| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1991 Mustang GT 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 172
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
explorer gt-40p engine?
alright guys i found a good deal on a explorer gt-40p engine. my question is its not an HO but i have read that its just the cam. well i have a E303 Laying around i could use for now. also the firing order but thats a quick easy fix. let me know what you think. i have read on multiple forums the explorer gt-40 heads and intakes are better than stock 5.0 so i figured why not get the whole motor. and put some 1.7 rockers 24# injectors and a 70mm MAF calibrated for injectors and since explorer already has 65mm tb ill basically have a cobra motor. correct? let me know what you guys think.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Yea difference between the HO and non HO is only the cam and firing order. I could be wrong but I believe that the explorer motors used the HO (351) firing order. Either way, you'd probably get better results out of the e303 than the stock explorer cam, but that's not saying much. e303's aren't very good cams. Yes other than the cam, that's essentially a cobra engine.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1991 Mustang GT 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 172
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
right thats what i thought. but i also heard that they have dished pistons causing the compression to drop. so if i were to get some stock flat tops that would fix that correct? and as far as how the engine sits. i could drop that right in?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
1991 Mustang GT 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 172
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
and yea im not big on letter cams. but i got one laying around. no sense in buying a new cam when i already have one. im just looking for something faster than what i have not by much but reliable. i understand my car wont be that fast considering i still have the stock auto and 2.73 gears. but i drive on the highway alot so i wont be changing gears anytime soon. i will also be installing a transgo shift kit. but my main thing is i want a little more power with good mpgs and reliabilty. thanks for any opinions.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1989 Black LX---Turbo
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: just outside Minot, ND
Posts: 1,153
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Don't forget to put the Trick Flow spring kit on the heads before you do anything. The Explorer throttle body will also need to be modified. You need to take the throttle arm off of a 5.0 TB, remove the Explorer arm and weld the 5.0 arm onto it. The TPS will also need to be modified.
__________________
89 LX Black, Boss 331, C4,T76BB, FAST EFI 82 Capri RS,89 5.0 HO,Comp XE266,TW 170,T5,etc. 73 Dart Sport 340, 410ci Bracket Brawler 72 Demon 340 4-speed 1 of 1667 01 Ram Quad Cab 03 Grizzley 660 |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1991 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 6,063
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
![]() DART 331ci stroker, AFR 185 heads, Trick Flow R intake, Accufab 70mm tb, 75mm pro m Maf, 30lb injectors, jba headers, 2 1/2" x pipe flowmaster super 10 mufflers, 255 fuel pump, 3:27 gears |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 701
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
1.7 rockers don't usually do much because most heads reach max flow around .5-.55 lift. The e cam is so close to .5, 1.7 rockers would be a waste. They'll also be harder on your springs. The majority of the time 1.7s produce the best results is when they're used on the exahst valves, but even then, you need better springs and don't gain that much.
I'd say skip the rockers, get 30# injectors, 70mm tb, and 70 or 75mm maf, better springs. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
1991 Mustang GT 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 172
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Alright guys thanks for all of the advice! Any other parts I should pick up while I'm there. Everything will be 50% off so I wanna take advantage.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
94 GT
13.95@100
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 435
![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
If you want to run an Explorer engine, change out the cam and the valve springs at least. Plus the obvious stuff like the timing cover, valve covers, exhaust manifolds, distributor. The Explorer has weak springs, a lame cam and a different firing order from the H.O. motor. Changing to a Mustang cam fixes the firing order.
I had a stock Explorer engine in my car at one point, the only change was my H.O. Mustang cam. Under high RPM or other heavy load (uphill) I had extreme valve float. Not cool especially when going fast and one of those valves decides to smack a piston. That's why I changed to stronger springs on my GT40P heads with my new engine. If I could have used the Explorer throttle body on my SN95 I would have, but the bolt pattern is different. A little bracket switching and welding doesn't scare me But instead I'm out about $200 for a throttle body that fits and is adequate for my V8. If you drive on the highway a lot, changing to higher gears doesn't make sense. I like my stock gears. Low RPM cruising saves fuel, and I can do better than 140mph in fourth!
__________________
94 Opal Frost GT ~230k T5 swap, other mods
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 13
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
1991 Mustang GT 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 172
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Awesome! Thanks for all of the advise guys. I will be changing springs and all hardware with a tfs spring kit. 5.0freak. Are you saying with this combo I discribed I should be making 300 or so HP at the crank?
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 13
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yes you should, if you do the following upgrades mentioned and on a mustang short block. do you know what heads you have?
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1991 Mustang GT 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 172
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Right now I have stock e7s. But I will be getting gt40p I am going to build this engine out of the car then drop it in. So I will have the required headers also. I need reliability so I'm not going to build an all out race engine. I have to drive about 60 miles a day. I will be starting g college soon so I need reliability. But want power. Also there is no way in hell I am giving up my baby for better gas Milage. Those are the best miles of my life. Thanks for all of the input guys I really appreciate it. Then when I pull the other motor maybe ill build that one right. For the 87 4 Banger I have in the back. Can anybody say SLEEPER?!
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: explorer gt-40p engine?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| explorer engine swap | livemustang13 | 99-04 | 23 | June 30th, 2011 02:15 PM |
| Explorer engine swap ~ possible? | benleonheart | 2005 - 2010 | 14 | April 18th, 2011 05:53 PM |
| explorer engine swap | mxnate116 | 5.0 Mustangs | 16 | January 22nd, 2010 01:37 AM |
| cam for explorer engine??? | cobtc | 5.0 Mustangs | 8 | May 8th, 2009 01:58 PM |
| Explorer Engine | mxnate116 | 5.0 Mustangs | 29 | November 18th, 2007 08:24 PM |