. any good machine shop would tell you the same.
I would be more concerned with how the new pistons fit the existing block.
__________________
03 Mach 1 full eaton swap, 18" chrome bullitts, H&R springs, 5.0 shifter, slp2, mac catted H, FRP 4.10's,443 RWHP/ 386 TQ |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I do not agree. The rods and piston have more to do with balancing the rotating asemblely than the crank does, because they're the farthest away from the center. A few grams off in the pistons will make a lot more difference than anywhere else. It can't cost $50 because they're just going to match all the pistons. Any GOOD machine shop will tell you that. You're soending this much money. Don't half ass it.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Enthusiast
2001 GT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bivalve MD
Posts: 575
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
will having it rebalanced hurt no is it a must no.. he is not building a top fuel dragster......
__________________
03 Mach 1 full eaton swap, 18" chrome bullitts, H&R springs, 5.0 shifter, slp2, mac catted H, FRP 4.10's,443 RWHP/ 386 TQ |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 60
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Yeah the crank is the same every thing is the same except for the pistons the best price I have got to have it rebalanced was 225 and if it needs heavy metal it will be more
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Awwwww. Someone doesn't like to be told they're not agreed with. Is it a must to balance one in the first place? No. Is it the best thing to do? Yes. Sorry. The machinists that I know don't cut corners. That's retarded. The best machine shop in our area charges $125 to balance a rotating assembly.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player Last edited by 69fastback; December 6th, 2011 at 08:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 60
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Yeah where im at there's 2 shops in the area that do balancing and I told both what was going on and the best price was 225 plus I thought this was high price
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I guess it depends on the area you're in, it's $175 for a balance around here. If there's only 2 shops in your area, that would explain the high price, no competition to drive the price down.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 60
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Yeah that my thoughts on it and when you talk to them there's very little conference in them doing the balancing
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
We only have one real machine shop around here that does this type of work also. So when I get my 347 stroker I will either get a rotating assembly balanced from the company I get the assembly from such as scat or eagle, or I may just get a complete kit from FordStrokers to simply the whole thing. I am leaning more towards the latter choice.
Either way I would look into getting it balanced. Not for sure but maybe you could check the weight of each piston just to see how far off they are from each other. You would need a scale that can measure in grams though. I have one I use for reloading ammunition but it would work for weighing pistons. If you found they were all even you might get away without balancing but if they are different, and they probably will be, I would look further away for a real machine shop. Your bound to find one at least within a 3 hour drive. I wouldn't hesitate to drive that far for such a crucial job. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm sure your checking more then ammunition with that scale. Lmao
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/5-0-mustangs/241571-331-stroker-balancing-question.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Thread Engine Help 331 Stroker Build | Forums at Modded Mustangs | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | January 21st, 2012 11:45 PM | |
Threads Similar to: 331 stroker balancing question
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5.0 Stroker Question | BigEag205 | 4V / SVT | 6 | January 13th, 2011 11:04 PM |
| 347 stroker question | 95Pony | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | November 7th, 2010 06:51 PM |
| stroker kit balancing | DigitalDC89 | 5.0 Mustangs | 7 | October 28th, 2010 11:26 AM |
| Stroker Kit Question... | Traidmarx | 5.0 Mustangs | 12 | January 25th, 2009 09:20 AM |
| To Stroker or Not to Stroker? That is the Question! | 87StangLX | General Tech | 13 | October 20th, 2007 10:46 AM |