| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1983 GT
UNKNOWN
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEMPHIS,TN
Posts: 126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
another estimate
stock bottom end, ported cast irons, victor jr intake, e303, 600 edelbrock, long tubes, 100 shot, manual tranny, solid mounts, gutted insides. hp and estimated et please im thinkin high 13's w/out spray and high 12's with. hp and tq i have no clue
__________________
1983 FOX BODY-LIL SOMTHIN IN PROGRESS |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You can run high 12s with an all stock motor, 3.55 gears and 100 shot.
With heads, cam and intake, high 11s should be within reach. if you want to know HP, take it to a dyno and get it tuned while you are there.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out. 03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it 04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it 89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
|
i should def get a dyno done when im finished after the winter. if you can run high 11's with heads cam and intake i should be pretty good..when i put the tfs tw heads, crane xtreme cam, rpm air gap, and im also installing forged pistons and reboring the block. along with a rebuild obviously. so with all that and my gears and other mods like headers and exhaust i should do pretty good in the 1/4.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
1983 GT
UNKNOWN
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEMPHIS,TN
Posts: 126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
its gonna be carbed no need to get it tuned. these are ported STOCK cast oron heads. they arent gt-40's either. all i have is cam and intake basically. plus 100 shot, gutted inside, drag radials, and full exhaust
__________________
1983 FOX BODY-LIL SOMTHIN IN PROGRESS |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
|
ryan is most likely right with the estimate he gave you. im not really sure what ported stock E7 heads give you hp wise compared to jsut stock no ported heads.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
1983 GT
UNKNOWN
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEMPHIS,TN
Posts: 126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
so if high 11's, then the full weight reduction it might take another second off?or maybe low 11's?
__________________
1983 FOX BODY-LIL SOMTHIN IN PROGRESS |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
1983 GT
UNKNOWN
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEMPHIS,TN
Posts: 126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
maybe even high 10's with a good driver?
__________________
1983 FOX BODY-LIL SOMTHIN IN PROGRESS |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1987 ford mustang gt
well see when shes done
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mascot, tn
Posts: 5,020
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
not likely at all
__________________
2004 tahoe z71 Daily 2004 BBM Gto ls1 6 speed 57,000 miles 1987 mustang hatch,347,world heads,systemax, kooks lts,nitrous, 6 point cage, team z front and rear suspension,8.8, 4.10s, 31 splines strange axles,wilwood brakes, tko600 |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 825
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
you guys must be on crack
10's come on now.......NO WAY
__________________
1989 mustang GT 5.0
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
|
yeaa no way your even going to be close to the 11's man. i think the rule of thunb is for every 100 pounds its a tenth of a second. so although weight does matter its not going to really amke that big of a difference. id say the most realistic estimate is low 13's with a 100 shot.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
|
adn how said anything about 10's white 89.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
1983 GT
UNKNOWN
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEMPHIS,TN
Posts: 126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
well thats what i said in the first place was 13's maybe 12's. its basically stock.
__________________
1983 FOX BODY-LIL SOMTHIN IN PROGRESS |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 825
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
says it right here
__________________
1989 mustang GT 5.0
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
|
oo i didnt even see that..im sorry..lol..but yeahh then in that case he is on crack.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 825
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yep he is on the pipe.......
__________________
1989 mustang GT 5.0
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
|
anyway jsut to clear it all up..your looking at 13's like ryan said.. but if you are really concerned about your 1/4 mile time..dont rush the build you have all winter to save up and get the ight parts and choose waht you want. thne you can realiztically look at better time on a N/A motor.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
1983 GT
UNKNOWN
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MEMPHIS,TN
Posts: 126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
well i said 13's at first cause thats what i personally feel like it will run. this is just to get it out of the backyard. ive got an extra block and a stroker kit to put in it as soon as i find the time. i know ill get get times out of it. i street race alot more than at the track so im worried about havin somethin besides my DD to race out there. here yall check out our forums theres some good vids out there heres a link
www.racevideoforums.com come join
__________________
1983 FOX BODY-LIL SOMTHIN IN PROGRESS |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,828
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
ok...first off notsoslow why reboring, if its been bored once than reboring will just shatter the cylinder walls..
10's..no way 11's MAYBE most likely mid 12's with 100shot and you can port the stock E7 heads to flow pretty well, cuz before i got my gt40's my stock ones were heavily bored, manley stainless valves, comp springs, harland sharp 1.6 rr's and those i'd say are much better than my gt40's with comp springs and HS 1.6's.. i ran 12.86 with GT40 head, GT40 upper lower, 65mm TB, 24 Inj, 76mm MAF, F303, HR 1.6's, 3:73 and drag radials..so with another 100shot i would have made 11's..so maybe the my guess of mid 12's to low 13's is the best range
__________________
![]() 1990 GT- GT40p Heads| Anderson N41 cam| Crane 1.6 RR's| Trickflow Intake|MGW Short Throw| Aluminum d/s| 3.73's.....still slow.... |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: another estimate
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Estimate | smoke-em | The Clubhouse | 14 | October 31st, 2007 03:33 PM |
| 1/4 and HP estimate | Mustang RacR94 | V6 Mustangs | 5 | October 31st, 2007 01:29 AM |
| hp estimate | patwrecked | 5.0 Mustangs | 20 | October 9th, 2007 08:14 PM |
| estimate | Mustang RacR94 | V6 Mustangs | 15 | April 27th, 2007 02:48 AM |
| HP estimate on my 5.0 | elusivexazian | 94-95 | 15 | February 21st, 2007 11:29 PM |