| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Mustang Fanatic
1989 Mustang LX
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Apple Valley, CA
Posts: 409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Cast crank is fine. It should be good for about 500 horsepower.
If you just want a fast street car, then 450whp should be more than enough to "put a smile on that face"... Ditch the I take and cam, I personally went with an xe274hr cam, AFR185's, and a track heat intake
__________________
89 Mustang LX: 347 AFR Comp Cam TFS Track Heat 359rwhp 395rwtq
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I don't have any friends up here unlike where I have lived all of my life so I am pretty much screwed. Yup...it sucks. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
89 Mustang
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Middle Way WV
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
again it comes down to what you want. How much HP are you looking to make really? do you have to pass emissions? are you gone to S/C or turbo it? and what is your budget? and what do you really want out of the car is it a street car or a DD or a race car or weekend street car that you want to be fast or real fast. A 12 sec car is a far cry from a 10 sec car they are not even on the same page.
__________________
Just another turbo Mustang..No dyno numbers just good ets and MPH. And yes it is fast for a street car. few parts for sale https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...l=en_US&pli=1# |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If the cast is good to about 500 HP again the stock block should hold up right? (also is this crank HP or at the wheels?) This car wont be a track car...just a daily driver that I can be proud to have fun with other cars on the road and the strip) If the car being naturally aspirated can get me in this category/range, it will save me a lot on not buying the SC or aftermarket block/forged crank. Also, what kind of tranny will support this? If a factory can, I would prefer a 5speed for fun but if I will gain a significant amount of time and maintenance, I will go with an auto. I look forward to more help with this and everyone on here so far has been more than nice. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If this car is never going to see the track then 800 hp is pointless, youll never be able to use that Hp on the street.
not to mention you would have a really hard time planting that power to the ground trying to get even close to that HP N/A will cost you more then if you got that horse power from a power adder. A power adder as much as they cost will be cheaper then building it with out one as for the stock block, there is no magic number where they will break, some may break at 450 Hp some will break at 500hp and some will make it to 600+ and they may not break the first time around, they may break on the 3rd pass or they could break on the 30 pass, it all depends on the tune, how well it was put to geather, the balancing, the hard ware used ect...... You would be happy with 450-500 hp rang i bet
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
1 Wheel Peel
2000 Mustang 393w
2001 Mustang GT Vert
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,583
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
Basically go big or go home
__________________
![]() 2000 393w Swapped Vert 2001 GT Vert 2002 Six Banger |
|
|
|
#27 | ||
|
Regular
1992 Mustang LX Hatch
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 63
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Based on this:
then I agree with this:
Like I mentioned earlier - i have a 347 stroker, and although I don't yet know the exact HP I'm dealing with, I can tell you that it's plenty fast for a daily driver, and can get me in much more trouble than I should probably have available to me. 800hp on the street or anything close to it will either wind up causing you more trouble than its worth (that prob won't be on pump gas!), or you'll be frustrated because all you'll do is spin everywhere when you tap the gas. My buddy had a car like that and it was nasty and sounded incredible, and he'd lose it at 80mph if he modestly downshifted. I'd agree with other folks on here and tell you to go to the track and the speed shops and start talking to people and making friends. Once you do, ask them to take you for a ride in their hot rods so you can feel what 400HP or 600HP feels like. Chances are you'll be plenty pleased with the former, which will then help you figure out exactly what path to take to reach your goal. |
||
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I think a lot of people have no idea what an honest 500 hp feels like. I'm not talking about an eBay ad for a car that has heads and cam, and claims 500 hp. I mean a real 500 Hp. 800 hp is leaps and bounds above 500 hp. My engine makes 500, and it's mostly useless on street tires. A friend has a GT500 that made 786rwhp, and I got to drive it once. Talk about useless. It wasn't even fun to drive on the street. The first thing you need to do is set a budget, and then you need a REAlISTIC goal. Have you thought about what you're going to have to do to your car to prepare it for that power? If you have a T5 just be ready for that to go in the dumpster.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Mustang Fanatic
1989 Mustang LX
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Apple Valley, CA
Posts: 409
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I talk a lot to the guys at GTR in rancho cucamonga, and they tell me a stock block, from Yeats of experience, handles 450whp safely. After that, it really depends how well it's put together and how you drive it.
As for your tranny, promotion has pretty decent trannys that'll handle up to 520hp for like $1300.. Plus core and shipping. It's a bolt on trans too ![]() I personally sought out Astro Performance as I prefer a tranny that has 26 spline input shaft and will handle 580ft/tq all day out of a well built T5. Also, it requires no modifications or extra parts to make it work(TKO's, t56s... Etc)
__________________
89 Mustang LX: 347 AFR Comp Cam TFS Track Heat 359rwhp 395rwtq
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Newbie
1990 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern MS
Posts: 39
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Not trying to thread jack, but I'm looking at stroking to a 347 and hitting 500 rwhp. Is it possible to do n/a and carbed? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
1 Wheel Peel
2000 Mustang 393w
2001 Mustang GT Vert
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,583
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
Why not? Its possible
__________________
![]() 2000 393w Swapped Vert 2001 GT Vert 2002 Six Banger |
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Regular
89 Mustang
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Middle Way WV
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yes, but it is not gone to be a friendly street car and you should start your own thread
__________________
Just another turbo Mustang..No dyno numbers just good ets and MPH. And yes it is fast for a street car. few parts for sale https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...l=en_US&pli=1# |
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Newbie
1990 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern MS
Posts: 39
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
will do
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
theres nothing wrong with requesting some info in some one elses thread. just my opinion...im mean you dont want to completely take it over but i dont see an issue with it, i do it all the time ...lol
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
1 Wheel Peel
2000 Mustang 393w
2001 Mustang GT Vert
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,583
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
![]() ![]() I would actually like to see that 347 500hp in a seperate thread so I can follow it. A guy in our car club is rebuilding is so i would like to know the potential of it with a carb setup
__________________
![]() 2000 393w Swapped Vert 2001 GT Vert 2002 Six Banger |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I am trying to adjust my budget for a Boss or Dart block just so that I will have it if I do end up with a crazy end result. Don't know if I should add the forged crank into the budget but it would certainly help if I could somehow upgrade my cast for forged. My budget needs to expand a little bit.
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i just dont want people to think that they can never ask a question about there own projects in some one else thread, a lot of the time the question that get answered help the original poster out any ways, ya know
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Regular
1992 Mustang LX Hatch
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 63
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Hey - I said that I'd re-post when I got my dyno results, so here they are:
366HP @ 5600RPM 396 ft./lbs @ 4100 RPM This equates to somewhere around 430HP & 465 ft./lbs of torque at the flywheel (that's using a generic 15% loss equation for a manual trans - your opinions on that may vary). There was some question earlier in the thread about "useable power" on the street...I can tell you that even at this modest amount of power, I'm able to (quite easily) lose the rear end of the car at 50mph if I downshift. That's on radials on dry flat ground so that might not be the case if I put my MT's back on. Either way, downshifting at 50mph and getting sideways wasn't quite what I intended to happen, so like I said - take a ride in a car that you think is powerful and see what you think before you go shooting for 800hp. I'm a little more than happy with my results...so much so that I'm now a bit timid to get into it at highway speeds! |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Need help on 347 stroker build (maybe supercharger)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 347 Stroker Build | Predator | 5.0 Mustangs | 65 | June 27th, 2011 01:08 PM |
| My 418 stroker build! | travis_ranger2000 | 5.0 Mustangs | 38 | December 4th, 2010 11:39 PM |
| 302 Stroker build 86 gt | michigan maniac | 5.0 Mustangs | 60 | December 7th, 2008 02:33 PM |
| How to build a 331 stroker | Drick | 5.0 Mustangs | 10 | January 25th, 2008 08:57 PM |
| 347 Stroker Build Up!!! | Speedstang302 | 5.0 Mustangs | 0 | October 6th, 2007 11:28 PM |