| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Bunch of EFI Questions!!!
hey guys..im brand new to EFI mustangs, and basically EFI all together..now i just bought a new mustang 3 weeks ago and had an b303 cam laying around, but an opertunity came around i jumped on..brand new f303 cam for $50..now i know most of the rules of EFI, like with that big of a cam i need bigger injectors or it will starve for fuel..then i was reading that i may need a new MAF sensor calibrated for 24lb injectors, and then also the PCM needs to be calibrated for 24lb injectors..how do i do this?? and do i rlly need a MAF sensor for 24lb injectors?? and i also bought a 75mm throttle body and EGR spacer, does the MAF sensor have to be roughly 75mm?? im rlly confused..i need it running and passing MASS inspection in just 3 weeks..and only a little time to work on it..and this is holding getting it all back together..all responses are greatly appreciated..thanks
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
First of all you do not need 24 lb injectors for an b or F cam
If you do put in 24lbers then you will need a new MAF or recalibration The pcm does not need a new calibration, but a tuner is nice With a larger TB you might want a larger MAF though
__________________
1986 Mustang GT t-top time piece! |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Enthusiast
|
rule of thumb with MAF and TB is that your MAF always has to be bigger then the TB otherwise its like running a funnel backwards.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
1.6 rr ported upper and lower heavily ported 302 E7 heads double valve spring bigger valves full exhuast cold air full ignition under drive pullys.. it wont starve for fuel w/ all that stuff with stock #19 injectors?? and im thinking 76mm C&L Mass Air 75mm Holley Throttle Body & EGR Spacer 24lb injectors.. do i need that stuff w/ my setup..i do plan on doing much more..or am i still fine w/ 19lb injectors?? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
Oh well now that you mention all that other stuff.
You might be ok with 19s but 24s would be good idea. I like the tweecer for a tuner.
__________________
1986 Mustang GT t-top time piece! |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On my way to Baines's house!!
Posts: 3,298
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
Rotating The Earth 1320 Feet At A Time!! Today, I found out that when I masturbate at night while watching internet porn I cast a huge shadow on the curtain and the entire street is able to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On my way to Baines's house!!
Posts: 3,298
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
Rotating The Earth 1320 Feet At A Time!! Today, I found out that when I masturbate at night while watching internet porn I cast a huge shadow on the curtain and the entire street is able to see it.
|
||
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
|
19# are good to 300 flywheel horsepower. 24# would be nice and leave you room to grow, but I doubt they are necessary just yet.
If you get the 24# injectors, you need to get a MAF calibrated to 24#. Nothing more, nothing less. All the MAF does is send a voltage signal to the computer, so as long as the MAF compensates for the injectors nothing else needs to. Stick to Pro-M or PMAS (same people) for your MAF - C&L is not reliable. I know I've talked to someone here who is running C&L and he will be the first to admit that although it works well for him, he is very much in the minority of overall C&L results. If you're in a rush to get it does and pass inspection, I would stick with the stock injectors for the time. As far as the cams, people around here tend to cane you for using the "alphabet" cams, but I'm under the assumption that horsepower is horsepower and I've been in some alphabet cammed cars that damn near threw me in the trunk from a standstill. I believe the B and F cams peak high. One guy I know went from an E to an F and regretted it - I like my E because it has more midrange than the other and as far as I can tell, still gets the job done. Just to throw out some more EFI wisdoms. . . Yeah, a MAF housing that is at least as big as your TB is a good idea. The stock MAF is 55mm and the stock TB is 58mm so it's like the inverted funnel someone already mentioned. Of course, if you upgrade TB, it makes sense to upgrade the EGR spacer. And it makes sense to upgrade or at least port the upper intake to match your EGR spacer. You can see where this is going, eh? Just don't put a bigger TB on and expect more horsepower. People fear EFI and think it's some mystical bullshit that steals your horsepowers while you're not looking or something. I've seen one guy spend at least $2,000 on a Fox body 5.0, which was his first EFI, not get the performance he wanted and sell the car. It's the same principles as carb, we just have more parts and more wires. |
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
i also am soon getting trick flow or edelbrock aluminum heads for it..alot of basic bolt on and some internal stuff..but hope to be around 325-350hp..plenty fine for me..i dont need to blow the doors off this thing..it only has 56k on it and i'd like to let it live its entire life..just be fast enough on the street..thats it..i'll get another if i wanna push 5-600hp..and beat the shit out of it on the track and street.. now when you say wideband o2, you're talking bout o2 sensors?..now what are wideband sensors?? |
|||
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
..so i settled for the f cam..now i have ported upper and lower...heavily ported and built up 302 heads..and alot of other bolt ons..so im seeing 300hp coming pretty soon..so 24lb maybe for the best..and as far as i've learned a 75 or 70mm throttle body and same size EGR spacer and then along with 76mm MAF sensor..so please tell me best bang for least amount of the buck on Throttle body EGR Spacer MAF Sensor Injectors and what size's would be best..and not kill me more on gas..and yes i know what i signed up for when i started modding a mustang..
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Enthusiast
|
A wideband sensor is just a sensor that monitors your air/fuel ratio. It's normally always used (by smart people) in forced induction setups. It doesn't have anything to do with the O2 sensors.
As long as you're naturally aspirated I would not spend my money on one. I think Stangzilla was talking about that in the context of a stand alone engine management system which would allow you to tweak all kinda of things in the engine. Things that would break your engine if you ran it too hard, too long, too lean or whatever. If you're just looking for 325 horse at the crank, you won't need to get into that level of complication. Good old heads, cam and intake will do the job just fine. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Enthusiast
|
For starters, what size is the inside diameter on your upper intake?
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On my way to Baines's house!!
Posts: 3,298
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
Rotating The Earth 1320 Feet At A Time!! Today, I found out that when I masturbate at night while watching internet porn I cast a huge shadow on the curtain and the entire street is able to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 38
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Change your fuel pump from the stock to the 255.... you'll starve for fuel if you don't... Even if you have an adjustable fuel regulater on the rails, if you have the stock pump... you wont be able to pull the required fuel needed with your combo...
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Enthusiast
|
Find out what the inside diameter is before you start buying TB and all that.
You shouldn't need an adjustable fuel pressure regulator with your application. One member told me in another thread that he blew out his fuel pressure regulator when he switched to a 255lph pump, so maybe a new aftermarket one is a good idea when you get that pump. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
go to autozone or harbor freight and buy a $20 digital caliper and measure the inside of the intake. You will find you can use this tool for alot more applications so its worth the $20 if ya can get one.
__________________
1986 Mustang GT t-top time piece! |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Bunch of EFI Questions!!!
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dumbest bunch of people ever! | 232stang | The Clubhouse | 2 | June 22nd, 2007 10:12 PM |
| Bunch of questions | Juggalo_X | V6 Mustangs | 42 | April 28th, 2007 10:37 AM |
| A bunch of questions about replacing heads and much more | TwinFox | V6 Mustangs | 0 | July 20th, 2006 02:45 AM |