|
|
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Blogs | Garage | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Insurance |
| | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
August 8th, 2006, 12:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
 iTrader: 0 reviews
|
302,306,347,351-which motor would be best on boost (turbo)
which displacement would suite best for boost on the street... and would it be able to run 10's... 302.306.347,351
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
August 8th, 2006, 01:03 PM
|
#2 |
|
RLY SRS
 
|
You could use a 351 stroked out to like a 357 or so...It really depends on what else you plan on doing to the car and the engine...
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2006, 01:29 PM
|
#3 |
|
MM Fanatic
1999 Ford Mustang V6
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: newport news, va
Posts: 3,745
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i don't think displacement would matter all that much in comparison to compression ratio... all of those combinations can be made streetable and run into the 10's if setup right.
__________________
...even fire and single cammin 1986 Ford F-150 5.0L 2WD 1994 Toyota Pickup 2.4L 4WD 1999 Ford Mustang 3.8L V6 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0L 2WD 2008 GMC Sierra Denali 6.2L AWD |
|
|
|
August 8th, 2006, 02:35 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2006
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 855
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
"The gods too are fond of a joke." "If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith. " |
|
|
|
|
August 8th, 2006, 06:36 PM
|
#5 |
|
MM Ninjas!
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
 iTrader: 1 reviews
 |
Bigger is better. Build the motor as big as you can afford. But like has been mentioned, to run 10s with boost can be accomplished with any one of the mentioned engines. Alot of guys in my area are running 10s with stock 5 liter short blocks with blowers.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....  ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost 
|
|
|
|
August 16th, 2006, 10:36 PM
|
#6 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On my way to Baines's house!!
Posts: 3,298
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
right on about the compression but i went with the 347 because it has good torque all by itself
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 302,306,347,351-which motor would be best on boost (turbo)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| COMPRESSION FOR TURBO MOTOR? | sn-95aac | 5.0 Mustangs | 14 | May 28th, 2007 06:23 PM |
| Boost controller and turbo timer | trueballerisme | V6 Mustangs | 1 | February 28th, 2007 12:55 PM |
| Turbo Boost vs Super Boost | droppedbass87 | General Tech | 12 | October 16th, 2006 10:56 AM |
| Custom Turbo Timer, And Boost Controller Pod | Cricket | General Tech | 16 | July 26th, 2006 12:44 AM |
| does this setup sound good for about 18lbs of turbo boost? | frankenstein | 5.0 Mustangs | 2 | July 17th, 2006 12:29 AM |
