| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Turbo or Supercharger?
i want a 400- 450 hp out of my car using my 89 302.. what would be a better way to go twin turbo or supercharger?? which would be more reliable?
.which would be better for my engine life?and which would be a cheeper way to go (i can build my own turbo kit) to achieve my goal? for which you think would be best what other add ons would i need to get for the stock engine.AE CAM,HEADS,BLOCK WORK,INJECTORS,THROTTLE BODY,FUEL PUMP,? the car already has mac shorty headers,off road H pipe,underdrive pullys and a polished throttle body. I plan on taking everything apart and rebuilding it with fresh bearings seals rings gaskets rehone/bore if needed. port and polish intake and heads EXC is there anything i should replace while its apart. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1987 ford mustang gt
well see when shes done
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mascot, tn
Posts: 5,006
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yea forget the power adder crap an do a 347 stroker,build the hell out of it and put a 75shot of nitrous on it and you would be set
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
75 shot of nitrous=power adder.....just bustin chops jordan..
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
what would it take to get a 347 stroker to 400-450 hp and still be reliable?? non nitrous
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 685
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
you could easily get that out of a stock 5.0 with a supercharger or turbo. I would go supercharger just because i have more experience with them but thats your call
__________________
87 GT, typhoon upper and lower,70mm tb, 90mm maf, bbk shorties, bbk x-pipe, flowmaster cat back, 3:73 gear, pro 5.0 shifter, novi blower,afm power pipe, load IO, Trick Flow heads, Anderson B-31 cam, Anderson PMS, 42 lb injectors, t-rex fuel pump.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 685
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If i remember right stangzilla has a 347 putting down over 400 horse without a power adder, id shoot him a pm and inquire about his set up
__________________
87 GT, typhoon upper and lower,70mm tb, 90mm maf, bbk shorties, bbk x-pipe, flowmaster cat back, 3:73 gear, pro 5.0 shifter, novi blower,afm power pipe, load IO, Trick Flow heads, Anderson B-31 cam, Anderson PMS, 42 lb injectors, t-rex fuel pump.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Anatidaephobic
|
s/c in my opinion. if i don't stroke mine im thinking about putting a paxton 1200 s/c on it.
__________________
![]() Pittsburgh Steelers/Penguins/Pirates FTMFW!!!!! |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
a lot of people like turbo a lot better but there are a lot of supercharger applications out there for the 5.0 and that just seems like it would be easier
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i am thinking i will go s/c just cause i am sticking to a 5 speed but should i get the crank ballencer and flywheel balenced to make it run smoother and get more rpm's out of it?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
|
Vortech makes a nice kit for the 5.0 A built 347 with the vortech wouldnt be too bad imo
__________________
2003 SVT Cobra - Full Bolt Ons, Bassani, SCT Tune, Nitto's, 463rwhp! www.AmericanMuscleRegistry.com |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
but wont u get high compression with a stroker motor and isnt high compresson bad with FI?
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
no
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 559
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
450 at the crank?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Just outside of Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It all depends if you want a dyno queen or not. Is it going to be a daily driver? Do you want usable HP?
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
single turbo
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1988 lx
9.68@142
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: goldsboro NC
Posts: 5,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
it wont be a daily driver more like a weekend worrior and mabe a track night once a month or so..hmmm i cant decide on what to do lol.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1987 ford mustang gt
well see when shes done
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mascot, tn
Posts: 5,006
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
smart ass
![]() you know what i meant |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Regular
1979 mustang 5.0
hopefully 11's when complete
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 201
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
![]() I would defiantly go supercharged if this isn't a daily driver, Turbo's can save gas as compared to a s/c because they kick on only when brought to certain RMP's. But, superchargers are instant power, no hesitation! And it would just be WAY easier to get/install/work on I think |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Superchargers are not exactly instant, just like a turbo, they will provide a certain boost at a certain load and RPM. A SC boost curve is a little more predictable because it is driven directly from a belt but the "lag" is still there.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Enthusiast
1987 Mustang LX
13.9@102.43
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ephrata PA
Posts: 648
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
actually s/c have a parasitic attribute... there is no lag, just draws more power from the engine
__________________
HONDA: Hold on, Not done Accelerating A girl's legs are her best friends, but the best of friends must part. LIVE Tag- foxbody87
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Turbo or Supercharger?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbo or Supercharger? | Thor | V6 Mustangs | 46 | September 24th, 2010 12:07 PM |
| turbo, twin turbo, or supercharger? | mustangman87 | 5.0 Mustangs | 31 | March 6th, 2010 08:35 PM |
| which one turbo or supercharger | darkcyd | General Tech | 29 | June 29th, 2007 02:48 PM |
| Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo | justinsstang | General Tech | 24 | March 7th, 2007 10:07 PM |