| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Holy Dick Castle!
1988 GT VERT (Sold :(
'Cause she's got a... GRRRREAT ASS!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: KC MO
Posts: 11,974
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ford C-6 rpms
My transmission is about to go out and I was wondering If I should go with the c6 or with the aod. Is the c6 ok for a daily driver and does anyone know what the rpms would be with 3.73 gears?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
sure a c6 is OK if you don't mind the 25-30% drivetrain loss from the transmission alone. Not to mention they weigh a TON.
Did you mean a C-4? Much better transmission for a mustang. Without overdrive you are going to be pretty high up in the RPMs. It will be the same as only having 4 gears in a T-5. Off the cuff, I would guess about 3000 rpms at 70 mph with 25-26" tires. If you do a lot of highway driving you'll want an AOD. PA has some decently build AODs. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Holy Dick Castle!
1988 GT VERT (Sold :(
'Cause she's got a... GRRRREAT ASS!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: KC MO
Posts: 11,974
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I heard it is a huge p.i.t.a. to convert to a manual and I thought a rwd already loses 30% loss so an aod takes 30% more?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
No I was talking about a c6. It has a huge rotational mass and is also a big heavy tranmission. I wouldn't put a C6 in a mustang, period.
20% power loss is what I normally figure for driveline loss from a good automatic from the flywheel to the wheels 15% loss for a manual car 30% loss for something like a C6 An AOD is fine, a C4 is better for racing because it is light, has a low rotational mass, and can be built relatively strong. A C4 is no good on the highway though with 3.73s and street tires. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
A C6 is good for scrap and that's about it. A C4 is a much better choice.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
|
I have a c-6 and even though it shifts rock solid I wish I had gone with a c-4 instead. The powerloss from going to a c-6 from an AOD was noticeable.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New jersey
Posts: 1,559
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
swapping over to a manual trans is a very easy conversion and is a lot more fun on the street.
__________________
Heres a real funny video youtube.com/watch?v=ojB7KkaR03I VTEC stands for Very Torqueless Economy Car Honda stands for Hold On Not Done Accelerating 1991 LX 5.0 H/B(T-70 turbo coming soon) |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
My Stallion is Bigger!
|
How about an E4od? I know they are fairly good tranny's I have had no problems out of the one I had in my bronco.
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Ford C-6 rpms
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vibration at low RPMS..... hmm | Ole Yeller | V6 Mustangs | 8 | June 15th, 2007 05:53 PM |
| 7500 rpms? | matfernan1 | 99-04 | 10 | June 14th, 2007 01:36 PM |
| HELP, Car shakes bad over 2,800 rpms | YNOT | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | April 16th, 2007 06:38 PM |
| shifting rpms | o3gtdgs | 99-04 | 23 | December 28th, 2006 11:55 AM |
| dropping rpms | rocket | 5.0 Mustangs | 6 | August 21st, 2006 09:46 PM |