![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Under/Over rated heads in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. I have been doing some research on a 427 build I would like to do ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
|
Under/Over rated heads
I have been doing some research on a 427 build I would like to do from a 351 block. And I have decided to go with 225 series heads. I have compared the AFR's, Trick Flow, and Dart. I have always been told AFR's are the way to go, but after researching, AFR's come in dead last in flow charts, combustion chamber sizes, and exhaust port sizes. Second is Dart and first place is Trick Flow. Does anyone have any thoughts on this topic. Hopefully i get some good feedback on this. Has anyone actually seen an AFR or Dart head out perform a Trick Flow in its matching series. I.E 225 to 225 or 205 to 205 etc. And lastly is there an even better head than Trick Flow?
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
|
Flow numbers are a very small part of the equation. Numbers taken at 28 inch depression is not even close to a running engine. What are there no numbers at 50+ Inch like on a running engine? Noone knows since the testing equipment is nill. What are you trying to do first off? Make 800+ The TFS and AFR will outperform the Darts, thats been proven time and again on running combinations, not that the dart is bad, by no means, but lets be realistic, are you building a class car? I mean if there is no limits then run a CFE Pro King head, how about a CHI, how about a Victor Glidden etc etc. Any of those 3 heads will be more than 99% of what people can handle. If it were me, it would be a TEA TFS, then the AFR
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
|
Its an 800 hp application and what is TEA?
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
|
Im so far away from even being able to put everything down on paper. I cant make hard decisions on many things. I just think its better to research it all before I just go have some one build me a blown 427 motor.
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
|
Just ask yourself if you have 12k+ dollars, thats the hardest decision, if you got that, its easy
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 3,654
|
What exactly do you mean? There are a lot of gaps between flow numbers and hp numbers, but I'm not sure I understand this one...??? |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
|
I second that question.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Under/Over rated heads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tire review// Hankook R106 V rated | JASonic | Parts | 1 | September 24th, 2007 09:42 PM |
| GT40 heads vs GTP heads | 99TurboV6Stang | 5.0 Mustangs | 9 | September 18th, 2007 10:34 PM |
| X-RATED RIDDLES | WAR-PARTY | The Clubhouse | 6 | July 18th, 2007 02:01 AM |
| RHS heads , are they good cylinder heads? | hitorx | 5.0 Mustangs | 25 | May 12th, 2007 10:55 PM |
| Boss 302 Heads Same As Cleveland Heads? | ken5_0 | Classic Mustangs | 8 | September 25th, 2006 04:18 PM |