soooo 11 second car?
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 25th, 2012, 04:47 AM   #1
Regular
 
1991 Ford Mustang LX
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
70-yenko-nova is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

soooo 11 second car?


I had a high 10 second malibu back about a year go but it wasnt streetable for shit 4200 stall with a strange spool. However I was going to start looking for an older 4 eye (notch preferable) for pretty cheap and going to make a low12 high 11 second car with potential to grow to 10 second car without being a pain in the ass like the bu was. Something able to drive 70+ miles to the track if need be without even THINKING of "will this go wrong" . i know this will be a huge open debate but im just curious.
302/351
Supercharger/Turbo/Nitrous
etc
thank you all


Also for cheap as possible without sacrificing responsibility example Hellionss 5000$ turbo kit vs On3's 1500 and B&G Turbo 2000+ hellion is too much a name.. on3 seems almsot TOO cheap and B&G seems good.
__________________



Car for sale.. for the right price.

Last edited by 70-yenko-nova; January 25th, 2012 at 05:51 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old January 25th, 2012, 06:49 AM   #2
Regular
 
1993
12.53@110.85
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
Fiacco819 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

You can build a bolt-on 302 and hit high 11's, Then invest some time and money to move shiftpoints to 7-7.5k RPM and run high 10's. Doing it N/A makes it respectable.
__________________
Roc City Mustangs
12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60'
Rochester, NY
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 07:28 AM   #3
Regular
 
1991 Ford Mustang LX
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
70-yenko-nova is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

respectable yes but n/a builds aren't normally as streetable (in my own experience) because your motor can never really be turned down. plus i was hoping to never get my revs NEAR that high for simple fact of revs kill motors.
__________________



Car for sale.. for the right price.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 08:11 AM   #4
Premium Member
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Fiacco819 View Post
You can build a bolt-on 302 and hit high 11's, Then invest some time and money to move shiftpoints to 7-7.5k RPM and run high 10's. Doing it N/A makes it respectable.
I'm gong to say it would cost $6000+ to build an engine to that would turn that many RPMs. You're talking about a HIGH dollar valvetrain, with really good heads, and intake, and the stock block would not put up with it long. RPMs kill engines. There are a lot cheaper ways to build a car to go 10s.

A stock 302, with a Trick Flow top end kit will do 11s, and you should lose around a second on a 100 shot. Even cheaper than that, GT40 junk, with a decent cam is capable of high 11s, if you can drive.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \.
( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ )
\_ o _ _____ _ o _/
|___| ......... |___|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 08:40 AM   #5
Regular
 
1993
12.53@110.85
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
Fiacco819 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

That's why I said with tIme and money, it can go 10's. My 12 flat notch n/a is perfectly fine as a daily driver. Gets better miladge than my pickup even. Shifting at 6k is still below factory 6200 rpm limiter and could be built for roughly 1500 if used parts and self labored. Should even hit mid to high 11's. And yea hit it with spray and the only limit is block rating
__________________
Roc City Mustangs
12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60'
Rochester, NY
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 08:49 AM   #6
Premium Member
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

7500 RPMs is way more destructive than a 100 shot.


I don't really get into the whole "it ran this, BUT it should run faster" stuff. Mine should go 10s N/A, but it's just ran a measly 11.3, so that's what it runs. An 11.3. If you do 12 flat, why does it still say 12.53 in your profile? Just curious?
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \.
( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ )
\_ o _ _____ _ o _/
|___| ......... |___|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 09:34 AM   #7
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
StangBanger302 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Fastback nailed it. Trick flow top end kit should run 12.0s all day long with a bad driver. Add in a conservative 100-125 shot and 10.90s can be had for cheap! Or, you can get used Trick Flow heads (800$), custom cam (325$), trick flow r-intake (350$) with full exhaust (300$) and some 4:10s and run fatser than 11.50s if the rest of your car is up to it.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street
I pray for traction I can keep
But if I spin, and begin to slide
Please dear God, protect my ride
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 09:35 AM   #8
Regular
 
1993
12.53@110.85
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
Fiacco819 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I'm not talking a big game about my numbers, they don't matter in this post so don't get hung up on that. My point was simply for 1500, you can hit high 11's low 12's n/a. And that if you want to stay n/a, it costs money and time to hit 10's. I also wasn't bad mouthing spray, simple stated anything over 450hp is risking the block no matter what adder you have
__________________
Roc City Mustangs
12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60'
Rochester, NY
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 09:35 AM   #9
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
StangBanger302 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 69fastback View Post
7500 RPMs is way more destructive than a 100 shot.


I don't really get into the whole "it ran this, BUT it should run faster" stuff. Mine should go 10s N/A, but it's just ran a measly 11.3, so that's what it runs. An 11.3. If you do 12 flat, why does it still say 12.53 in your profile? Just curious?
I was wondering the same thing.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street
I pray for traction I can keep
But if I spin, and begin to slide
Please dear God, protect my ride
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 10:29 AM   #10
Regular
 
1993
12.53@110.85
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
Fiacco819 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Because 12.5 is my personal best, 12.09 was the cars best with an experienced driver. So once again, don't get hung up on my times. Look past that fact and stay on OP's topic / question. We're all entitled to our own suggestion, don't need to hate on mine for suggesting a cheap n/a build
__________________
Roc City Mustangs
12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60'
Rochester, NY
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 10:30 AM   #11
El Conquistador
 
whiteboycustom's Avatar
 
83 coupe
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: vidor,texas
Posts: 1,149
whiteboycustom is just really nicewhiteboycustom is just really nicewhiteboycustom is just really nicewhiteboycustom is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to whiteboycustom Send a message via Yahoo to whiteboycustom
Default

408,good suspension,weight reduction......still reliable to daily drive or long distances, but being a older car issues can pop up anywhere
__________________
http://www.donttearmedown.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 10:34 AM   #12
Premium Member
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light69fastback is a glorious beacon of light
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Fiacco819 View Post
Because 12.5 is my personal best, 12.09 was the cars best with an experienced driver. So once again, don't get hung up on my times. Look past that fact and stay on OP's topic / question. We're all entitled to our own suggestion, don't need to hate on mine for suggesting a cheap n/a build
Sorry, I took your response as a suggestion to build something that would spin to 7500 RPMs, which is far from a cheap build, and completely unnecessary for the goal.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \.
( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ )
\_ o _ _____ _ o _/
|___| ......... |___|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 11:09 AM   #13
Regular
 
1991 Ford Mustang LX
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
70-yenko-nova is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

4.10 seems like stupid high gearing too me.. just my opinion.. another problem.. seeing as tko's stupid fucking expensive i was going to use a bulletproof c4 (or a toploader if possible). Im more set on a nitrous set up personally and when you say TF top end.. what exactly do you mean.
__________________



Car for sale.. for the right price.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 11:13 AM   #14
El Conquistador
 
whiteboycustom's Avatar
 
83 coupe
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: vidor,texas
Posts: 1,149
whiteboycustom is just really nicewhiteboycustom is just really nicewhiteboycustom is just really nicewhiteboycustom is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to whiteboycustom Send a message via Yahoo to whiteboycustom
Default

Originally Posted by 70-yenko-nova View Post
4.10 seems like stupid high gearing too me.. just my opinion.. another problem.. seeing as tko's stupid fucking expensive i was going to use a bulletproof c4 (or a toploader if possible). Im more set on a nitrous set up personally and when you say TF top end.. what exactly do you mean.
TRICK FLOW
__________________
http://www.donttearmedown.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 11:52 AM   #15
Regular
 
1993
12.53@110.85
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
Fiacco819 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Trick flow top end kit, comes with aluminum heads, intake, cam. Pretty much everything youll need
__________________
Roc City Mustangs
12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60'
Rochester, NY
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 11:55 AM   #16
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
StangBanger302 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Trick Flow top end kit. Comes with Cylinder heads, camshaft, intake manifolds, timing chain, gaskets, rockers etc.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street
I pray for traction I can keep
But if I spin, and begin to slide
Please dear God, protect my ride
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 11:55 AM   #17
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
StangBanger302 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 70-yenko-nova View Post
4.10 seems like stupid high gearing too me.. just my opinion.. another problem.. seeing as tko's stupid fucking expensive i was going to use a bulletproof c4 (or a toploader if possible). Im more set on a nitrous set up personally and when you say TF top end.. what exactly do you mean.
If you're doing a C4 I would NOT suggest getting less than 4:10s
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street
I pray for traction I can keep
But if I spin, and begin to slide
Please dear God, protect my ride
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 12:35 PM   #18
Regular
 
1991 Ford Mustang LX
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
70-yenko-nova is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

whys not less then 4.10's? would it even cruise on the highway?
__________________



Car for sale.. for the right price.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 12:47 PM   #19
MM Fanatic
 
95StangMX's Avatar
 
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice95StangMX is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

4.10's are actually a pretty low gear, not high....They run good in an auto with overdrive NA but if you are going with a c4 and thinking to do some kind of power adder I would go with 3.73's I know there is going to be a big debate on this topic so just for the record I am saying "I" would go with....my opinion!!
__________________


People should think about boarding up their glass house before starting a rock fight!
  Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2012, 12:48 PM   #20
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
StangBanger302 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I wouldn't suggest an automatic from the get-go. I'm more of a manual guy myself And I wouldn't go less than 4:10s because you have 3 ratios to go through in the quarter mile instead of 4 like us 5 speed guys. IF I were to do an auto, it would definitely be a built AOD. You still have overdrive and it bolts right in to a fox.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street
I pray for traction I can keep
But if I spin, and begin to slide
Please dear God, protect my ride
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: soooo 11 second car?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Soooo, anyone have this? 2VSouth The Clubhouse 36 October 25th, 2011 04:43 PM
I want these soooo bad! 2004CobraBound 2011+ 21 March 6th, 2011 11:35 AM
Soooo anyone take EMT-101 AMmuslGT The Clubhouse 7 September 30th, 2009 06:57 PM
soooo 707Stang The Clubhouse 4 June 8th, 2009 07:05 PM
soooo any one want to buy me this? :D MaroonNotchback408 5.0 Mustangs 18 May 4th, 2009 04:40 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.