| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1991 Ford Mustang LX
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
soooo 11 second car?
I had a high 10 second malibu back about a year go but it wasnt streetable for shit 4200 stall with a strange spool. However I was going to start looking for an older 4 eye (notch preferable) for pretty cheap and going to make a low12 high 11 second car with potential to grow to 10 second car without being a pain in the ass like the bu was. Something able to drive 70+ miles to the track if need be without even THINKING of "will this go wrong" . i know this will be a huge open debate but im just curious.
302/351 Supercharger/Turbo/Nitrous etc thank you all Also for cheap as possible without sacrificing responsibility example Hellionss 5000$ turbo kit vs On3's 1500 and B&G Turbo 2000+ hellion is too much a name.. on3 seems almsot TOO cheap and B&G seems good.
__________________
![]() Car for sale.. for the right price. Last edited by 70-yenko-nova; January 25th, 2012 at 05:51 AM. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
1993
12.53@110.85
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You can build a bolt-on 302 and hit high 11's, Then invest some time and money to move shiftpoints to 7-7.5k RPM and run high 10's. Doing it N/A makes it respectable.
__________________
Roc City Mustangs 12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60' Rochester, NY |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1991 Ford Mustang LX
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
respectable yes but n/a builds aren't normally as streetable (in my own experience) because your motor can never really be turned down. plus i was hoping to never get my revs NEAR that high for simple fact of revs kill motors.
__________________
![]() Car for sale.. for the right price. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
A stock 302, with a Trick Flow top end kit will do 11s, and you should lose around a second on a 100 shot. Even cheaper than that, GT40 junk, with a decent cam is capable of high 11s, if you can drive.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
1993
12.53@110.85
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
That's why I said with tIme and money, it can go 10's. My 12 flat notch n/a is perfectly fine as a daily driver. Gets better miladge than my pickup even. Shifting at 6k is still below factory 6200 rpm limiter and could be built for roughly 1500 if used parts and self labored. Should even hit mid to high 11's. And yea hit it with spray and the only limit is block rating
__________________
Roc City Mustangs 12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60' Rochester, NY |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
7500 RPMs is way more destructive than a 100 shot.
I don't really get into the whole "it ran this, BUT it should run faster" stuff. Mine should go 10s N/A, but it's just ran a measly 11.3, so that's what it runs. An 11.3. If you do 12 flat, why does it still say 12.53 in your profile? Just curious?
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Fastback nailed it. Trick flow top end kit should run 12.0s all day long with a bad driver. Add in a conservative 100-125 shot and 10.90s can be had for cheap! Or, you can get used Trick Flow heads (800$), custom cam (325$), trick flow r-intake (350$) with full exhaust (300$) and some 4:10s and run fatser than 11.50s if the rest of your car is up to it.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street I pray for traction I can keep But if I spin, and begin to slide Please dear God, protect my ride |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
1993
12.53@110.85
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm not talking a big game about my numbers, they don't matter in this post so don't get hung up on that. My point was simply for 1500, you can hit high 11's low 12's n/a. And that if you want to stay n/a, it costs money and time to hit 10's. I also wasn't bad mouthing spray, simple stated anything over 450hp is risking the block no matter what adder you have
__________________
Roc City Mustangs 12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60' Rochester, NY |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street I pray for traction I can keep But if I spin, and begin to slide Please dear God, protect my ride |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
1993
12.53@110.85
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Because 12.5 is my personal best, 12.09 was the cars best with an experienced driver. So once again, don't get hung up on my times. Look past that fact and stay on OP's topic / question. We're all entitled to our own suggestion, don't need to hate on mine for suggesting a cheap n/a build
__________________
Roc City Mustangs 12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60' Rochester, NY |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
El Conquistador
|
408,good suspension,weight reduction......still reliable to daily drive or long distances, but being a older car issues can pop up anywhere
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1991 Ford Mustang LX
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
4.10 seems like stupid high gearing too me.. just my opinion.. another problem.. seeing as tko's stupid fucking expensive i was going to use a bulletproof c4 (or a toploader if possible). Im more set on a nitrous set up personally and when you say TF top end.. what exactly do you mean.
__________________
![]() Car for sale.. for the right price. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
El Conquistador
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
1993
12.53@110.85
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 203
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Trick flow top end kit, comes with aluminum heads, intake, cam. Pretty much everything youll need
__________________
Roc City Mustangs 12.53@110.85 N/A 1.87 60' Rochester, NY |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Trick Flow top end kit. Comes with Cylinder heads, camshaft, intake manifolds, timing chain, gaskets, rockers etc.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street I pray for traction I can keep But if I spin, and begin to slide Please dear God, protect my ride |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street I pray for traction I can keep But if I spin, and begin to slide Please dear God, protect my ride |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Regular
1991 Ford Mustang LX
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whiteman AFB
Posts: 89
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
whys not less then 4.10's? would it even cruise on the highway?
__________________
![]() Car for sale.. for the right price. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
MM Fanatic
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
4.10's are actually a pretty low gear, not high....They run good in an auto with overdrive NA but if you are going with a c4 and thinking to do some kind of power adder I would go with 3.73's I know there is going to be a big debate on this topic so just for the record I am saying "I" would go with....my opinion!!
__________________
![]() People should think about boarding up their glass house before starting a rock fight! |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1992 Mustang LX
13.0 @ 105
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 2,230
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I wouldn't suggest an automatic from the get-go. I'm more of a manual guy myself
And I wouldn't go less than 4:10s because you have 3 ratios to go through in the quarter mile instead of 4 like us 5 speed guys. IF I were to do an auto, it would definitely be a built AOD. You still have overdrive and it bolts right in to a fox.
__________________
As I lay rubber down the street I pray for traction I can keep But if I spin, and begin to slide Please dear God, protect my ride |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: soooo 11 second car?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Soooo, anyone have this? | 2VSouth | The Clubhouse | 36 | October 25th, 2011 04:43 PM |
| I want these soooo bad! | 2004CobraBound | 2011+ | 21 | March 6th, 2011 11:35 AM |
| Soooo anyone take EMT-101 | AMmuslGT | The Clubhouse | 7 | September 30th, 2009 06:57 PM |
| soooo | 707Stang | The Clubhouse | 4 | June 8th, 2009 07:05 PM |
| soooo any one want to buy me this? :D | MaroonNotchback408 | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | May 4th, 2009 04:40 PM |