Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

Discussing Under/Over rated heads in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. I have been doing some research on a 427 build I would like to do ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old September 12th, 2007, 12:24 AM   #1
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
Default

Under/Over rated heads


I have been doing some research on a 427 build I would like to do from a 351 block. And I have decided to go with 225 series heads. I have compared the AFR's, Trick Flow, and Dart. I have always been told AFR's are the way to go, but after researching, AFR's come in dead last in flow charts, combustion chamber sizes, and exhaust port sizes. Second is Dart and first place is Trick Flow. Does anyone have any thoughts on this topic. Hopefully i get some good feedback on this. Has anyone actually seen an AFR or Dart head out perform a Trick Flow in its matching series. I.E 225 to 225 or 205 to 205 etc. And lastly is there an even better head than Trick Flow?
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old September 12th, 2007, 12:35 AM   #2
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
Default

Flow numbers are a very small part of the equation. Numbers taken at 28 inch depression is not even close to a running engine. What are there no numbers at 50+ Inch like on a running engine? Noone knows since the testing equipment is nill. What are you trying to do first off? Make 800+ The TFS and AFR will outperform the Darts, thats been proven time and again on running combinations, not that the dart is bad, by no means, but lets be realistic, are you building a class car? I mean if there is no limits then run a CFE Pro King head, how about a CHI, how about a Victor Glidden etc etc. Any of those 3 heads will be more than 99% of what people can handle. If it were me, it would be a TEA TFS, then the AFR
 
Old September 12th, 2007, 12:52 AM   #3
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
Default

Its an 800 hp application and what is TEA?
 
Old September 12th, 2007, 12:55 AM   #4
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
Default

Originally Posted by powersrj
Its an 800 hp application and what is TEA?
Im intrigued, your shooting for 2hp per inch, tell me more about your goals etc.. Total Engine Airflow
 
Old September 12th, 2007, 12:58 AM   #5
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
Default

Im so far away from even being able to put everything down on paper. I cant make hard decisions on many things. I just think its better to research it all before I just go have some one build me a blown 427 motor.
 
Old September 12th, 2007, 01:04 AM   #6
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
Default

Just ask yourself if you have 12k+ dollars, thats the hardest decision, if you got that, its easy
 
Old September 12th, 2007, 04:05 PM   #7
MM Fanatic
 
ryans88gt's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 3,654
Default

Originally Posted by woody1
Numbers taken at 28 inch depression is not even close to a running engine. What are there no numbers at 50+ Inch like on a running engine?
I was just curious what you mean by this. 30 in Hg is complete vacuum. A difference of +50 in Hg from intake port to chamber would only occur if you were running 10 lbs of boost (-20 in Hg) and the engine was capable of creating complete vacuum (+30 in Hg) for a total of 50 in Hg. But that condition would only exist for a mere instant when the intake valve was opening.

What exactly do you mean? There are a lot of gaps between flow numbers and hp numbers, but I'm not sure I understand this one...???
 
Old September 12th, 2007, 04:49 PM   #8
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 137
Default

I second that question.
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Under/Over rated heads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tire review// Hankook R106 V rated JASonic Parts 1 September 24th, 2007 09:42 PM
GT40 heads vs GTP heads 99TurboV6Stang 5.0 Mustangs 9 September 18th, 2007 10:34 PM
X-RATED RIDDLES WAR-PARTY The Clubhouse 6 July 18th, 2007 02:01 AM
RHS heads , are they good cylinder heads? hitorx 5.0 Mustangs 25 May 12th, 2007 10:55 PM
Boss 302 Heads Same As Cleveland Heads? ken5_0 Classic Mustangs 8 September 25th, 2006 04:18 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.